The right Crit bike?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Bernardino
Posts: 25
Bikes: 95' Cannondale R800, 02' Trek Fuel 80, mid 80's Trek 5200, FIT Edwin Delarosa
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The right Crit bike?
Sorry to post another thread with this played out ?, but all the threads iv'e found were pretty old and wasn't regarding 11' -12' models. I'm looking to get into mostly Crits with some raod rcng and am looking for the right bike. I have it narrowed down to these 4: Madone 4.5, Supersix 5, Felt F5 or if its worth it to spend the extra $ the R3.
Im 5'8", 180 lbs, more of a sprinter than climber. Thanks everyone!
Im 5'8", 180 lbs, more of a sprinter than climber. Thanks everyone!
#2
i got nothing.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cali Forn NI A (SoCal)
Posts: 5,723
Bikes: 13 BH G6 with SRAM Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Caad 10....much more disposable and a great race bike.
__________________
14 days...
14 days...
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 965
Bikes: 2012 Parlee Z5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sorry to post another thread with this played out ?, but all the threads iv'e found were pretty old and wasn't regarding 11' -12' models. I'm looking to get into mostly Crits with some raod rcng and am looking for the right bike. I have it narrowed down to these 4: Madone 4.5, Supersix 5, Felt F5 or if its worth it to spend the extra $ the R3.
Im 5'8", 180 lbs, more of a sprinter than climber. Thanks everyone!
Im 5'8", 180 lbs, more of a sprinter than climber. Thanks everyone!
#4
coffee-stained punk
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Sorry to post another thread with this played out ?, but all the threads iv'e found were pretty old and wasn't regarding 11' -12' models. I'm looking to get into mostly Crits with some raod rcng and am looking for the right bike. I have it narrowed down to these 4: Madone 4.5, Supersix 5, Felt F5 or if its worth it to spend the extra $ the R3.
Im 5'8", 180 lbs, more of a sprinter than climber. Thanks everyone!
Im 5'8", 180 lbs, more of a sprinter than climber. Thanks everyone!
#5
Making a kilometer blurry
All those mentioned above will suit you well.
RX won a TX state crit championship on a Fuji SST, and I've won a handful of crits on mine. Fujis seem to be a solid value. Several teammates and I are riding them with good experiences.
I don't think you're going to find much fault with any real race bikes in a crit. Make sure it allows an aggressive position. Consider narrower bars, as many prefer them for squeezing through tight spots in crits.
RX won a TX state crit championship on a Fuji SST, and I've won a handful of crits on mine. Fujis seem to be a solid value. Several teammates and I are riding them with good experiences.
I don't think you're going to find much fault with any real race bikes in a crit. Make sure it allows an aggressive position. Consider narrower bars, as many prefer them for squeezing through tight spots in crits.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Bernardino
Posts: 25
Bikes: 95' Cannondale R800, 02' Trek Fuel 80, mid 80's Trek 5200, FIT Edwin Delarosa
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
All those mentioned above will suit you well.
RX won a TX state crit championship on a Fuji SST, and I've won a handful of crits on mine. Fujis seem to be a solid value. Several teammates and I are riding them with good experiences.
I don't think you're going to find much fault with any real race bikes in a crit. Make sure it allows an aggressive position. Consider narrower bars, as many prefer them for squeezing through tight spots in crits.
RX won a TX state crit championship on a Fuji SST, and I've won a handful of crits on mine. Fujis seem to be a solid value. Several teammates and I are riding them with good experiences.
I don't think you're going to find much fault with any real race bikes in a crit. Make sure it allows an aggressive position. Consider narrower bars, as many prefer them for squeezing through tight spots in crits.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm a much better criterium racer than a road racer. I ride a 2010 Felt F5 with DA7900 and it's the perfect crit bike for me. Super quick handling yet very stable, standard non-compact geometry, and reasonable weight (14.8lbs with race wheels). If I had to replace it right now I'd choose an F1.
Good luck, and remember, it's not about the bike.
Good luck, and remember, it's not about the bike.
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Bernardino
Posts: 25
Bikes: 95' Cannondale R800, 02' Trek Fuel 80, mid 80's Trek 5200, FIT Edwin Delarosa
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have heard this a few times before. Im on mid 90's Cannondale R800 2.8 now and its treated me good. Its not the lightest bike but compared to what I had before this, its a feather. Maybe Iv'e just fell into the "carbon is better than all" belief. But if i'm not spending the extra $ on Hi-Mod carbon, would a premium Alum. frame be better than a lower grade Carbon frame?
