Rules of the Road -Sidwalk version
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Eating oranges of course!
Bikes: Sun Miami Trike - 2007
Rules of the Road -Sidwalk version
I ride my trike on the sidewalk. Strangely enough this is ok in my neck of the woods in Florida. Infact, most cyclists use the sidewalk rather than the street simply because the roadways barely have room for cars. There are no bike lanes.
Whatever the case, I was riding my trike and approached an intersection where a crossing guard was stationed. For some reason the trike just screams "challenged cyclist" so the guard kindly advised me that I could go across. I was about to anyway but he also advised me that I "should be walking my trike across the crosswalk".
Is that so? I can't find anything, off hand, in the Florida driving regs..
Another question. I know this one is basic but bear with me. What is the order of traffic at a "signaled" intersection as it relates to pedestrians. BTW, a cyclist using the sidewalk is termed a pedestrian in this case.
If I have the light, should I still wait for all the cars, who are turning, to turn before I walk with my bike? Or, because the pedestrian light is on, am I initially expected to go first before the cars turning do?
I don't drive so this is a bit of a mystery to me. Also, when I lived in NYC, I used the herding approach to crossing the street. Mainly, when everyone left the curb, so did I. Safety in numbers I guess.
In these Florida streets, where mostly everyone drives, I'm the lost sheep in over sized sunglasses waiting at the curb.
Some drivers wave me on, before they make their right turn, others make their turn even though I've stepped off the curb.
Whatever the case, I was riding my trike and approached an intersection where a crossing guard was stationed. For some reason the trike just screams "challenged cyclist" so the guard kindly advised me that I could go across. I was about to anyway but he also advised me that I "should be walking my trike across the crosswalk".
Is that so? I can't find anything, off hand, in the Florida driving regs..
Another question. I know this one is basic but bear with me. What is the order of traffic at a "signaled" intersection as it relates to pedestrians. BTW, a cyclist using the sidewalk is termed a pedestrian in this case.
If I have the light, should I still wait for all the cars, who are turning, to turn before I walk with my bike? Or, because the pedestrian light is on, am I initially expected to go first before the cars turning do?
I don't drive so this is a bit of a mystery to me. Also, when I lived in NYC, I used the herding approach to crossing the street. Mainly, when everyone left the curb, so did I. Safety in numbers I guess.
In these Florida streets, where mostly everyone drives, I'm the lost sheep in over sized sunglasses waiting at the curb.
Some drivers wave me on, before they make their right turn, others make their turn even though I've stepped off the curb.
Last edited by SunnyFlorida; 05-01-10 at 10:00 PM.
#2
Banned
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 3
Two things here....
Thing one -- this is a friggin' crossing guard! Don't for one second think they've done more to learn traffic laws or rules of the road than read some silly pamphlet or talk to the retiree they're replacing. Go to the source; read the city and state codes as they pertain to traffic. It (the answer) will be there.
As far as intersection right-of-way, peds are supposed to have priority -- but we all know how that goes. Some ignorant coffin-roller will TAKE what they feel and decide is THEIR right, so take it as it comes. Someone jumps the crosswalk, don't be there. A second or a bit less sometimes can be the difference in communication, IF the driver is aware and at all concerned about you.
BTW -- safety in numbers is rule 1 for street survival -- unless you're in a peloton in Texas in front of a drunken immigrant....
Thing one -- this is a friggin' crossing guard! Don't for one second think they've done more to learn traffic laws or rules of the road than read some silly pamphlet or talk to the retiree they're replacing. Go to the source; read the city and state codes as they pertain to traffic. It (the answer) will be there.
As far as intersection right-of-way, peds are supposed to have priority -- but we all know how that goes. Some ignorant coffin-roller will TAKE what they feel and decide is THEIR right, so take it as it comes. Someone jumps the crosswalk, don't be there. A second or a bit less sometimes can be the difference in communication, IF the driver is aware and at all concerned about you.
BTW -- safety in numbers is rule 1 for street survival -- unless you're in a peloton in Texas in front of a drunken immigrant....
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Reno, NV
Two things here....
Thing one -- this is a friggin' crossing guard! Don't for one second think they've done more to learn traffic laws or rules of the road than read some silly pamphlet or talk to the retiree they're replacing. Go to the source; read the city and state codes as they pertain to traffic. It (the answer) will be there.
As far as intersection right-of-way, peds are supposed to have priority -- but we all know how that goes. Some ignorant coffin-roller will TAKE what they feel and decide is THEIR right, so take it as it comes. Someone jumps the crosswalk, don't be there. A second or a bit less sometimes can be the difference in communication, IF the driver is aware and at all concerned about you.
BTW -- safety in numbers is rule 1 for street survival -- unless you're in a peloton in Texas in front of a drunken immigrant....
Thing one -- this is a friggin' crossing guard! Don't for one second think they've done more to learn traffic laws or rules of the road than read some silly pamphlet or talk to the retiree they're replacing. Go to the source; read the city and state codes as they pertain to traffic. It (the answer) will be there.
As far as intersection right-of-way, peds are supposed to have priority -- but we all know how that goes. Some ignorant coffin-roller will TAKE what they feel and decide is THEIR right, so take it as it comes. Someone jumps the crosswalk, don't be there. A second or a bit less sometimes can be the difference in communication, IF the driver is aware and at all concerned about you.
BTW -- safety in numbers is rule 1 for street survival -- unless you're in a peloton in Texas in front of a drunken immigrant....
#4
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 590
Likes: 1
From: Beverly Hills, MI
Bikes: '72 Fuji Finest, '80 Austro-Daimler Inter 10, '06 Fuji Team Issue, '06 Salsa Las Cruces, Nashbar Frame single speed
IIRC, I believe that you ARE supposed to walk your bike when using a crosswalk, not that I've ever heard of anyone being ticketed for riding across. And just out of curiosity, when you say "most cyclists," are those cyclist predominantly riding mountain/hybrid/comfort bikes? Or are you including lycra-wearing drop-bar riding roadies like me in the mix?
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
From: Central CA
Bikes: A little of everything
Punching 'florida cycling law sidewalk' into google....
Doesn't say you need to dismount, and the second-to-last paragraph seems to indicate that staying mounted is correct. Personally, for safety, I'd strongly consider dismounting, but I've never been on a FL road, either.
(Section 316.2065(10) and (11), F.S.)
A person propelling a vehicle by human power upon and along a sidewalk, or across a roadway upon and along a crosswalk, has all the rights and duties applicable to a pedestrian under the same circumstances.
Comment: Sidewalks are not designed for bicycle speeds, but a bicycle propelled by human power may be used except where prohibited by local ordinance (e.g. in the central business districts of many cities). No bicycle may be propelled by other than human power on a sidewalk. Although a cyclist riding on a sidewalk has the rights and duties of a pedestrian, he is still a "bicycle rider" and his bicycle is still a "bicycle". Consequently, laws that pertain to required equipment and to carriage of passengers (see above) are still applicable.
Since a cyclist riding on a sidewalk does not have the duties (or rights) of a driver, he may ride in either direction. (However, it is safer to ride in the direction of traffic, since drivers do not expect cyclists to come from the other direction at driveways and crosswalks. Crash risk is 3 to 4 times as great for sidewalk riders who ride facing roadway traffic as for sidewalk riders who ride in the direction of traffic.)
At a signalized intersection, a sidewalk rider must obey the instructions of any applicable pedestrian control signal. That is, he may start to cross a roadway in a crosswalk only during a steady Walk phase, if one is displayed. If no pedestrian signal is provided, the cyclist may proceed in accordance with the signal indications for the parallel roadway traffic flow (Section 316.075, F.S.).
A person propelling a bicycle upon and along a sidewalk, or across a roadway upon and along a crosswalk, shall yield the right-of-way to any pedestrian and shall give an audible signal before overtaking and passing such pedestrian.
A person propelling a vehicle by human power upon and along a sidewalk, or across a roadway upon and along a crosswalk, has all the rights and duties applicable to a pedestrian under the same circumstances.Comment: Sidewalks are not designed for bicycle speeds, but a bicycle propelled by human power may be used except where prohibited by local ordinance (e.g. in the central business districts of many cities). No bicycle may be propelled by other than human power on a sidewalk. Although a cyclist riding on a sidewalk has the rights and duties of a pedestrian, he is still a "bicycle rider" and his bicycle is still a "bicycle". Consequently, laws that pertain to required equipment and to carriage of passengers (see above) are still applicable.
Since a cyclist riding on a sidewalk does not have the duties (or rights) of a driver, he may ride in either direction. (However, it is safer to ride in the direction of traffic, since drivers do not expect cyclists to come from the other direction at driveways and crosswalks. Crash risk is 3 to 4 times as great for sidewalk riders who ride facing roadway traffic as for sidewalk riders who ride in the direction of traffic.)
At a signalized intersection, a sidewalk rider must obey the instructions of any applicable pedestrian control signal. That is, he may start to cross a roadway in a crosswalk only during a steady Walk phase, if one is displayed. If no pedestrian signal is provided, the cyclist may proceed in accordance with the signal indications for the parallel roadway traffic flow (Section 316.075, F.S.).
A person propelling a bicycle upon and along a sidewalk, or across a roadway upon and along a crosswalk, shall yield the right-of-way to any pedestrian and shall give an audible signal before overtaking and passing such pedestrian.
Last edited by Raiden; 05-01-10 at 10:23 PM.
#6
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Eating oranges of course!
Bikes: Sun Miami Trike - 2007
IIRC, I believe that you ARE supposed to walk your bike when using a crosswalk, not that I've ever heard of anyone being ticketed for riding across. And just out of curiosity, when you say "most cyclists," are those cyclist predominantly riding mountain/hybrid/comfort bikes? Or are you including lycra-wearing drop-bar riding roadies like me in the mix?
#7
As you may know, Florida Statutes are available online (this is true for most states).
According to Florida law, a bicyclist riding on the sidewalk or riding in a crosswalk has all the rights and responsibilities of a pedestrian (perhaps not true in all states but true in Florida). Florida law is fairly clear that it is legal to ride a bicycle in a crosswalk (the laws in many states are considerably less clear on this).
As far as right of way goes, if you have the light, you, as a pedestrian in or about to enter a crosswalk, have the right of way. This is true in all 50 states but many motorist do not seem to get it. Motorists should yield and let a pedestrian that has the light go first. But some motorists don't. So exercise caution when claiming your right of way. Being right is not worth getting hit.
Where bicyclists acting as pedestrians are most likely to screw up is in entering the roadway. A pedestrian is prohibited by law from entering the roadway suddenly.
According to Florida law, a bicyclist riding on the sidewalk or riding in a crosswalk has all the rights and responsibilities of a pedestrian (perhaps not true in all states but true in Florida). Florida law is fairly clear that it is legal to ride a bicycle in a crosswalk (the laws in many states are considerably less clear on this).
As far as right of way goes, if you have the light, you, as a pedestrian in or about to enter a crosswalk, have the right of way. This is true in all 50 states but many motorist do not seem to get it. Motorists should yield and let a pedestrian that has the light go first. But some motorists don't. So exercise caution when claiming your right of way. Being right is not worth getting hit.
Where bicyclists acting as pedestrians are most likely to screw up is in entering the roadway. A pedestrian is prohibited by law from entering the roadway suddenly.
#8
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Bikes: litespeed, cannondale
As you may know, Florida Statutes are available online (this is true for most states).
According to Florida law, a bicyclist riding on the sidewalk or riding in a crosswalk has all the rights and responsibilities of a pedestrian (perhaps not true in all states but true in Florida). Florida law is fairly clear that it is legal to ride a bicycle in a crosswalk (the laws in many states are considerably less clear on this).
As far as right of way goes, if you have the light, you, as a pedestrian in or about to enter a crosswalk, have the right of way. This is true in all 50 states but many motorist do not seem to get it. Motorists should yield and let a pedestrian that has the light go first. But some motorists don't. So exercise caution when claiming your right of way. Being right is not worth getting hit.
Where bicyclists acting as pedestrians are most likely to screw up is in entering the roadway. A pedestrian is prohibited by law from entering the roadway suddenly.
According to Florida law, a bicyclist riding on the sidewalk or riding in a crosswalk has all the rights and responsibilities of a pedestrian (perhaps not true in all states but true in Florida). Florida law is fairly clear that it is legal to ride a bicycle in a crosswalk (the laws in many states are considerably less clear on this).
As far as right of way goes, if you have the light, you, as a pedestrian in or about to enter a crosswalk, have the right of way. This is true in all 50 states but many motorist do not seem to get it. Motorists should yield and let a pedestrian that has the light go first. But some motorists don't. So exercise caution when claiming your right of way. Being right is not worth getting hit.
Where bicyclists acting as pedestrians are most likely to screw up is in entering the roadway. A pedestrian is prohibited by law from entering the roadway suddenly.
Also, motorists are supposed to yield to pedestrians crossing at the light. However, by practice many FL motorists just go and pedestrians can take their chances. As a predictable consequence, Florida has hideously high pedestrian fatality rates.
#9
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Eating oranges of course!
Bikes: Sun Miami Trike - 2007
Thanks for all the responses. It has definitely cleared up some matters for me.
DX-Man - You're right. No matter what is suppose to happen, you still have to keep a sharp look out.
rwp - Yep. There is a little anger in DX-Man's reply but after cycling for two weeks, I can well understand why. I've observed a lot of selfish acts by some motorists as well as by cyclists that could have easily caused injury.
dperreno- At this point whether or not the crossing guard is right, I'm walking my trike across the crosswalk. Of course, this good intention will be dropped like a bad habit, if I'm half way across and see I have 6 seconds to make it to the other side.
Raiden - I agree that even if I don't have to dismount, under the circumstances, it is safer me to do so, until I gain more experience. I have found that when I do this and cross when the pedestrian light is on, I don't have cars jumping the gun on me to turn before I reach the other side of the crosswalk. I'm wondering if pressing the pedestrian button on the mast pole delays the signal the cars see to allow the pedestrian to cross the street safely.
JRA/Pat - Thanks for looking up and clarifying the Florida regs on this. It definitely clears up what "should" be happening at the traffic signal. I also noted that "failure to yield" part too.
DX-Man - You're right. No matter what is suppose to happen, you still have to keep a sharp look out.
rwp - Yep. There is a little anger in DX-Man's reply but after cycling for two weeks, I can well understand why. I've observed a lot of selfish acts by some motorists as well as by cyclists that could have easily caused injury.
dperreno- At this point whether or not the crossing guard is right, I'm walking my trike across the crosswalk. Of course, this good intention will be dropped like a bad habit, if I'm half way across and see I have 6 seconds to make it to the other side.
Raiden - I agree that even if I don't have to dismount, under the circumstances, it is safer me to do so, until I gain more experience. I have found that when I do this and cross when the pedestrian light is on, I don't have cars jumping the gun on me to turn before I reach the other side of the crosswalk. I'm wondering if pressing the pedestrian button on the mast pole delays the signal the cars see to allow the pedestrian to cross the street safely.
JRA/Pat - Thanks for looking up and clarifying the Florida regs on this. It definitely clears up what "should" be happening at the traffic signal. I also noted that "failure to yield" part too.
#10
Even when motorists are supposed to yield, many don't.
Last edited by JRA; 05-02-10 at 07:41 PM.
#11
meandering nomad

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 457
Likes: 24
From: Newport,Rhode Island
Bikes: eleven bikes no car
I see every type of cyclist which includes lycra-wearing drop-bar riding roadies like you. Infact, it seems that the only ones braving the street are cyclists who clearly have a death wish. They usually have no helmet, ride around in open shirts in the hot Florida sun on rusty looking bikes.
Provided of course if they wiish to be considered cyclists and not peds, and who want to go faster than walking speed.
Maybe these fellows like myself have been riding bikes all their lives and realize that a plastic hat is not that important and that being aware and skilled is safe, just like the millions all over the world that do the same.
I also have never had a drivers license, and I don't have a death wish, I've been on bikes since 1963 and I am not dead.
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
When I'm walking on streets in florida that don't get much ped traffic, I give the death stare to right turning traffic. It works very well. That includes cars at intersections, as well as cars that are going to be turning across the sidewalk into a driveway. If you don't get an acnoledgement of the death stare, don't expect them to yield. Driveways are a lot worse then intersections.
#13
www.theheadbadge.com



Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29,026
Likes: 5,538
From: Southern Florida
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Oh my, a novice with a tricycle riding on the sidewalk making judgemental assumptions about people who are where they should be.
Provided of course if they wiish to be considered cyclists and not peds, and who want to go faster than walking speed.
Maybe these fellows like myself have been riding bikes all their lives and realize that a plastic hat is not that important and that being aware and skilled is safe, just like the millions all over the world that do the same.
I also have never had a drivers license, and I don't have a death wish, I've been on bikes since 1963 and I am not dead.
Provided of course if they wiish to be considered cyclists and not peds, and who want to go faster than walking speed.
Maybe these fellows like myself have been riding bikes all their lives and realize that a plastic hat is not that important and that being aware and skilled is safe, just like the millions all over the world that do the same.
I also have never had a drivers license, and I don't have a death wish, I've been on bikes since 1963 and I am not dead.
-Kurt
#14
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Eating oranges of course!
Bikes: Sun Miami Trike - 2007
When I'm walking on streets in florida that don't get much ped traffic, I give the death stare to right turning traffic. It works very well. That includes cars at intersections, as well as cars that are going to be turning across the sidewalk into a driveway. If you don't get an acnoledgement of the death stare, don't expect them to yield. Driveways are a lot worse then intersections.
Oh my feelings are so hurt.

Hey, I just want to get to point A to B in one piece. FOR ME this means being on the sidewalk and it seems like I've got plenty of company.
As far as POB's getting pleasure out of insulting the cycling community? I personally wouldn't know since I've been too busy commuting on my trike.
#15
#16
Conservative Hippie
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 0
From: Wakulla Co. FL
He's a crossing guard going off old information that used to be taught to elementary age.
"You should walk your bike through the cross-walk."
"Oh? Thank you." As I pedal away.
No, there's nothing to require walking a bike through a cross-walk in Chapter 316.
When the walk signal goes green pedestrians, and you on your trike, have the right-of-way. But never expect a right turning motorist to be competent.
Personally, I wouldn't be on a sidewalk with a bike, unless the road was closed or I had a mechanical malfunction. The most unsafe place to ride.
"You should walk your bike through the cross-walk."
"Oh? Thank you." As I pedal away.
No, there's nothing to require walking a bike through a cross-walk in Chapter 316.
When the walk signal goes green pedestrians, and you on your trike, have the right-of-way. But never expect a right turning motorist to be competent.
Personally, I wouldn't be on a sidewalk with a bike, unless the road was closed or I had a mechanical malfunction. The most unsafe place to ride.
Last edited by CommuterRun; 05-07-10 at 06:47 PM.
#18
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Eating oranges of course!
Bikes: Sun Miami Trike - 2007
Seattle Forrest and CommuterRun,
Thanks for the feedback.
Seattle Forrest - I can well imagine the hazzards of a urban sidewalk. Here, in this suburb, the sidewalks are almost devoid of pedestrian traffic, unlike car traffic. I'm also going so slow right now that I can easily determine the "in and out" traffic of private driveways, especially those of apartment complexes.
And although I'm mainly using the sidewalk, I'm also riding "on the streets" of side streets to avoid major construction, etc.
CommuterRun - Thanks for stating the actual chapter.
Well, at least there is one good rule you learn as a kid that doesn't change with age - "look both ways before you cross."
Thanks for the feedback.
Seattle Forrest - I can well imagine the hazzards of a urban sidewalk. Here, in this suburb, the sidewalks are almost devoid of pedestrian traffic, unlike car traffic. I'm also going so slow right now that I can easily determine the "in and out" traffic of private driveways, especially those of apartment complexes.
