Thread: Air Quality
View Single Post
Old 07-31-25 | 09:08 AM
  #7  
genejockey's Avatar
genejockey
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 23,773
Likes: 17,226
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

I'm in NorCal and we get our share of smoke days. I have found that Purple Air is better for tracking air quality, I always use the LRAPA conversion, and generally I won't ride outside if it's over 150. But I have no particular lung/breathing issues.

The advantage of Purple Air over Airnow.gov, for me, is the sheer number of sensors. It allows me to determine where exactly the smoke plumes may be, how they may be moving, etc, and the data are in real time. A couple years ago, we used the data to revise a route for the Monthly C&V ride, heading North into clear air rather than our usual route, where the air was bad.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is online now  
Reply