Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Bicyclist warned about night riding, then killed a little bit later by a car

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Bicyclist warned about night riding, then killed a little bit later by a car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-10, 12:25 PM
  #76  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
my gawd, we are what makes A&S, A&S, ain't we?
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 08-06-10, 12:28 PM
  #77  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy
Speaking of drunk drivers wasn't part of that discretion also that if there was a sober and licensed driver in the car to allow said sober and licensed driver to drive the car home?
If one was present...otherwise we might just have them park it and give them a ride home or call someone to come drive home for them.
These days if you are just caught parked, trying to sleep it off, you're gonna go to jail.

"To protect and serve" used to mean something...even if today "to arrest and prosecute" is more accurate.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 08-06-10, 12:29 PM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times in 945 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
So popularity is an indication of potential danger? I don't think so.
I'm not saying that.

Originally Posted by chipcom
I have, wouldn't you?
I don't think it's common. And, where I live, you'd spend all night providing transportation for ninja cyclists!

Originally Posted by chipcom
The car analogy does apply...would a warning suffice there?
It's a bit hard to push a car on a sidewalk.

Anyway, I don't think the analogy applies very well (and I explained why).

Note that there wasn't any sidewalk where the collision occurred. It's a bit odd too that he was going north to a place (Shell Point) that was south.

Bad place to be riding at night without lights.

https://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sour...169.36,,0,8.17

=================

If the officer has "discretion" in his actions, then that means there is a range of acceptable actions he's allowed to take. He doesn't have discretion to take an unacceptable action, obviously.

If the action he took is acceptable, he isn't negligent (ie, liable).

The question then is whether a warning to "keep off of the road" is an acceptable action or not.

Last edited by njkayaker; 08-06-10 at 12:36 PM.
njkayaker is offline  
Old 08-06-10, 12:35 PM
  #79  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by njkayaker
I'm not saying that.


I don't think it's common. And, where I live, you'd spend all night providing transportation for ninja cyclists!


It's a bit hard to push a car on a sidewalk.

Anyway, I don't think it applies very well (and I explained why).

Note that there wasn't any sidewalk where the accident occurred. It's a bit odd too that he was going north to a place (Shell Point) that was south.

=================

If the officer has "discretion" in his actions, then that means there is a range of acceptable actions he's allowed to take. He doesn't have discretion to take an unacceptable action, obviously.

If the action he took is acceptable, he isn't negligent (ie, liable).

The question then is whether a warning to "keep off of the road" is an acceptable action or not.
That is indeed the $64 question that will be asked if someone goes after him....was the action he took acceptable and reasonable. The answer is obviously debatable.

As far as giving people rides and such, yeah, it isn't as common anymore...because cops just don't have the discretion they used to have - partially due to situations like this where the city/department/officer got hammered by a lawsuit.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 08-06-10, 08:18 PM
  #80  
The Drive Side is Within
 
Standalone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Haven, CT, USA
Posts: 3,334

Bikes: Road, Cargo, Tandem, Etc.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 28 Posts
The worst thing about this thread is that someone dies, and if I'm really honest with myself about it, there is entertainment value to me in debating it online. I hope that I've at least been respectful.

Digital Cowboy-- the guy's name was Detron. In South Carolina. It's very likely an afr. amer. name. I teach in a majority black high school, and have nothing against names that are indicative of any particular race or ethnicity. Cops and law and race are intertwined. Just as much in my state as they are in the South, IMO.

Chipcom-- reductio ad absurdum is different than devil's advocate, I think. I'm actually honestly behind what I'm putting out here in this thread. I am glad cops are allowed to be and expected to be human, not ticket and summons writing automatons. When it comes to serious stuff--- felonies, serious misdemeanors-- cops need to play by the book. But infractions such as the one being discussed here must be within the realm of discretion.

Discretion does not necessarily lead to Judge Dredd...
__________________
The bicycle, the bicycle surely, should always be the vehicle of novelists and poets. Christopher Morley
Standalone is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 12:19 AM
  #81  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
If one was present...otherwise we might just have them park it and give them a ride home or call someone to come drive home for them.
These days if you are just caught parked, trying to sleep it off, you're gonna go to jail.

"To protect and serve" used to mean something...even if today "to arrest and prosecute" is more accurate.
Yep, sadly all one has to do is to read the articles and comments about car v. bike crashes to see that.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 12:34 AM
  #82  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Standalone
The worst thing about this thread is that someone dies, and if I'm really honest with myself about it, there is entertainment value to me in debating it online. I hope that I've at least been respectful.

Digital Cowboy-- the guy's name was Detron. In South Carolina. It's very likely an afr. amer. name. I teach in a majority black high school, and have nothing against names that are indicative of any particular race or ethnicity. Cops and law and race are intertwined. Just as much in my state as they are in the South, IMO.
I presume that you've seen some of the names that actors are giving their kids these days. Gwyneth Paltrow named one of her kids "Apple," one of Bruce Willis' kids is named "Rumor."

Originally Posted by Standalone
Chipcom-- reductio ad absurdum is different than devil's advocate, I think. I'm actually honestly behind what I'm putting out here in this thread. I am glad cops are allowed to be and expected to be human, not ticket and summons writing automatons. When it comes to serious stuff--- felonies, serious misdemeanors-- cops need to play by the book. But infractions such as the one being discussed here must be within the realm of discretion.

Discretion does not necessarily lead to Judge Dredd...
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 12:40 AM
  #83  
Senior Member
 
KD5NRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697

Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy
I presume that you've seen some of the names that actors are giving their kids these days. Gwyneth Paltrow named one of her kids "Apple," one of Bruce Willis' kids is named "Rumor."
"These days?" You do realize that Moon Unit Zappa is 42 now, right?