And although I'm mainly using the sidewalk, I'm also riding "on the streets" of side streets to avoid major construction, etc.
CommuterRun - Thanks for stating the actual chapter.
Well, at least there is one good rule you learn as a kid that doesn't change with age - "look both ways before you cross."
#19
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Bikes: late 80's bianchi campion d'italia, early 90's trek 2100, early 90's shogun selectra, mid 90's aluminum marin xcMTB, dept. store grade but upgraded columbia double eagle tandem
I am by no means a "sidewalk cyclist", but when I am doubling bikes, as in riding one while holding onto another to get it from A to B quickly for whatever reason, I will ride on the sidewalk on busier streets. Does this mean I'm evil? For me I feel the risk of a self inflicted fall in traffic while doing this far outweighs any of the more modest risks of careful and alert low speed sidewalk riding, even though the dangers of sidewalk riding are somewhat bigger while doing so. being double wide on the sidewalk gives lots of opportunity for for catching parts on poles, bushes etc.
#20
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: ѺϡϟᐝᓿᕔᙰᔒѪᓁҸѨҨ
Bikes: Kuwahara Aries
I'm a fellow Florida Sidewalk Rider, although in my case more because I live right between most of the Orlando colleges and have ~6 foot wide sidewalks for most of my routes. Most likely not an accident since the current official plan is to try and shift 90% of all bicycle traffic onto dedicated facilities for every 10% of painted-only lanes.
I've found the most effective method is to walk the bike out just enough they can't turn right or pretend not to see you then quickly mount and ride the rest of the way across while giving the death glare to perpendicular traffic, it's a trick I picked up from UCF's bicycle officers. Sometimes the "HALT" hand can work too, but with the potholes around here I prefer having both hands on the bars.
In these Florida streets, where mostly everyone drives, I'm the lost sheep in over sized sunglasses waiting at the curb.
#21
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Eating oranges of course!
Bikes: Sun Miami Trike - 2007
I am by no means a "sidewalk cyclist", but when I am doubling bikes, as in riding one while holding onto another to get it from A to B quickly for whatever reason, I will ride on the sidewalk on busier streets. Does this mean I'm evil? For me I feel the risk of a self inflicted fall in traffic while doing this far outweighs any of the more modest risks of careful and alert low speed sidewalk riding, even though the dangers of sidewalk riding are somewhat bigger while doing so. being double wide on the sidewalk gives lots of opportunity for for catching parts on poles, bushes etc.
I live near a university with a huge campus. I've also found that the local narrow sidwalks will suddenly give way to 6 foot wide ones. I encounter the most cyclists on these sidewalks surrounding the campus. Once I clear the campus, I'm back to mainly deserted sidewalks.
#23
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Eating oranges of course!
Bikes: Sun Miami Trike - 2007
Oh here we go again! If I'm on a bike I belong on the road. If I'm not on the road I shouldn't be riding never mind having a bike --- right? Don't be such a bike Nazi.
#24
genec
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 27,072
Likes: 4,533
From: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
While sidewalks may "statistically" be more dangerous, the statistics used generally do not discriminate by age, and thus scraped knees and ride-outs by children are a large part of these danger statistics. Such is also the case of MUPs.
The bottom line is that not all wheeled conveyances belong on the street.
#25
Senior Member


Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 15,336
Likes: 1,789
From: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Florida traffic law does not recognize a "right of way". They have "failure to yield". It seems like a small distinction. But even if they other guy is supposed to yield to you, you have an obligation to avoid an accident with a bozo who fails to yield if it is possible. In Florida law, no one has the "right" to run into someone else.
In a sense, one doesn't "take" the so-called "right of way", one is "given" it. If it isn't being given (ie, a failure to yeild), then there exists a requirement (legal or commonsense) to try avoid a conflict (ie, collision). The idea is cooperation coordinated/guided by standard rules (the traffic rules).
The result (ideally) is a two level safety system: 1) regular rules of behavior/interaction and caution/responsibility when those rules happen to fail.
Last edited by njkayaker; 05-13-10 at 09:35 AM.






