Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

The helmet thread

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.
View Poll Results: Helmet wearing habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
178
10.66%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
94
5.63%
I've always worn a helmet
648
38.80%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
408
24.43%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
342
20.48%
Voters: 1670. You may not vote on this poll

The helmet thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-12, 07:28 AM
  #2901  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
I really wish that Bell would reintroduce the Tourlite helmet they made in the middle 80s. It had a lexan shell that was around 1/8th of an inch thick. It wasnt that heavy and was tough as nails.
rydabent is offline  
Old 07-12-12, 07:48 AM
  #2902  
Part-time epistemologist
 
invisiblehand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,870

Bikes: Jamis Nova, Bike Friday triplet, Bike Friday NWT, STRIDA, Austro Daimler Vent Noir, Hollands Tourer

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 122 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Someone recently shared an interesting (IMO) overview of head/brain injuries and helmet.

Since I have a hard time keeping up with the thread, before posting this I checked to see whether it was shared earlier but neither the forum search tool nor Google displayed any posts with the link or some portion of the link and author's name. The forum search was not behaving well ... or I was using it badly ... so please forgive me if I missed an old post and this is old news. The paper is dated 2008. It's by Curnow who has written several other articles on bicycle helmets. However, the others I read were written years earlier.

https://www.cyclehelmets.org/papers/p787.pdf
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
invisiblehand is offline  
Old 07-12-12, 07:57 AM
  #2903  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832

Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
Many sports have safety equiptment. I fail to understand why a small vocal minority refuse to use safety equiptment for cycling.
Strange. I thought that a reason or two had been posted here, but I guess I was wrong.
hagen2456 is offline  
Old 07-12-12, 09:44 AM
  #2904  
Senior Member
 
Monster Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Warwick, UK
Posts: 1,049

Bikes: 2000-something 3 speed commuter, 1990-something Raleigh Scorpion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by rydabent
Many sports have safety equiptment. I fail to understand why a small vocal minority refuse to use safety equiptment for cycling.
Because for the majority of cyclists worldwide, cycling is a means of transportation, not a sport. The risks associated with general transportation riding in good conditions aren't high enough to warrant the limited protective ability of a bicycle helmet.
Monster Pete is offline  
Old 07-12-12, 09:48 AM
  #2905  
Senior Member
 
rekmeyata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times in 204 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
I really wish that Bell would reintroduce the Tourlite helmet they made in the middle 80s. It had a lexan shell that was around 1/8th of an inch thick. It wasnt that heavy and was tough as nails.
I use to have one of those, I forgot about it till you mentioned it. That shell was indeed tough, nothing since then has been made that was ever been that tough by any manufacture. I wonder why Bell stopped making it? Maybe the helmet lasted too long and they felt it wouldn't get consumers to buy more frequently? Maybe cyclists were complaining of the weight and moved to lighter helmets forcing Bell to make a lighter helmet? I do remember that the Tourlite got rave reviews by all the testing agencies, so I know they didn't stop making it due to safety concerns, the only concern I had with it was it didn't have adequate venting but that could have been easily done if Bell chose too.

If I remember correctly I think that helmet came out in the late 70's and was gone by the mid 80's. I know I had the helmet for at least 4 years until my head went through a cars side window in 84 which crushed the styrofoam but did nothing to the shell. And the styrofoam they used was white instead of the black stuff, and during those 4 some odd years I had it the styrofoam never started to deterate like the black does just after only 1 year of use.
rekmeyata is offline  
Old 07-12-12, 10:33 AM
  #2906  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,974

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times in 1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
Many sports have safety equiptment. I fail to understand why a small vocal minority refuse to use safety equiptment for cycling.
Originally Posted by hagen2456
Strange. I thought that a reason or two had been posted here, but I guess I was wrong.
Given his previous posts on this thread, the "failure to understand" is not strange at all.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 07-12-12, 03:18 PM
  #2907  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
My helmet didn't save my life...


because I wasn't wearing one.

Yesterday I was involved in a collision with a motor vehicle. I was negotiating a roundabout, I had the right of way, a car drove straight out in front of me, I had no opportunity to avoid it. I was catapulted over the car into the roadway. My shoulder and the side of my unhelmeted head struck the road. I have a separated shoulder joint and a lump on my head.

It occurred to me afterwards that had I been wearing a helmet, it would very probably have sustained some damage and that I might well have concluded that it had saved me from serious injury. But in fact what happened was that my skull struck the roadway with a single, glancing blow. I had a mild headache for about an hour and some residual tenderness of the scalp. My head did not rotate on impact, tests have shown no neurological deficit, I'm fine. (My shoulder is a bit of a mess, though).

This was the result of most such incidents before helmets became prevalent. For the most part, bumping one's head is unpleasant but not serious.

It also occurred to me that had I been wearing a helmet it is at least possible that the outcome might have been worse, given the reported tendency of helmets to increase the extent to which the head rotates. It's possible, if unlikely, that not wearing a helmet saved my life.

I value my noggin too highly to wear a helmet.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 07-12-12, 04:09 PM
  #2908  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's been educational for me to understand the negative effect that mandantory helmet laws have on ridership.
leona88 is offline  
Old 07-12-12, 06:52 PM
  #2909  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
My helmet didn't save my life...


because I wasn't wearing one.

