View Single Post
Old 10-05-20 | 01:19 AM
  #25  
Ironfish653's Avatar
Ironfish653
Dirty Heathen
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 1,046
From: MC-778, 6250 fsw

Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033

Originally Posted by HD3andMe
Have you ever ridden a late model MTB?

Things change. Evolve even. Get more capable. Get more fun.
Originally Posted by Moisture
Nothing too fancy. Hence which isn probably why I think the Zaskar is a fantastic bike.

The Zaskar was a good bike. In 1996. When 26x1.95 was the typical tire size and 80mm was a long-travel fork. Long-and-low was what worked on the NORBA style courses of the day, biased towards climbing and speed on the flats. When you look at rider position, it’s not that far off of a ‘sporting’ road bike of the same era.

Modern MTBs have bigger wheels, longer travel suspension (with much better dampers) and the geometry and rider position to take advantage of that. I’ve demoed a couple of new mid-range trail bikes in the last year, and their off-road capability just blows away my old F-1000.
Now, on a fast fire road, or on slicks in the city, the old XC bike probably has the speed advantage, but that’s what it was designed to do.
Ironfish653 is offline  
Reply