View Single Post
Old 08-13-25 | 11:57 AM
  #2  
Sierra_rider's Avatar
Sierra_rider
I climb a lot
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 5,404
From: NorCal

Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur 4 TR, Santa Cruz Hightower, Canyon Ultimate cf slx(x2), Canyon Endurace cf sl(rain bike,) Obed GVR, Ritchey Swiss Cross v3, Lauf Seigla rigid

It's mostly a matter of weight and geometry. The 120mm fork on my XC bike performs well enough for its intended riding terrain and keeps the weight to a minimum. The 160mm fork on my all-mountain bike weighs over a pound more.

As far as geometry, looking across the spectrum from XC to DH...the wheelbase gets longer, head tube angle gets slacker, front end sits higher, etc. There is a happy medium for each discipline in regards to geometry. I "over-forked" my all-mountain bike from the stock 150 to 160mm travel to make it sit even higher in the front. The "slack" geometry on my all-mountain bike works great for riding extremely technical terrain, however I wouldn't want to race an XC race on it and I even find it overkill on moderately technical terrain. The same could be said in reverse of my XC bike.
Sierra_rider is offline  
Reply