#9
starting pistol means war
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: Cervelo R3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
anything that doesn't feel squishy around a corner will do you just fine
all those bikes are good
pick wheels that can handle your power and weight
lightweight wheels are not going to do you much good
i'm 6'2" and race anywhere 175-195 lbs
i destroy wheels, so pick wisely
all those bikes are good
pick wheels that can handle your power and weight
lightweight wheels are not going to do you much good
i'm 6'2" and race anywhere 175-195 lbs
i destroy wheels, so pick wisely
#10
Elite Fred
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edge City
Posts: 10,945
Bikes: 2009 Spooky (cracked frame), 2006 Curtlo, 2002 Lemond (current race bike) Zurich, 1987 Serotta Colorado, 1986 Cannondale for commuting, a 1984 Cannondale on loan to my son
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times
in
19 Posts
Get a bike that you like to train on and then race it. Winning and losing is more about training and race experience than equipment.
Worry about equipment details when you are losing races by inches.
Worry about equipment details when you are losing races by inches.
#12
i got nothing.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cali Forn NI A (SoCal)
Posts: 5,723
Bikes: 13 BH G6 with SRAM Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have heard this a few times before. Im on mid 90's Cannondale R800 2.8 now and its treated me good. Its not the lightest bike but compared to what I had before this, its a feather. Maybe Iv'e just fell into the "carbon is better than all" belief. But if i'm not spending the extra $ on Hi-Mod carbon, would a premium Alum. frame be better than a lower grade Carbon frame?
and this in my garage..
now I only own this…
I rode them both back to back for almost 3 weeks..both same size, same build up with parts, and in the end couldn't justify keeping the SS Himod…it's a great bike, but if i throw the SS down the road it's 2k out of my pocket vice $900 for a new CAAD10 frame. they are both so close in ride quality I just couldn't keep the SS. Being a crit racer myself, the extra 1 lbs or so just doesn't matter enough to sell me on the SS.
__________________
14 days...
14 days...
#13
Fly on the wall
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 981
Bikes: a few
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Crash, what bars are those?
And OP, my Alu Caad 10 has been great so far. The BB is a bit finicky, but a little squeaking now and again is my biggest issue.
And OP, my Alu Caad 10 has been great so far. The BB is a bit finicky, but a little squeaking now and again is my biggest issue.
#14
i got nothing.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cali Forn NI A (SoCal)
Posts: 5,723
Bikes: 13 BH G6 with SRAM Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think they are FSA wingpro compacts? Either that or the Specialized short and shallow drop bar…very close to each other but the Spec is about 5mm shorter on reach.
__________________
14 days...
14 days...
#15
i got nothing.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cali Forn NI A (SoCal)
Posts: 5,723
Bikes: 13 BH G6 with SRAM Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#17
Fly on the wall
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 981
Bikes: a few
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My bearings needed replacing 3 months after I bought the bike. A few weeks later it creaks now and again. I hear the BB30 has narrow tolerances and that can happen now and again. (or so I've been told)
I've heard that either a certain type of locktite or changing the bearings will fix the creaking.
Either way I do love the frame and would still do it all over again given the chance.
I've heard that either a certain type of locktite or changing the bearings will fix the creaking.
Either way I do love the frame and would still do it all over again given the chance.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 373
Bikes: Giant TCR and Giant TCX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No such thing as a "crit bike" and those that say they have one I stay away from. It means they plan on crashing it, hence why most make them out of aluminum. Get a decent race bike, don't be an idiot in the peloton and you'll be fine.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 170
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have both a CAAD10 and SS Hi-mod....the SS jumps better and climbs better...the C10 has better roll speed, dunno way. Oddly enough, all my best race results have been on the C10.
Off topic-The SS ceramic BB bearings lasted 2 weks...replaced with FSA standards and lasted all year, quiet and spin great.
Off topic-The SS ceramic BB bearings lasted 2 weks...replaced with FSA standards and lasted all year, quiet and spin great.
