Old 06-20-23 | 01:00 PM
  #16  
maddog34's Avatar
maddog34
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 7,495
Likes: 3,300
From: NW Oregon

Bikes: 1982 Trek 930R Custom, '91 Diamondback Ascent w/ XT, XTR updates, Fuji Team Pro CF road flyer, Specialized Sirrus Gravel Convert, '09 Comencal Meta 5.5 XC, '02 Marin MBX500, '84 Gitane Criterium bike

Originally Posted by Bike Gremlin
Probably. Though, based on the picture(s), I'm not sure if the cage is also too high.

If that is the case, it's worth setting it correctly, and then testing if the shifting will be acceptably good (or acceptably bad ) for the rider.
there a 20 to 30 deg. divergence from the diameter of the large Chainring.. that's too much..... upshifts to the large ring will be sluggish and vague. the cage tail being that far back can, and often does, make the very noise Het Volk complained about.

now.. add the fact that the Advent Groups are meant for mostly MTB use... guess what usually happens when you shift an MTB front der. to the large ring of a compact road crankset? Cage rub on the small ring, which, in turn, limits outward range of motion.

and, in extreme cases, the "too high" tail bridge of the ft. der. can interfere with the chain... although this is more common on triple cranks...

Last edited by maddog34; 06-20-23 at 01:14 PM.
maddog34 is offline  
Reply