View Single Post
Old 01-06-25 | 05:28 PM
  #57  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 12,727
Likes: 2,105
From: Madison, WI

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Originally Posted by adamrice
I heard back from Ian Walker. He didn't address my question about the moth effect directly. Here's what he said:
Thanks for posting.

On this forum, I have often commented that flashing lights, you can't get any depth perception where you can with constant on lights. But others on this forum have blasted me for saying anything that they perceived to be so stupid. The person you contacted did not specifically agree with my thoughts, word for word, but his comment (pasted):
.
...I suspect stationary lights are best for drivers knowing exactly where a cyclist is and how they are moving, and flashing lights are best for attracting attention to the cyclist in the first place...
.
sounds a lot like my thoughts. That is why I often use red rear facing flashers during daytime, and especially in fog or overcast conditions. But at night I only use constant on.



Tourist in MSN is offline  
Reply