View Single Post
Old 04-28-22, 11:56 AM
  #28  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,930 Times in 2,555 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Read the quote:

The biggest thing is the weight factor because now you add 300-400 grams to the bike, so where are you going to lose that weight? Ultimately, you need to lose it on the frame or the wheels. That’s it, which means you need to get super light, once again pushing the boundaries there."

The cited issue is the extra weight of disc brakes, and having to lose that weight somewhere else on the bike. The situation would be the same with a dropper post - you'd have to lose the added weight somewhere else on the bike.
But even if the weights are the same, there is a big difference. You would only used the dropper post for races where it would help. Swapping it out is easy. Once on, the discs are always there.
79pmooney is offline