View Single Post
Old 03-02-21 | 04:04 PM
  #13  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 12,721
Likes: 2,104
From: Madison, WI

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Originally Posted by djb
I realize I could have been clearer re 16 to 20t jumps between chainrings--what I really was referring to was the slightly annoying factor of having to shift a lot more gears at the back when you do a chainring change. .....
That is why I do not like the concept of a wide range 2X system.

My road bike is a 2X10 system with a compact double (50/34). I avoid two or three smallest sprockets on smallest chainring, two or three biggest sprockets on biggest chainring. Thus have 14 to 16 effective gears. After I shift the front, I have to make three shifts in back. And that change over point between the two chainrings is close enough to level ground that I make that change fairly frequently.

I have a similar situation on my half step plus granny triples on my derailleur touring bikes when shifting to or from the granny gear, but i do that much less frequently because that changeover occurs on a steeper grade.

My 3X8 rando bike with a stock (no aftermarket chainrings) road triple and stock 11/32 eight speed cassette is preferable in many ways, one of which is an effective 18 gears when avoiding the cross chained gears..
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Reply