EDIT TO ADD: and Shanda Lear is in her 60s.

Last edited by KD5NRH; 08-07-10 at 12:43 AM.
KD5NRH is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 12:54 AM
  #84  
Bicikli Huszár
 
sudo bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116

Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
"To protect and serve" used to mean something...even if today "to arrest and prosecute" is more accurate.
Now that I agree with. And I think you're right that the reason we see this drop in reasonable discretion is because of the litigiousness of our society. It's the root of a lot of problems, IMO...
sudo bike is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 12:57 AM
  #85  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I dunno, seems to me my car has lights on it. They shine forwards, so anything I'm going to hit gets perfectly well illuminated regardless of reflectors and the like.

Pedestrians aren't required to have blinking lights, I've somehow avoided hitting one.

Just sayin.
Commodus is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 03:37 AM
  #86  
Senior Member
 
KD5NRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697

Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by sudo bike
Now that I agree with. And I think you're right that the reason we see this drop in reasonable discretion is because of the litigiousness of our society. It's the root of a lot of problems, IMO...
As has been said on another forum, they used to be "peace officers." When so many became "law enforcement officers" was when the problems really picked up.
KD5NRH is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 03:38 AM
  #87  
Senior Member
 
KD5NRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697

Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Commodus
Pedestrians aren't required to have blinking lights, I've somehow avoided hitting one.
You've only avoided one? Geez, how many have you hit?
KD5NRH is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 05:22 AM
  #88  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times in 829 Posts
It has been established legally that response organizations do not have a duty to respond (think LA Riots), only that if they do respond they respond appropriately. In this case the officer did not, in my opinion, have a duty to stop the cyclist. He did. Were his actions appropriate...were they consistent with his departmental policy, his training, his experience? In all liklihood yes. YOU, meaning everyone reading this, DO NOT WANT discretionary latitude taken away from officers. Would this keep someone from filing suit? No way. Would the cyclists family win the suit? Not very likely at all.


"The deputy reported having trouble seeing Jenkins and told him to stay out of the road before sending Jenkins on his way."

Had the subject simply followed the deputy's instructions, we wouldn't be having this discussion right now.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 06:07 AM
  #89  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by KD5NRH
You've only avoided one? Geez, how many have you hit?


No points for him!
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 06:10 AM
  #90  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
Had the subject simply followed the deputy's instructions, we wouldn't be having this discussion right now.
This is a logical fallacy (I have been sooooooo wanting to use that term somewhere ). We don't know that and it makes the assumption that riding on the sidewalk would have somehow protected him from harm. I think we all know that isn't the case.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 06:43 AM
  #91  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times in 829 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
This is a logical fallacy (I have been sooooooo wanting to use that term somewhere ). We don't know that and it makes the assumption that riding on the sidewalk would have somehow protected him from harm. I think we all know that isn't the case.
You broke it out at the wrong time though. We would not be having this discussion. Had he been killed on the sidewalk we would be having a very different discussion. Smilies for some strange reason aren't enabled. But let's play with that a bit. Had the bike been confiscated, what's to say he wouldn't have ended up a pedestrian fatality or a mugging victim? Cops are often placed in no win situations.

The bottom line in my opinion is that the officer's actions were reasonable and that they would withstand judicial scrutiny.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 09:39 AM
  #92  
Senior Member
 
trackhub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Watching all of you on O.B.I.T.
Posts: 2,023

Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1. Nicely restored

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by CitiZen
Sad news.
I've often wondered if it's somehow a badge of pride not to ride with lights of any kind...it seems so in my town.
It would certainly seem that way around suburban Boston as well. A badge of pride, or some kind of
tough guy-cool kids thing.
trackhub is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 10:25 AM
  #93  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Commodus is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 11:52 AM
  #94  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 437

Bikes: late 80's bianchi campion d'italia, early 90's trek 2100, early 90's shogun selectra, mid 90's aluminum marin xcMTB, dept. store grade but upgraded columbia double eagle tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by trackhub
It would certainly seem that way around suburban Boston as well. A badge of pride, or some kind of
tough guy-cool kids thing.
When I was a little younger I used to ride around at night on my light and reflectorless roadbike in black jeans and a black jacket and a black toque. It was most definitely a tough guy-cool kids thing.

I have since gone from that, to minimal "emergency" type lights, to the pb superflash/blaze combo, to now, where I have a cygolite 200 lumen "real" headlight and a radbot 1000 rear. at this rate, I'll be in reflective vest and helmet mirror territory in no time!

Edit: thats not just any old "black jacket", thats a black leather 5 pocket. And I will still ride at night in it. thats why I invested in good lights.
kludgefudge is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 02:34 PM
  #95  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
These days if you are just caught parked [while intoxicated], trying to sleep it off, you're gonna go to jail.
Yes, those cases have always struck me as counterproductive. I'd think we should encourage people who may realize that they've had a few too many to stop and sleep it off by the side of the road. The policy of still finding them guilty of DUI just provides an incentive for them to try to make it home instead.
prathmann is offline  
Old 08-07-10, 05:34 PM
  #96  
Senior Member
 
dougmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,040

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro, Strada

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by prathmann
The policy of still finding them guilty of DUI just provides an incentive for them to try to make it home instead.
MADD doesn't care ... if closing these "loopholes" means one more drunk driver is off the roads (even if many drunk non-drivers make it to jail), it's all been worth it.

How about the guy who got a DWI walking his bicycle across his front yard to his shed? ?
dougmc is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
recumbenttoad
Commuting
47
02-08-14 08:33 PM
panamapete
Road Cycling
26
09-13-11 08:44 AM
lineinthewater
Advocacy & Safety
35
11-08-10 05:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.