View Single Post
Old 01-01-26 | 12:54 PM
  #32  
maddog34's Avatar
maddog34
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 7,327
Likes: 3,195
From: NW Oregon

Bikes: 1982 Trek 930R Custom, '91 Diamondback Ascent w/ XT, XTR updates, Fuji Team Pro CF road flyer, Specialized Sirrus Gravel Convert, '09 Comencal Meta 5.5 XC, '02 Marin MBX500, '84 Gitane Criterium bike

Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
Stronglight made a roller bearing bottom bracket, way back in the cottered crank days. Two sets of rollers: one to handle axial loads, the other to handle radial loads. It never really caught on; reports were that it was very fussy about alignment.


https://thecabe.com/forum/threads/st...tation.247216/
roller bearings also introduce a lot of drag, compared to ball bearings.... and yep, getting that one above set up correctly would not be fun, especially considering MFG. slop and the ever-changing conditions bikes experience...
those thrust bearings are overkill, IMO.. a plain bi-metal bushing would be enough, i'd think.
the loading is more a twist than a side shift.

tapered rollers see-saw, or "slider rocker", under odd, twisting loadings, are expensive to make, need to be paired as an assembly. and are fairly high drag too.
maddog34 is offline  
Reply