View Single Post
Old 02-22-26 | 03:31 PM
  #104  
Sierra_rider's Avatar
Sierra_rider
I climb a lot
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 5,484
From: NorCal

Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur 4 TR, Santa Cruz Hightower, Canyon Ultimate cf slx(x2), Canyon Endurace cf sl(rain bike,) Obed GVR, Ritchey Swiss Cross v3, Lauf Seigla rigid

Originally Posted by Jughed
In my mind - no.

There are plenty of athletes that don’t do the work to become elite.

I guess I base it on built in abilities vs what one does with said abilities.

I understand the technical or official definition doesn’t agree… no matter how hard I was to train, no matter how many miles I rode - my peak VO2 max wouldn’t reach the off the shelf numbers of a natural born athlete.

is: "I play real sports. Not trying to be the best at exercising."
Kenny Powers!!
I see athleticism as being spectrum, rather than just something you are or you aren't. I'd say the ones that aren't athletes are the ones that are just sitting on the couch, pissing their lives away. On the opposite end of the spectrum, lie the people that are both physiologically gifted and who put in the work. The rest of us are scattered in between.

In my own case, I do have some things that are beneficial for cycling performance(lung volume, hip mobility, femur length,) yet I also have an over-built musculoskeletal system that that would be more beneficial for a contact sport. Despite having a build that would be great for many stick and ball sports, my poor coordination means that I've pretty much sucked at every conventional sport I've tried. Get me on a MTB in technical terrain, I feel poised...put me on a basketball court and I have the foot work of a baby deer.

Last edited by Sierra_rider; 02-23-26 at 02:15 PM. Reason: bad grammar
Sierra_rider is offline  
Reply