View Single Post
Old 03-18-24, 02:24 AM
  #432  
elcruxio
Senior Member
 
elcruxio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Turku, Finland, Europe
Posts: 2,510

Bikes: 2011 Specialized crux comp, 2013 Specialized Rockhopper Pro

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 230 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
Watch the comments in the video about installing car tires compared to bike tires and the reasoning that explains why car tires are perfectly safe, but hookless bike tires aren't.
https://youtu.be/WkqSgTu2SR8

Then watch this.
https://youtu.be/b8IiRrgdEZg?si=wgk9qt2mj1nLrBpG
I get your point. However that video showed us a small tire on a small rim and it still took the full weight of a grown man hopping on the tire to mount it. Hydraulic tire changer makes the job a lot easier, faster and safer for the tire and rim.

The point in the first video was, that if a hookless tire can be mounted tool free, ie. just by pushing with your fingers, it is not tight enough for it to really be safe.

Mounting tires is and should be much easier than taking them off. That is sorta the point why car rims are made the way they are, so that both beads cannot sit in the bead well at the same time. It is possible to take a car tire off a rim without power tools but you just need really long steel levers to do it.

There's one further major difference in car rims I failed to point out in my last reply on the subject. Car rims have a bead shelf (as tubeless has) that isn't level but is in fact an upwards slope (when looking at the cross section of the rim). When the tire is pressurized, the bead will move up that slope stretching itself tighter and tighter against the increasing circumference of the rim until it can't move up anymore. You'll end up with a really tight stretched seal against the rim. That slope is really useful, because it equates out manufacturing tolerances of tires. Some beads might rest a few mm. closer to the outside of the rim and some might rest bit closer to the inside, but they're all stretched against the rim with enough force to keep them in place.

The end result is that the tire should not come off unless the bead snaps (given how beefy the beads are, unlikely) or there's a rapid deflation and high enough sideways force to the tire (eg. cornering with too little pressure). Technically, you shouldn't need the flange on a tubeless car rim. However it's there and it is quite tall because it's a vital safety feature. If a tire does move, the flange stops it from moving too much or jumping off the rim.

Bicycle hookless rims have a bead shelf that's level. Granted, hooked TLR rims also have a bead shelf that's level but they also have a hook. Without a sloped bead shelf the tolerances need to be exact. If the bead circumference is too large and it doesn't seal against the bead shelf it'll have no choice but to seal against the flange, which is not what you want happening. You want that bead stretched tightly against the bead shelf. One problem that comes from the dimensions of bicycle rims is that they're so narrow that you don't really have enough space to create a slope that's gradual enough so that the tire won't just flop off as soon as pressure is released. Or rather road rims have this problem. With wide MTB rims or even fatbike rims you could achieve a proper slope easily.

I have come across one tire rim combo where I am absolutely positive it would have worked totally fine hookless with no safety issues whatsoever. The rim diameter was oversize and the tire undersize. In the end I needed a bench vise to pry the beads off the rim.

I realize that what I wrote above isn't exactly an endorsement for hooked TLR either. However hooked TLR has proven itself to be reliable and safe. The hook does a lot heavy lifting should the tire burp or move for some reason and it'll work as an additional sealing surface if it has to.
elcruxio is offline  
Likes For elcruxio: