Old 07-17-09 | 01:00 PM
  #5  
jtgotsjets
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 3
From: Toronto, Ontario

Bikes: Miele Azsora, Kuwahara Cascade

Originally Posted by Doohickie
Actually, it makes more sense from a structural standpoint. Most of your weight goes through your "sit bones" which (for me at least) settle in at about the widest part of the seat. Putting the clamp that way positions the sit bone contact point directly over the seatpost. Doing it the "modern" way is more aesthetically pleasing to our eyes, but it ends up meaning the load is further aft of the seatpost and the seat has to carry higher bending load along with the vertical load. The old pictures are correct from a structural efficiency standpoint, but it looks dorky to us today.
Really? I'm having a hard time conceptualizing how the orientation of the clamp would affect how weight was distributed; the seat would stay in the same relative position over the post, no? Otherwise it'd affect fit.

Maybe I'm just confused about what is being talked about.
jtgotsjets is offline  
Reply