View Single Post
Old 04-25-26 | 01:24 PM
  #53  
Cruiser7's Avatar
Cruiser7
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 35
Likes: 16
Originally Posted by Atlas Shrugged
This video discusses why modern professional cycling, specifically the Paris-Roubaix race, has become significantly faster due to technological advancements and increased energy transfer. The primary premises offered include:

• Increased Racing Speeds: The speaker notes that the average speed of Paris-Roubaix has increased from approximately 40 kph in 2000 to nearly 49 kph in recent years, with speeds in the famous Arenberg Forest sector increasing to the point where riders hit cobbles with 83% more kinetic energy than in the past (0:39-2:58).

• Technological System Gains: Modern equipment—including advancements in tire technology particularly moving away from tubulars, aerodynamic frames, and drivetrain efficiency—contributes to a cumulative speed advantage of 80–90 watts compared to bikes used 25 years ago (2:59-8:14).

• The 'Energy Problem' vs. Equipment Problem: The speaker argues that the mechanical challenges faced by riders today, such as equipment failure or difficulty managing tire pressure, are a result of this massive increase in kinetic energy rather than a flaw in the equipment itself (8:14-9:18).

• The Icarus Problem: There is a tradeoff between tire pressure and rim safety; riders often cannot optimize tire pressures for the roughest cobbled sections because they are limited by current tire size constraints (typically 36-38mm), forcing a compromise between speed and durability (9:18-10:11).

• Strategy Shift: These technical gains have fundamentally changed race strategy, allowing riders to accelerate and maintain higher speeds on the cobbles rather than just surviving the sections (12:13-12:35).

Contrary to the often quoted belief that modern bikes are not significantly quicker than bikes of the past this video offers a compelling argument. This does not even take into account the increased comfort and reliability modern bicycles offer.
https://youtu.be/zE9Rxivm6PE?si=N8IQaExklKxKtxsq
This comment was posted in the video you suggest; does it make tooooooooooo much sense?....

Instead of using high volume tires at low pressures, would it not be more optimal to use some form of actual, real suspension (maybe even tunable) plus lower volume tires at higher pressures to prevent flats? Formula 1 cars use suspension to go faster on the smoothest tracks in the world, so why don't racing bikes use suspension, especially on roads like these? Air-filled tires seems like a VERY PRIMITIVE form of suspension, which has the downsides highlighted by this race. I know suspension has been used previously in Paris-Roubaix, so why are high volume tires now seen as a better solution?
Cruiser7 is offline  
Reply