View Single Post
Old 01-01-26 | 02:00 PM
  #34  
maddog34's Avatar
maddog34
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 7,327
Likes: 3,195
From: NW Oregon

Bikes: 1982 Trek 930R Custom, '91 Diamondback Ascent w/ XT, XTR updates, Fuji Team Pro CF road flyer, Specialized Sirrus Gravel Convert, '09 Comencal Meta 5.5 XC, '02 Marin MBX500, '84 Gitane Criterium bike

Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
Yeah, that's why I think rollers are more appropriate for a headset than a bottom bracket. Unlike bottom brackets, or other bicycle bearings, for that matter, headsets are not in continuous rotation when in use, so the additional friction is far less pertinent.
under extreme pressures/shocking, small, "Low Count" roller bearings can shatter.
automotive U-joints use longer needle bearings, and as many as they can fit in the cups... they are also low rotation, low twisting load, and high friction.
i've watched people try to re-use a cup after screwing one up on a new u-joint... the cups are matched to the assembly, and shouldn't be reused on a different assembly.

the precision bearings honda uses in their transmissions and engines, in general, come in varying tolerances, depending on WHERE they're used... a tight press fit into a casting compresses the outer race... retainer installs were tighter than press fits...etc.
we would carefully measure the crank bearing bores in the cases, after normalizing the case temp, before ordering the correct toyo crank bearings for race engines.
maddog34 is offline  
Reply