Thread: My reply.
View Single Post
Old 03-07-06 | 12:39 AM
  #33  
OneTinSloth
(Grouchy)
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,643
Likes: 1
the thing that people seem to be forgetting is that the criminal case should have been about the fact that the defendant struck torrin with his car, and then drove off and had to be cornered by witnesses before turning himself in. the blindness was a bodily injury, which could have increased the severity of the punishment, but hit and run is still a felony, with or without permanent injuries.
OneTinSloth is offline  
Reply