View Single Post
Old 06-02-09 | 04:33 PM
  #43  
cyclinfool's Avatar
cyclinfool
gone ride'n
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,050
Likes: 2
From: Upstate NY

Bikes: Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac

Originally Posted by noglider
I'm going to go against conventional wisdom. Sorry. Higher cadences do not reduce the amount of work you do. They increase it.
High cadences are fine for flats and downhills but I think they are bad for vigorous climbs.
Interesting perspective. For smaller hills where I can keep a high cadence and power through it - it works. For longer hills I just can't spin at 100+ for an hour, the moment you let off for just a second your cadence drops and if you are at the end of your gears your done.

I have been biking pretty much regularly since I was a 4 YO - but only seriously in the last 3 years. What I mean by seriously is in groups where I have actually been trying to keep up as opposed to just out for the ride - a relatively new type of riding for me. What I have found on hills is that if you loose your momentum it's grind time - which is just demoralizing. Last year by the time Aug came around I was in rare form, was doing hill repeats on an 8% 1000' hill at 9mph. I lost my conditioning over the winter and it's frustrating. But it's coming back.
cyclinfool is offline  
Reply