Thread: One for Joe
View Single Post
Old 07-28-09 | 05:50 PM
  #31  
Picchio Special
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 15
From: Lancaster County, PA

Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis

Originally Posted by Mike Mills
The "Shakers" would purposefully place an imperfection in everything they made. This was to keep them from the pursuiit of perfection, which was deemed to be prideful, willful and an attempt to make oneself God-like; God being the only One who can be or make perfection.
That lone imperfection can easily be adapted to one's concept of perfection: "Perfection" merely expands to embrace it. The question is whether the ego comes along for the ride. The Shakers seem to have known what they were doing, but while the chairs are fairly easy to "read," the heart is not. Were those gargoyle carvers who contributed their work to the great cathedrals of Europe - and who's attention to detail would never find an audience among the hell-fearing public - carving to such a high standard ad majorem dei gloriam? Or for the eyes of their fellow craftsmen and the skilled maintenance folk who would toil face-to-face with their work? Does it matter?
Picchio Special is offline  
Reply