Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Down With 'Avid Cyclists'

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Down With 'Avid Cyclists'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-10 | 08:45 PM
  #51  
AlmostTrick's Avatar
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,393
Likes: 945
From: Looney Tunes, IL

Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!

Can I be an Avid Cyclist when I grow up Mom?

AlmostTrick is offline  
Old 03-29-10 | 09:03 PM
  #52  
randya's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,696
Likes: 1
From: in bed with your mom

Bikes: who cares?

Originally Posted by GriddleCakes
The writer of the article in the OP is assuming that the media and society tag all cyclists as avid.
wrong, the writer is assuming that 'avid' is a designation cyclists use to describe themselves
randya is offline  
Old 03-29-10 | 09:22 PM
  #53  
noisebeam's Avatar
Arizona Dessert
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 2,170
From: AZ

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex

I've never called my self an avid anything, nor I have I heard any person I've cycled with use it to describe their cycling. The only time I've heard the term 'avid' to describe one's biking was in this exchange I had with a motorist who honked at me and closed passed me several times in the same location on the way to work:

me: excuse me.
mot: yes
me: did you know you almost hit me coming down rural road?
mot: no i did not
me: i am positive because you honked at me before you passed me
mot: only cause I don't wanna to hit you
me: you should move over to the other lane
mot: should you be in the middle like a car?
me: yes I should because I shouldn't be in the right turn lane, because I'm not turning right
mot: its, that's not a right turn lane
me: yes it is
mot: its all
me: no it isn't, i ride down there every day
mot: well you shouldn't be in the middle of the road 'cause you will get hit
me: no I won't, your the only person, you've done this to me three times
mot: no you, i have not
me: yes you have
mot: that's the first time I've ever seen you on a bike in the middle of the road
me: tell ya what I'm gonna call the police because you passed me closer than three feet, I've a video camera here so I have evidence of it
mot: i don't care about your video camera
me: i know you don't but it's some, you've got to look out for people, you know
mot: i do look out for people
me: no you don't
mot: i certainly don't want to hit a biker and have that on my conscious
me: then why don't you move over, there was no other cars
mot: you know i am an avid bike rider I know how to ride a bike
me: i...
mot: obviously you think you are an automobile and belong in the middle of the lane
me: no, i ride in the safest position on the road
mot: you ride like you own the road
me: no, you, come on you had a whole left lane open to you
mot: well i'm turning right, i don't need the left lane
me: then you can go around me you can easily done that
mot: I did go around you, you don't think i went around you
me: no you went right in the same lane as I was
mot: i'm in my lane
me: then move over to the other lane
mot: why?
me: because it is the proper thing do to you give people three feet clearance, it's state law, you pass a cyclist with three foot clearance
mot: if you've got a bike lane,
me: no i do not,
mot: and i miss you..
me: not on that road i do not
mot: you do up until this point [gestures to areas where close pass occurred] and..
me: right in which case...
mot: then there's stripe-ed, there striped lines
me: in which case I do not ride in the right turn lane
mot: come on
me: please look out for people
mot: i do look out, i've been driving for 53 years
me: well maybe you could take a refresher course
mot: and i think you should too
noisebeam is offline  
Old 03-29-10 | 10:55 PM
  #54  
Bekologist's Avatar
totally louche
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18,023
Likes: 12
From: A land that time forgot

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

An avid character shouldn't be required equipment for a bike ride across town!

I agree with steve that urban design can influence the rideability of a cityscape. I disagree with steve that prices of motoring have to go up considerably before ridership in american cities increases significantly. 30 percent of my states population does not drive as an example, but why is ridership so low?

US Cities could easily triple ridership thru tweaks in transportation infrastructure and other interventions that support populist roadway bicycling without any additional disincentives to car ownership or usage.



Make roads in towns and cities more amenable to bicycling for everyone 8 to 80. less avid, more everyday. less yellowjackets churning out 17mph on bedazzled and reflectorized urban commuter machines, more seniors on upright bikes riding for health to bingo, the senior center, the farmers market.

Thinking of bike amenable improvements to transportation infrastructure as providing 'passing facilities' so cars can more easily pass bicyclists is a continuance of the dated, autocentric paradigm that has left road cycling in america the field of the lofty 'avid' and less of the 'everyday' citizen simply getting on a bike and riding to the store, to visit friends, to go to work.

Last edited by Bekologist; 03-29-10 at 11:40 PM.
Bekologist is offline  
Old 03-29-10 | 11:32 PM
  #55  
cudak888's Avatar
www.theheadbadge.com
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29,020
Likes: 5,526
From: Southern Florida

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Originally Posted by noisebeam
me: excuse me.
mot: yes
me: did you know you almost hit me coming down rural road?
mot: no i did not
both of you: yakkatayakkatayakkatayakkatayakkatayakkatayakkatayakkatayakkatayakkatayakkatayakkata.............
"AW SHUT UP!"

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 03-29-10 | 11:39 PM
  #56  
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 4
From: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Originally Posted by cudak888
'Uncomfortable and temperamental' is a $65 Wally World bicycle-shaped-object.

