Originally Posted by Jimbo1983

I somewhat agree that having specific categories makes this place what it is, but there's specific and too specific. But we could argue our lifetimes away over what constitutes Classic and Vintage and what doesn't.

And that no one goes to that subforum does tell me something, it tells me it's in the wrong place. It was worth the experiment but if it's not popular enough to have a busy subforum then maybe it should be rolled back into C&V. There's a lot of cross-over with early brifter technology and the introduction and popularisation of other types of frame building and wheel/hub technologies etc which could still be considered C&V.