Originally Posted by matagi
Yeah, but it's an extension of the same thing - and who cares anyway? The guy has retired, he was never caught, so why are people still going on about it? Like he's the only cyclist in the history of cycling to use performance enhancing substances and not be caught?
Maybe he is as clean as a whistle, and maybe he is not, but in the absence of hard evidence to indicate he used performance enhancing substances, it is all becoming a little tedious. (and no, I am not a Lance fan by any means)
its because hes adament to the point of being very litigous that hes clean. the more he insists, the more that ppl are going to try and find fault.
this would be the drawback of winning 7 straight TDF's, esp after cancer. any other successfull racer would not have drawn this much interest without the 2 above pre requesits.