-Kurt
I agree, the LBS I go to won't even work on them.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 03-30-10 | 12:59 AM
  #57  
GriddleCakes's Avatar
Tawp Dawg
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage, AK

Bikes: '06 Surly Pugsley, '14 Surly Straggler, '88 Kuwahara Xtracycle, '10 Motobecane Outcast 29er, '?? Surly Cross Check (wife's), '00 Trek 4500 (wife's), '12 Windsor Oxford 3-speed (dogs')

Originally Posted by randya
wrong, the writer is assuming that 'avid' is a designation cyclists use to describe themselves
Originally Posted by Michael Druker
Make a mental count of how often you’ve seen news reports or commentary refer to “avid cyclists”, and the number of times you might have used this term yourself....In other words, labelling those who willingly cycle as “avid cyclists” is a way of setting aside the difficult and interesting problem of how to make our cities conducive to cycling — in favor of the easy story of cycling as something “other”, as something done by people who aren’t normal.[/url]
He says both. But he is incorrect that the media uses the term "avid cyclist" more than just "cyclist". And, amongst the commuters and utility cyclists that I know, nobody uses the term "avid cyclist". I don't hang out with recreational cyclists, and I won't pretend to know what the majority of cyclists refer themselves as.

Originally Posted by Michael Druker
I claim that in most North American cities, while you will find many people riding a bicycle for utility/transportation, most people who cycle are hardly avid.
And here he is correct, except that he assumes that most of these people are being identified as "avid cyclists". His argument that the term "avid cyclist" is harmful to bicycle infrastructure hinges upon the fact that society views everyone on a bike as avid, thereby alienating cycling from the general populace. But I don't think that society views every biker as such, and I'm pretty sure that Mr. Druker is making an issue out of nothing. Who cares if people self identify as avid cyclists? If someone is dedicated to a sport, then they are, by the definition of the word, avid.

This thread is the antithesis of the "What defines a cyclist?" thread. Except that they're both fairly pointless.
GriddleCakes is offline  
Old 03-30-10 | 01:16 AM
  #58  
cyclezealot's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,237
Likes: 75
From: Fallbrook,Calif./Palau del Vidre, France

Bikes: Klein QP, Fuji touring, Surly Cross Check, BCH City bike

Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy
I agree, the LBS I go to won't even work on them.
Would not one think a shop might have a problem with the fact, replacement parts are worth more than the bike when new.?
__________________
Pray for the Dead and Fight like Hell for the Living










^ Since January 1, 2012
cyclezealot is offline  
Old 03-30-10 | 01:18 AM
  #59  
Randomhead
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,930
Likes: 4,825
From: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
I'm just riding my bike, sometimes to work, sometimes for exercise and enjoyment. I see no reason for a cyclist to disparage another cyclist. And that goes all the way from the guy riding because he got a dui all the way up to the top pro racers and everyone in between.

I couldn't disagree if someone called me an avid cyclist, I doubt anyone would though.

Last edited by unterhausen; 03-30-10 at 01:24 AM.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 03-30-10 | 01:24 AM
  #60  
cyclezealot's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,237
Likes: 75
From: Fallbrook,Calif./Palau del Vidre, France

Bikes: Klein QP, Fuji touring, Surly Cross Check, BCH City bike

Originally Posted by genec
You took it wrong... those colorful cyclists (and I am one from time to time) tend to define the public's view of cycling, yet in reality represent a small portion of cycling overall. There are really more utility (read: sidewalk) cyclists out there daily going from A to B, but these cyclists are viewed as "poor," "alcoholic," "student" or "damaged" in some way.

Trying to normalize cycling as something any and all of us citizens can do is difficult, due to the colorful, vocal few.

Personally I fit all the categories from time to time... colorful club cyclist, fred, even poor looking "damaged" cyclist, and more... all depending on which bike and what I happen to be wearing at the moment. I really am an avid cyclist, but I defy definition. (and I am amazed at the reactions that I as a "person on a bike" get depending on the public role I happen to fit at any moment.)

Being a truly avid cyclist, I also see the advantages for encouraging cycling by nearly any and all cycling facilities... especially in our very very motorist centric society.
Seems to me you see plenty of 'uncolorful' utility cyclists about town all the time.. So, I sort of disagree with the premise of the discussion.. My problem with utility cycling, the addiction.. I think I am just going to go about town for errands. But, I end up 25 miles away because I'd prefer to go to store X and it's too nice a day to not do the 25 miles.... Without the colorful clothes , i find my ass hurts too much.. My solution, when I enter the store far away, I put on knee length nylon shorts and who knows the difference..
__________________
Pray for the Dead and Fight like Hell for the Living










^ Since January 1, 2012
cyclezealot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ajhsmith
United Kingdom
2
02-24-14 02:04 PM
Roody
Living Car Free
37
05-25-13 05:18 AM
work4bike
Europe
17
07-30-12 08:47 AM
1nterceptor
Advocacy & Safety
249
10-27-11 06:32 PM
danarnold
Vehicular Cycling (VC)
176
01-07-10 01:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.