Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Why kids don't ride to school.

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Why kids don't ride to school.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-05, 07:39 PM
  #26  
Tom (ex)Builder
 
twahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 2,814

Bikes: Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
I know that parents and schools teach children how to avoid and handle dangers such as crime and traffic. It seems that at a certain age, bike riding to school would be safe enough. Do you think it might be reasonable for schools to encourage bike commuting for middle school children (say over age 10 or 12)?
Sure kids are taught, but putting myself in the mindset of a predator, I've never met a kid under 14 that I couldn't overcome and slam into a car in a matter of seconds. About 14, I've seen some damn big kids...

Keeping in mind that the predation and traffic safety are separate issues please...

Yes, I would love to see kids encouraged to bike commute. There is however one major intersection between my home and the elementary school where my daughter goes, and two major roads between here and the middle school where my son goes. If they could ride sidewalk I'd maybe fight for it, but I discourage that with my kids as much as practicable, and the street routes are very very busy at that time of day. There's also a commuter bus stop without shelter along the sidewalk route, and there tend to be quite a few adults milling about in the mornings. As I mentioned before...my sone rides an Allez, my daughter a Sirrus, and I'd really rather not have them ridden to and locked up outside the school.

My daughter will be going to a different middle school next year, having been accepted into a Math & Science program, and that trip would be out of the question both due to distance (well over 15 miles) and
LOTS of major roads that are very busy with morning commute traffic.

I don't think the policy here is district wide, I believe it's up to the individual school to determine whether or not to allow kids to ride bikes to school based on where their students are coming from in relation to traffic patterns. Some of the schools in the district would be just fine for the kids to commute to.
__________________
Tom

"It hurts so good..."
twahl is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 07:41 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
RocketsRedglare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newport Beach
Posts: 275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My wife has adult onset, type one diabetes (juvenile diabetes) she contracted it when she was 30. Horrible disease thas you wouldn't want to wish on anyone. She has always been excellent shape, and always maintained (and still does) a rigorous excercise routine. She is on an insulin pump is constantly monitoring her blood sugars, But even still here blood sugars occasionally drop to the point were she goes into a seizure. In a best case scenerio, she comes out of it when you give here tons of sugar. In a worse case, its a ambulance ride to the ER.

Heading of a thread hijack:

What I've noticed living in SoCal and Long Island, where there is a huge gap between the "haves" and the "have nots", is that for the most part, the "haves" tend to be in better physical shape. Its kind of obvious that kids in the Haves have access to safe neighborhoods have access to, have good diet and are involved in many extracurricular activites.

The biggest factor seems to be that "haves" parents are much more motivated and involved in their kids lives.

But ironically its the kids in the poor neighborhoods that cycle to school. The rich kids all have mommy drop them off in their SUVs.

Sheesh
RocketsRedglare is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 07:45 PM
  #28  
Tom (ex)Builder
 
twahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 2,814

Bikes: Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
Also, do any schools have bike clubs where kids can learn about riding fun and safety?
You know I missed this part the first time around. Our middle school seems to be very open to starting clubs based on the kid's interests. I think I'll see if I can talk Jason into getting the right teacher sponsorship to start a cycling club. I'd be more than happy to volunteer. He loves to ride...rode with the lead pack on our last club ride, averaged something over 14 MPH on a 30 mile ride. I was behind with my daughter and didn't see him most of the day, but several members made it a point to seek me out, and tell me how well he did, not just in keeping up, but also in his riding etiquette and overall manners.
__________________
Tom

"It hurts so good..."
twahl is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 07:56 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
RocketsRedglare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newport Beach
Posts: 275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
this is good. Parents involved and doing something about it. Good job, twahl
RocketsRedglare is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 09:04 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Dchiefransom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 6,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by DieselDan
Juvineile diabetes (type 1) is HERIDITARY, there is nothing a child can do about but treat it then die from it. To blame this on a lifestyle choice is cruel and inhumane.

Schools took bike racks out and banned bikes over liability issues. Kid rides bike to school, bike is stolen at school, school is sued by parents.
There ya go!!! In an article on this in my local paper, replacing stolen bikes constantly was the number one reason why kids didn't ride their bikes to school. At least our Jr High and High School have a fenced area with the bikes locked inside during school hours.
Dchiefransom is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 09:09 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Dchiefransom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 6,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by UCSDbikeAnarchy
The San Diego Union tribune has a feature article on why kids don't ride their bikes to school anymore. Article

among reasons cited are fears about traffic and abductions, which are totally unfounded.

"
Yup, TOTALLY unfounded. My paper was covering the kidnapping of a girl off the street on her way to school in Vallejo, kept in a closet in San Jose, and "rented out" to other pedophiles for a couple of months, before the guy finally killed her. They found out because he's confessed after being convicted of another kidnapping where the girl got away eventually. This is a continuous assault of info on the senses.
Dchiefransom is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 09:18 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
* jack *'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 1,514

Bikes: more, please.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Help organize a Safe Routes to School program in your community:

https://www.saferoutestoschools.org/
* jack * is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 09:41 PM
  #33  
Tom (ex)Builder
 
twahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 2,814

Bikes: Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by * jack *
Help organize a Safe Routes to School program in your community:

https://www.saferoutestoschools.org/
I've visited that site and found it interesting, but there's no way around at least a busy 4 lane road between me and the school. I'm kind of boxed in between an interstate, the primary artery through the county, a 4 lane feeder, and Bull Run, which seperates us from Fairfax county. It's kind of discouraging really, but hey, my kids ride. Just not to school.
__________________
Tom

"It hurts so good..."
twahl is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 10:03 PM
  #34  
Spoked to Death
 
phidauex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,335

Bikes: Salsa La Cruz w/ Alfine 8, Specialized Fuse Pro 27.5+, Surly 1x1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Ok, since it caused a bit of a flareup, let me rephrase! Instead of saying 'juvenile diabetes' is affected by lifestyle choice, I mean to say, 'juvenile onset type-2 diabetes' is affected by lifestyle choice. Yes, I know they are different diseases, but my point stands. Doctors are seeing so called 'adult onset' diabetes in younger and younger patients, including children, and this change seems to be brought about by changes in lifestyle, including diet and exercise, which not only affect whether or not someone will contract type-2, but also when they contract it. If someone has a strong genetic risk factor, their lifestyle choices might make the difference between onset at 12 and onset at 55, which means a lot for their life.

Asthma isn't 'lifestyle' related in the same way, since diet and exercise aren't as big of risk factors. However, it is related to lifestyle in that air pollution is a major risk factor for asthma, and choosing to operate cars more than may be necessary is a lifestyle choice that can exacerbate asthma problems, though that occurs on a community level, rather than an individual level.

Does that help? I'm certainly not wishing these diseases upon anyone, and I'm well aware of the fact that there are many things that contribute to whether or not someone contracts a disease, and that one can't immediately 'blame' a person for their own disease. However, one can't discount the risk factors that people DO have control over, and lament their frequent ignorance or outright defiance of that. I have family members with diabetes too, and my comments weren't meant to be crass or insensitive.

You are your body, and every choice you makes affects it. There are some things you don't get to choose, and some you do.

peace,
sam
phidauex is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 10:07 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
arboc!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 1,460

Bikes: specialized p.1, redline single x

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i think kids dont ride bikes as much because...
1.they dont want their nice bike getting jacked
2. they dont want people ****ing with their bikes
3. ?
arboc! is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 10:09 PM
  #36  
Spoked to Death
 
phidauex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,335

Bikes: Salsa La Cruz w/ Alfine 8, Specialized Fuse Pro 27.5+, Surly 1x1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/projects/cda2.htm

Some info from the CDC about the increased prevalence of early onset type-2 diabetes in people aged 10 to 19, noting correlation between obseity and low physical activity, as well as other factors like exposure to diabetes in uetero.

peace,
sam
phidauex is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 10:24 PM
  #37  
Dominatrikes
 
sbhikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920

Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That is so sad that schools take away the bike lock facilities and don't allow kids to ride to school. One of the best things is getting a bike and finally having the freedom over your own mobility.

When I was a kid a lot of horrible, newsworthy things happened to me and people I know. The difference between then and now is back then you didn't talk about it.

I think kids should be forced to ride to school. Put crossing guards at those busy intersections and give them the authority to stop traffic in all directions. The only exception to forcing kids to ride to school is please don't force 13 year old (or so) girls. At that age, riding a bike is complete torture, fraught with opportunities for total, feminine humiliation.
sbhikes is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 11:27 PM
  #38  
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Do you think forcing them to ride would take away some of the fun?
Roody is offline  
Old 04-25-05, 11:54 PM
  #39  
Work hard, Play hard
 
forum*rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,596

Bikes: Cannondale super V 500, Bianchi Piaggio(hopefully getting a new road bike when I get some money)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ride to school, as do alot of my friends. Most of them ride because it's their means of transportation, my parents are gone in the morning and don't come home until around 6pm, so if I want to get to school, go to a friends house, whatever I have to ride.

Fortunately for me my ride is fairly safe, most of it is on an enclosed bike path(concrete walls seperate the bike path from the 56 freeway) and then it's a short stretch on a 2 lane road. The only thing I worry about is the not-so-adept teenage drivers driving to school while I'm trying to negotiate traffic and get into the left-hand turn lane.

BTW, I ride a >$2k bike to school now, my solution is to leave it in one of my teachers classroom. He rides to school as well and understands how much a good bike can cost so he's understanding enough to allow me to leave my bike in his classroom.
forum*rider is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 06:48 AM
  #40  
1.9lb/in
 
pseudobrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Susquehanna shoreline
Posts: 1,360

Bikes: LeMond, CAAD9/1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by phidauex
Ok, since it caused a bit of a flareup, let me rephrase!
Much clearer. What's likely to be more deadly in the future is this generation of fat, sedentary kids growing up and becoming an even larger bloc of fat, sedentary adults than we've ever seen before.
If you're a fat little kid, chances are not on your side that you'll grow up to be a trim, healthy adult.

I predict over 10% of the public will have had gastric bypass surgery in 30 years.

Asthma isn't 'lifestyle' related in the same way, since diet and exercise aren't as big of risk factors.
AFAIK, onset of asthma has nothing at all to do with diet and exercise. Triggers are typically environmental and hereditary.

(I'm very asthmatic)
pseudobrit is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 08:05 AM
  #41  
Geosynchronous Falconeer
 
recursive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 6,312

Bikes: 2006 Raleigh Rush Hour, Campy Habanero Team Ti, Soma Double Cross

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Does it "happen" more... I doubt it. It is my belief that there are a certain percentage of wierdos in the population, and those folks are the ones that don't quite fit the mold. However as population density increases, the chances that one may be exposed closer to home to one of these wierdos also then increases.

Unfortunatly as population density increases, so too does traffic in a particular area.

So generally I blame these woes on increasing population density.
This doesn't have an effect on the probability of being abducted. Sure, with higher population density the weirdo will be closer to more kids, but at the same time, there are more kids to choose from for the weirdo. So the probability for a kid "near" the weirdo will decrease. Overall, assuming we don't know where the weirdos are, an individual kid's probability is exactly the same.
__________________
Bring the pain.
recursive is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 09:25 AM
  #42  
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
I think we mostly agree that it would be good for kids and for cycling if more students rode to school. I have read the following concerns or problems and also list some possible solutions:
  1. Problem: Traffic safety. Possible solutions: Crossing guards and safety patrols, overpasses and other facilities, safety education.
  2. Problem: Predatory criminals. Possible solutions: Teach kids how to avoid (not necessarily fight off) this danger, travel to school in groups, crossing guards and safety patrols, better police patrols.
  3. Problem: Bicycle theft. Possible solutions: Racks for locking, theft prevention such as security cameras, education of parents and children.
  4. Problem: School is too far from home. Possible solution: None--except long term solutions of return to community schools and rollback of urban sprawl.
People are thinking that it is more dangerous for kids to ride (or walk) to school, but maybe the real problem is that we are no longer set up for it. When I was a kid in the 1960s, we had all the "possible solutions" that I listed above. As far as I know, millions of baby boom kids like myself made it to school just fine!
Roody is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 10:00 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
ajay677's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: For the record, I am not now, nor have I ever been, an idiot.
Posts: 500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by twahl
Yes, abduction. Watch the news, any news. Seems to happen daily. I wish it didn't, if it were my child I'd kill if I could, but none of that makes it non-existant.
It's our perception of the risk that has changed over the years. Even if it "seems to happen daily", that is 365 occurrences per year in a total population of 300 million plus, people. I'd suggest that your child's risk is far greater of being seriously injured or killed in a car crash on the way to school than of being abducted.
ajay677 is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 10:54 AM
  #44  
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by ajay677
It's our perception of the risk that has changed over the years. Even if it "seems to happen daily", that is 365 occurrences per year in a total population of 300 million plus, people. I'd suggest that your child's risk is far greater of being seriously injured or killed in a car crash on the way to school than of being abducted.
Or dog bite, bee sting, lightning, etc.

Nevertheless, there is a real risk, and parents get paid the big bucks to think about things like this. They rightly worry more about a low probability risk with severe consequences, than a higher probability risk with lesser consequences. There are few consequences more horrifying than a child abducted by a sexual predator! I think the real answer is to teach kids to stay safer. Travel in groups, come straight home from school, stay away from all strangers, etc. These guidelines work well, and they are taught in schools and homes. Each parent knows if their own child is willing and able to follow the guidelines.
Roody is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 11:31 AM
  #45  
Alien lifeform
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 263

Bikes: 2002 Specialized Expedition Elite, 2005 Jamis Aurora

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
One solution to many of these issues... ride with the kids to school. My oldest starts kindergarten in the fall. The road to school is too dangerous for kids to ride on their own (they need to cross a 4-lane high-traffic arterial road). I have a Burley Piccolo trailer bike on order for the specific purpose of riding my son to school. If the road had been safer he would certainly be capable of riding himself.

I'll send him on the bus if the weather is too bad for riding (does not happen often around here). What I will NOT do is drive him.
samundsen is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 11:57 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
closetbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
That's what I did. Rode with them the mile to school. How long does that take? Keeps them safe and you get to teach them how to ride (that translates nicely when they're ready to learn to drive) and you can get an idea what they look like when riding on their own (if you keep your distance and stay quiet on occasion).

People die and are severly injured every day in cars, yet parents often feel this is far safer than risk the rare chance of a random, stangers' abduction. Driving everywhere gets the kids in that frame of mind and leads to poor health down the line. A far greater risk.
closetbiker is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 12:18 PM
  #47  
Tom (ex)Builder
 
twahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 2,814

Bikes: Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ajay677
It's our perception of the risk that has changed over the years. Even if it "seems to happen daily", that is 365 occurrences per year in a total population of 300 million plus, people. I'd suggest that your child's risk is far greater of being seriously injured or killed in a car crash on the way to school than of being abducted.
That seems low, but again...the original poster misquoted the statistics in the article. that was 365 occurances of a non-family related abduction in the state of California over a 5 year period. Not the entire US, just one state. The national numbers are far more frightening and not nearly as reported as everyone seems to think. We get a couple a week on the national news, but with 58,000 occurances in one year, that's more than 150 per day! You want to dismiss that as inconsequential? You minimize the fear that parents may have, knowing that there will be 150 kids abducted by a non-family member that day? That's insane.
__________________
Tom

"It hurts so good..."
twahl is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 12:26 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Excessive risk-aversion. Or, in more direct terms, being wussies.
H_Roark is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 01:05 PM
  #49  
Tom (ex)Builder
 
twahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 2,814

Bikes: Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by H_Roark
Excessive risk-aversion. Or, in more direct terms, being wussies.
Got kids?
__________________
Tom

"It hurts so good..."
twahl is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 02:36 PM
  #50  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by recursive
This doesn't have an effect on the probability of being abducted. Sure, with higher population density the weirdo will be closer to more kids, but at the same time, there are more kids to choose from for the weirdo. So the probability for a kid "near" the weirdo will decrease. Overall, assuming we don't know where the weirdos are, an individual kid's probability is exactly the same.
Your probabilities almost worked, except for the fact that families are having fewer children these days, therefore there are more weirdoes per square area, per child than there were in the past, when there were less people per square area and more children per couple.

I know one thing that really freaked me out vis-à-vis "weirdoes" was when my local city put the sex offenders in a database that allowed you to see the approximate location of them (not actual addresses, but density in an area). That was not a pretty sight. I imagine that in a less densely populated area, the dots that represent the weirdoes would be much further apart.
genec is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.