View Poll Results: Helmet wearing habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
178
10.66%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
94
5.63%
I've always worn a helmet
648
38.80%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
408
24.43%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
342
20.48%
Voters: 1670. You may not vote on this poll
The helmet thread
#2851
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
And then there are guys like me, who still believe that ability and intelligence are far more valuable than equipment. I mean, I'm glad the guy didn't get killed, but I'm amazed that a cyclist would cruise blithely through an intersection without even looking at oncoming traffic. And the helmeteers call me a Darwin candidate?
At any rate, I personally don't doubt that helmets save lives. But I think it's nearly impossible to use individual incidents to show anything useful. As I've written before, in the pre-helmet days people would land on their heads and then get up and think "Hope that never happens again." Now people land on their heads and immediately report in to BF to tell everyone how their lives were saved by their helmets. And, on occasion, cyclists still die from head injuries, regardless of what they have on their heads.
So the basic question, as always, is "If helmets save lives, why don't you wear one?" And the basic answer, as always, is "For the same reasons you don't wear one in the car, or the shower, or on foot, or..."
#2852
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Oh, and re. TdF speed: a few years ago I crunched the numbers all the way back to the start of the derailleur period, and it turns out that increases in average speed have been remarkably linear. They've been averaging 0.7 MPH faster each decade, all the way back through the 1940s.
I personally don't have an airtight theory as to why deaths have gone up, but I strongly doubt that it's because they're going 1.4 miles per hour faster now than they did in 1992.
I personally don't have an airtight theory as to why deaths have gone up, but I strongly doubt that it's because they're going 1.4 miles per hour faster now than they did in 1992.
#2853
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832
Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm going out on a limb (the one that supports a head) and I'll say that a head covered with some styrofoam will have less damage then one without if it meets a hard surface (concrete ,asphalt, car, tree). I've watched them drop eggs off two story buildings, and the ones in some sort of packaging tend to do better. Doesn't make sense to argue that point. The point most non-helmet people have is that they've chosen not to use one when they ride in low risk situations.
If "The point most non-helmet people have is that they've chosen not to use one when they ride in low risk situations", we would not have this debate. Neither would we have it if the helmet propagandists would care to read the relevant statistics.
Looks to me that either you haven't understood very much of the debate in this thread, or you have simply jumped to the end of it without at least trying to understand what the arguments are about.
That's rather poor debating style, IMO.
#2854
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
#2855
Senior Member
I'm going out on a limb (the one that supports a head) and I'll say that a head covered with some styrofoam will have less damage then one without if it meets a hard surface (concrete ,asphalt, car, tree). I've watched them drop eggs off two story buildings, and the ones in some sort of packaging tend to do better. Doesn't make sense to argue that point. The point most non-helmet people have is that they've chosen not to use one when they ride in low risk situations.
No one's saying helmets don't provide some protection. The argument lies in just how much protection they can provide. In my humble opinion, I find most people think they're suitable for conditions that are far beyond what they're capable of, probably as a result of the fearmongering needed to promote helmets. Most people aren't afraid of a fall similar to one that they may have when they trip, but they are afraid of collisions with cars, so they wear them for that, even if those collisions are not what helmets are made for.
#2856
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Funny, that's what I thought when I read your post.
There are tens of thousands of accumulated anecdotes in the form of population statistics that support the hypothesis that helmets make essentially no difference (apart from convincing morons to believe that they're "protected" when they wear one and diminishing cycling rates).
Helmets are a prominent display of ignorance, fear and incompetence.
There are tens of thousands of accumulated anecdotes in the form of population statistics that support the hypothesis that helmets make essentially no difference (apart from convincing morons to believe that they're "protected" when they wear one and diminishing cycling rates).
Helmets are a prominent display of ignorance, fear and incompetence.
#2857
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832
Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#2858
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 353
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Funny, that's what I thought when I read your post.
There are tens of thousands of accumulated anecdotes in the form of population statistics that support the hypothesis that helmets make essentially no difference (apart from convincing morons to believe that they're "protected" when they wear one and diminishing cycling rates).
Helmets are a prominent display of ignorance, fear and incompetence.
There are tens of thousands of accumulated anecdotes in the form of population statistics that support the hypothesis that helmets make essentially no difference (apart from convincing morons to believe that they're "protected" when they wear one and diminishing cycling rates).
Helmets are a prominent display of ignorance, fear and incompetence.
My ignorant self should have know better than to post in A&S. Since I'm feeling courageous, I think I'll go ride. I just hope while doing so my incompetence does not come though making my helmet a statistic for this debate rather than a moronic display as you suggest.
Have a nice day.
#2859
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
rx rider
Yeah sure you are doing 50 to 60 mph all the time. Your statement falls into the same group as----It tastes just as good as fresh perked!!!!!!