#20
Making a kilometer blurry
FWIW, aluminum being more crash-worthy than CF is becoming a myth. CF is the most economically repairable frame material, by far. I have a friend with broken chain stays on his Orbea opal. $400 at KirkLee repaired the stays and painted to match the stripes. Two years of racing has gone by, and he still loves the frame. If it was aluminum, it would be in the trash, and replaced with a frame that cost much more than $400.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,840
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OP - if you're asking this ? i'm assuming your a new racer. IMO the best bike for a new racer is the one you ride right now. if you want to buy a new bike for the enjoyment, i'd confidently recommend the caad10 to anyone, but as long as your existing bicycle is in good maintenance, dont think you need a new bike to race.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 373
Bikes: Giant TCR and Giant TCX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
FWIW, aluminum being more crash-worthy than CF is becoming a myth. CF is the most economically repairable frame material, by far. I have a friend with broken chain stays on his Orbea opal. $400 at KirkLee repaired the stays and painted to match the stripes. Two years of racing has gone by, and he still loves the frame. If it was aluminum, it would be in the trash, and replaced with a frame that cost much more than $400.
#24
Senior Member
Fit, remember the fit. Mentioned above, I'll repeat it. Without a proper fitting bike you won't be happy. You may get by but you won't be happy.
Fit also changes as you get more fit... err conditioned. You'll start out with your bars slightly higher and closer, later moving to a longer, lower position. I helped one of my teammates adjust his fit after a couple years of racing. It was pretty dramatic.
As far as the old school myths on short wheelbase, steep angles, all that, I think it's phooey balooey. I subscribed to those ideas much earlier, but as I gained experience with different geometries and such I found that a predictable front end worked best for me - predictable enough to ride one or no handed, stable enough at 55 mph, turns in fine in a crit. For me that means a 73 deg headtube angle, about 43mm rake. It's a standard Cannondale geometry, and I'm sure it's on many other frames. It works and I spec'ed it on my two current frames.
I do think that a short chainstay helps with out of the saddle movement. Going from a 40.5 cm chainstay (standard length for most road bikes) to a 39 cm chainstay - world of difference. Even though I have a long wheelbase frame (due to the long top tube), it reacts very quickly due to the headtube angle and the short stays.
Unfortunately short stays are a custom thing. You can get an aluminum frame, custom geometry, for about $800 (I did), but if you're not sure about what you want, it'll probably be a better idea to start on a factory frame. If you have a 29" inseam like me (I'm 5'7", similar in weight to you) then you should consider a custom frame from the start. I have two frames - one has the 40.5 chainstay, my preferred setup has the 39 cm chainstay (I'm having the 40.5 shortened to 39 this winter). Other than that both frames are the same geometry-wise. My top tube is similar to a 56-58 cm frame, my seat tube is more for a 48-50 cm frame (it's actually closer to 40 cm due to my personal preference).
I pretty much only do crits. They are the best races for those that aren't fit but who know how to ride in a group. In pure fitness I suck, therefore I can't contest anything that goes uphill too long or involves time trialing. Pack riding and tactics, that's all me.
Fit also changes as you get more fit... err conditioned. You'll start out with your bars slightly higher and closer, later moving to a longer, lower position. I helped one of my teammates adjust his fit after a couple years of racing. It was pretty dramatic.
As far as the old school myths on short wheelbase, steep angles, all that, I think it's phooey balooey. I subscribed to those ideas much earlier, but as I gained experience with different geometries and such I found that a predictable front end worked best for me - predictable enough to ride one or no handed, stable enough at 55 mph, turns in fine in a crit. For me that means a 73 deg headtube angle, about 43mm rake. It's a standard Cannondale geometry, and I'm sure it's on many other frames. It works and I spec'ed it on my two current frames.
I do think that a short chainstay helps with out of the saddle movement. Going from a 40.5 cm chainstay (standard length for most road bikes) to a 39 cm chainstay - world of difference. Even though I have a long wheelbase frame (due to the long top tube), it reacts very quickly due to the headtube angle and the short stays.
Unfortunately short stays are a custom thing. You can get an aluminum frame, custom geometry, for about $800 (I did), but if you're not sure about what you want, it'll probably be a better idea to start on a factory frame. If you have a 29" inseam like me (I'm 5'7", similar in weight to you) then you should consider a custom frame from the start. I have two frames - one has the 40.5 chainstay, my preferred setup has the 39 cm chainstay (I'm having the 40.5 shortened to 39 this winter). Other than that both frames are the same geometry-wise. My top tube is similar to a 56-58 cm frame, my seat tube is more for a 48-50 cm frame (it's actually closer to 40 cm due to my personal preference).
I pretty much only do crits. They are the best races for those that aren't fit but who know how to ride in a group. In pure fitness I suck, therefore I can't contest anything that goes uphill too long or involves time trialing. Pack riding and tactics, that's all me.
#25
i got nothing.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cali Forn NI A (SoCal)
Posts: 5,723
Bikes: 13 BH G6 with SRAM Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts