One for Joe
#26
The only way I could even enjoy riding this bike is if I was loaded with cash and the purchase was not considered "expensive".
I would be worried way too much to actually have fun on the thing... With that said, I would probably enjoy it after I scraped it on something.
I would be worried way too much to actually have fun on the thing... With that said, I would probably enjoy it after I scraped it on something.
#27
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 2
LOL! You are thinking exactly like me. I think the first thing I would do is scratch it - on purpose.
If you can't ride it, what good is it. Bicycles are not "art", they are machines. Their highest state of perfection is to be used for what they were designed - to be ridden.
The "Shakers" would purposefully place an imperfection in everything they made. This was to keep them from the pursuiit of perfection, which was deemed to be prideful, willful and an attempt to make oneself God-like; God being the only One who can be or make perfection.
If you can't ride it, what good is it. Bicycles are not "art", they are machines. Their highest state of perfection is to be used for what they were designed - to be ridden.
The "Shakers" would purposefully place an imperfection in everything they made. This was to keep them from the pursuiit of perfection, which was deemed to be prideful, willful and an attempt to make oneself God-like; God being the only One who can be or make perfection.
#29
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 15
From: Lancaster County, PA
Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
Depends. Many were built to be raced. Many are past their racing life. Most of us can't push them anywhere near their intended limits anyway. Some people collect old tools. But I don't believe an old hammer is necessarily crying out for a handmade nail, or an old saw for old growth timber. In general I agree, but I also think it's OK to collect and enjoy old things, especially handmade ones, simply for the skill that went into them or the history they represent and embody or the aesthetic enjoyment they bring or the wealth of detail they reveal. While I have no problem with riding old bikes - even rare and expensive ones - I don't quite get the mentality that says they must be ridden else some higher purpose be thwarted. No, they're not art, but cool old things can still be cool even when they're not used. The "highest state of perfection" stuff gets a little numinous for me. (Some Shaker furniture is in museums where I can enjoy it without being able to sit on it. To me that's OK.)
#30
www.theheadbadge.com



Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29,001
Likes: 5,486
From: Southern Florida
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
The "Shakers" would purposefully place an imperfection in everything they made. This was to keep them from the pursuiit of perfection, which was deemed to be prideful, willful and an attempt to make oneself God-like; God being the only One who can be or make perfection.

Since when did Yehuda and the Kickstand Cyclery pop in?
-Kurt
#31
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 15
From: Lancaster County, PA
Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
The "Shakers" would purposefully place an imperfection in everything they made. This was to keep them from the pursuiit of perfection, which was deemed to be prideful, willful and an attempt to make oneself God-like; God being the only One who can be or make perfection.
#33
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 15
From: Lancaster County, PA
Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
#38
Rustbelt Rider
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,105
Likes: 388
From: Canton, OH
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
Yeah, Joe is still busy with his digital camera owner's manual. I am surprised to see he hasn't checked in here yet. Some interesting conversation though.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
#39
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 15
From: Lancaster County, PA
Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
#41
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,795
Likes: 3,697
Upon review I am not certain it sold. Or maybe not through ebay. Earlier in the day it had six offers, the closed offer page still shows six offers. Maybe I am wrong but wouldn't there not have been a seventh offer to conclude the sale? There were I think two offers from what appears to be the same person. We may never know. If it had seven offers and was concluded it would be more indicative to me that it sold for the price, or if the page stated this offer ended with Buy-it-now.
If anyone followed the offer on their my ebay page, what did it show?
If anyone followed the offer on their my ebay page, what did it show?








