View Single Post
Old 07-18-07, 09:39 AM
  #13  
fprintf
Better rider 20 yrs ago
 
fprintf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cheshire, Connecticut, USA
Posts: 378

Bikes: Trek 1500D

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Keith99
Wrong.
According to the link previously given, they say
Measuring the distance along the surface of the road (c) instead of horizontally (b) gives practically
the same result for most road gradients up to 10%. For instance, a 20% grade (11.3 degrees), measuring
along the road surface gives a 19.6% grade (you must have a tangent handbook or calculator to properly
calculate these figures).
fprintf is offline