Yeah sure you are doing 50 to 60 mph all the time. Your statement falls into the same group as----It tastes just as good as fresh perked!!!!!!
#2860
Senior Member
Wearing a helmet or not wearing a helmet does not display ignorance, it's simply a choice a rider makes to provide whatever protection to his head that a helmet might provide. If you don't care to wear one, don't. There is no need to go calling those that choose to wear one morons, ignorant, fearful or incompetent unless you're just trying to inflate your ego.I
My ignorant self should have know better than to post in A&S. Since I'm feeling courageous, I think I'll go ride. I just hope while doing so my incompetence does not come though making my helmet a statistic for this debate rather than a moronic display as you suggest.
Have a nice day.
My ignorant self should have know better than to post in A&S. Since I'm feeling courageous, I think I'll go ride. I just hope while doing so my incompetence does not come though making my helmet a statistic for this debate rather than a moronic display as you suggest.
Have a nice day.
I'm just about to go for one too (but without a lid, because it wouldn't do much good in the unlikely event of being hit by a MV)
Last edited by closetbiker; 07-07-12 at 07:46 AM.
#2861
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832
Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#2862
Geck, wo ist mein Fahrrad
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Front Range
Posts: 715
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
do you need a geography lesson? Colorado has mountains. mountains are big, steep things with roads on them. when you ride a road bike on these roads it's very easy to exceed speed limits, both personal and legal. a helmet would do little to nothing to protect you at these speeds.
the 50 mile loop I ride has over 26,000 feet of climbing and I have yet to see a bent, they must all be at the coffee shop, admiring each other's helmets.
#2863
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Easy for you to say. Now, I'd like you to peddle your tolerant ass out to Nova Scotia, where I'm going to be cycling, and have you explain this to the cops there, that have the power to confiscate my bicycle if I indulge myself in the luxury you so graciously extend to me.
Oh, now, ... you! I didn't say that wearing a helmet proves that you're a moron! I said that morons believe they're protected by them. It's entirely possible that all the people wearing helmets (frequently incorrectly) have an accurate idea of the amount of protection they afford... not morons at all.
My ignorant self should have know better than to post in A&S. Since I'm feeling courageous, I think I'll go ride. I just hope while doing so my incompetence does not come though making my helmet a statistic for this debate rather than a moronic display as you suggest.
Have a nice day.
Have a nice day.
#2864
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 353
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Easy for you to say. Now, I'd like you to peddle your tolerant ass out to Nova Scotia, where I'm going to be cycling, and have you explain this to the cops there, that have the power to confiscate my bicycle if I indulge myself in the luxury you so graciously extend to me.
#2865
Senior Member
On the other hand, these laws provide motivation to research the issue, leading to more resistance and positions against them. Sadly though, great damage is done. Not only are these laws very hard to rescind, popular opinion is such that most think cycling is a dangerous thing to do, and helmets help in collisions with motor vehicles.
Last edited by closetbiker; 07-07-12 at 05:36 PM.
#2866
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
[/QUOTE]
You're not just whistling Dixie are you?
You're not just whistling Dixie are you?
#2867
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 353
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#2869
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832
Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#2871
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
rx rider
The last time I was in Colo comming down one of the passes on my bent I was doing 73 for a short time.
By the way I was wearing my helmet and was not paying any attention to wind noise.
The last time I was in Colo comming down one of the passes on my bent I was doing 73 for a short time.
By the way I was wearing my helmet and was not paying any attention to wind noise.
#2872
Geck, wo ist mein Fahrrad
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Front Range
Posts: 715
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
then why are you calling me a liar? just don't have anything else better to do these days? search wind noise and helmets, I'm not the only one that's bothered by it, but then I have good hearing.
#2873
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So I hope you can see why now it is inflammatory. It completely invalidates any of the reasoned argument that was presented about why wearing a helmet may not be necessary, because it implies that the only decision one who values his head can make is to wear a helmet. On the contrary, I don't care if you choose to wear a helmet, but I value my noggin' enough to use my noggin' in making choices.
Really not sure why you're having a hard time with this. Should be pretty obvious.
Last edited by sudo bike; 07-08-12 at 09:07 AM.
#2874
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes. It says something about how we should approach statistics. Have you for just ONE moment considered that the reason might not be that it's because they're intelligent but because they typically belong to a social class with a generally different life style and different risk assessment (AND have bought into the myths about the life-saving helmets)?
Last edited by sudo bike; 07-08-12 at 09:24 AM.
#2875
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,974
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
I think the reason IS obvious, given the lameness of the bogus "arguments" presented by some of the the ardent helmet proselytizers here and elsewhere on BF. Politeness and BF rules limit the degree to which a logic-impaired spade can be called a logic-impaired spade.