View Single Post
Old 01-16-09 | 08:24 AM
  #6  
pawn
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Schwinnrider
I've been on this forum for several years, and I've noticed a trend.

This is the commuting forum. Commuting is generally defined to be the act of travelling from one's residence to one's place of work or study. So, when you ride your bike to work or school---that's "bike commuting".

When you ride your bike to do your shopping, that's not commuting. That's running an errand.


Riding to the Obama inauguration, a wedding, or a friend's house is not commuting. It may be still considered running an errand, but it's not commuting. After all, if we drove to those places we wouldn't call it car commuting. Driving to work or school is car commuting, though. So is taking mass transit.

So would it kill people to post threads like "Riding your bike to X location" instead of "Bike commute to X location"? That is a more accurate description of the act.

I like riding my bike, but there's no need to label every single ride. Sometimes a ride is just a ride.
I call BS on this one. Anywhere you go that serves a purpose is commuting...as in "I commuted to the grocery store to run a few errands by bike, because otherwise I would have driven my car." Or, "I commuted to the Obama inauguration by bike, because otherwise I would have driven my car...or perhaps commuted by bus or train."

Really though, anywhere you go on bike could be considered a commute if there is a definite endpoint at where you will be off bike doing something for a little while, only to get back on bike and ride home.

Everyone has their definitions.
pawn is offline  
Reply