Originally Posted by
Koyote
I politely disagree: you have not shown us an example.
I'm not saying that I don't believe your assertion; rather, I just won't consider it until I see evidence (rather than hearsay).
...once the evidence is presented (as direct quotes), you will then proceed to discount it as "cherry picking". Sophistry has no limit, and that's not going to change. You have already proven this with me, in another thread. It's a tired old trolling technique, as are most of yours lately in these threads. Disguising it as rational argument does not change the nature of it. Let's just focus on your signature line...that's the money shot.