View Single Post
Old 01-26-22 | 09:02 AM
  #9  
fishboat
Senior Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 821
From: SE Wisconsin

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Originally Posted by DorkDisk
The ride of these 600g steel forks is really nice. I'd go out of my way to track one down.
I was hoping for an end-run to get there..if I picked up a Stumpy M2 without a fork I could then pick up a ratty, but sound, donor Rockhopper or Hardrock-Ultra to get the fork. No such luck.

In the short term, if I wanted to obtain a no-fork Stumpy frame and build it up, there appears to be a couple fork options with Carver and Soma (and a number of others, but these two seem the most viable). Longer term is to track down an original fork, one way or another, or pick up a frame-fork set..

BF historical posts are a big help in figuring things out.
26 inch Rigid fork: Soma vs. Carver

The Soma looks nice, though this leads into the "how much does A to C variation impact handling?" question..which I'm researching now.

On a slightly different topic,
Does anyone have any thoughts on: In the 1991-1996 range, were suspended fork Stumpy frames any different than the rigid-fork frames or did they just mount a suspended fork on the same frame as the rigid bikes? They had fairly short travel suspended forks back then.

Great info folks..much appreciated.
fishboat is offline  
Reply