Yesterday I was involved in a collision with a motor vehicle. I was negotiating a roundabout, I had the right of way, a car drove straight out in front of me, I had no opportunity to avoid it. I was catapulted over the car into the roadway. My shoulder and the side of my unhelmeted head struck the road. I have a separated shoulder joint and a lump on my head.

It occurred to me afterwards that had I been wearing a helmet, it would very probably have sustained some damage and that I might well have concluded that it had saved me from serious injury. But in fact what happened was that my skull struck the roadway with a single, glancing blow. I had a mild headache for about an hour and some residual tenderness of the scalp. My head did not rotate on impact, tests have shown no neurological deficit, I'm fine. (My shoulder is a bit of a mess, though).

This was the result of most such incidents before helmets became prevalent. For the most part, bumping one's head is unpleasant but not serious.

It also occurred to me that had I been wearing a helmet it is at least possible that the outcome might have been worse, given the reported tendency of helmets to increase the extent to which the head rotates. It's possible, if unlikely, that not wearing a helmet saved my life.

I value my noggin too highly to wear a helmet.
Well, let me be the first to say I'm glad you're (more-or-less) okay. Thank god you didn't have a helmet on.
Six jours is offline  
Old 07-12-12, 08:39 PM
  #2910  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by njkayaker
That's pretty-much the bizarre conclusion of the article. The article comes darn close to calling road bicyclists "names".
Why is it "bizarre"?

There are two probabilities to consider:

1. The probability that a helmet will perform some sort of protective function in a particular type of crash
2. The probability of experiencing that particular type of crash.

The article suggests that slower-moving, facilities-riding commuters have lower values for 2 and hence have less need for 1.

Originally Posted by njkayaker
Maybe. But given the clear bias against "roadies" in the article, it's not clear that it can be trusted as being an accurate portrayal of the data. Since it supports your side, you accept it non-critically.
I don't see where you get the bias against roadies thing from it. It's just pointing out that it's a mistake to lump together riskier activities on a bike with less-risky ones. It's the same problem that bedevils emergency-room admission statistics: you don't know if the person presenting was a food-delivery guy riding on the sidewalk in a rush with a basket loaded with orders, or someone riding a recumbent with a magic hat on their head and a homeopathic car-repelling forcefield.

You should think a bit before you reject information that doesn't automatically confirm your predjudices.
RazrSkutr is offline  
Old 07-12-12, 08:41 PM
  #2911  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Here's to a speedy recovery

Glad you're as OK as one could be expected to be.

I hate to think what might have happened if you'd been wearing a helmet.
RazrSkutr is offline  
Old 07-13-12, 03:00 AM
  #2912  
Senior Member
 
paulkal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 952

Bikes: 2007 Nagasawa with C-Record, 1992 Duell with Croce D'aune/Chorus, three Gazelles, M5 recumbent

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
My helmet didn't save my life...


because I wasn't wearing one.

Yesterday I was involved in a collision with a motor vehicle. I was negotiating a roundabout, I had the right of way, a car drove straight out in front of me, I had no opportunity to avoid it. I was catapulted over the car into the roadway. My shoulder and the side of my unhelmeted head struck the road. I have a separated shoulder joint and a lump on my head.

It occurred to me afterwards that had I been wearing a helmet, it would very probably have sustained some damage and that I might well have concluded that it had saved me from serious injury. But in fact what happened was that my skull struck the roadway with a single, glancing blow. I had a mild headache for about an hour and some residual tenderness of the scalp. My head did not rotate on impact, tests have shown no neurological deficit, I'm fine. (My shoulder is a bit of a mess, though).

This was the result of most such incidents before helmets became prevalent. For the most part, bumping one's head is unpleasant but not serious.

It also occurred to me that had I been wearing a helmet it is at least possible that the outcome might have been worse, given the reported tendency of helmets to increase the extent to which the head rotates. It's possible, if unlikely, that not wearing a helmet saved my life.

I value my noggin too highly to wear a helmet.

Good to hear that you still living. Next time you should wear a helmet, to claim that it saved your life.
Last year I had a similar experience, came of my bike, nurt my arm, leg and head. No helmet and still living. The worst thing was that my front wheel was damaged, a nice Campagnolo Zonda.
paulkal is offline  
Old 07-13-12, 03:08 AM
  #2913  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by paulkal
Last year I had a similar experience, came of my bike, nurt my arm, leg and head. No helmet and still living. The worst thing was that my front wheel was damaged, a nice Campagnolo Zonda.
Ah, the bike. Sadly, my beautiful 1984 Reynolds 531 Raleigh Royal is no more.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 07-13-12, 10:17 AM
  #2914  
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
 
AlmostTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398

Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times in 504 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
My helmet didn't save my life...


because I wasn't wearing one.

Yesterday I was involved in a collision with a motor vehicle. I was negotiating a roundabout, I had the right of way, a car drove straight out in front of me, I had no opportunity to avoid it. I was catapulted over the car into the roadway. My shoulder and the side of my unhelmeted head struck the road. I have a separated shoulder joint and a lump on my head.

It occurred to me afterwards that had I been wearing a helmet, it would very probably have sustained some damage and that I might well have concluded that it had saved me from serious injury. But in fact what happened was that my skull struck the roadway with a single, glancing blow. I had a mild headache for about an hour and some residual tenderness of the scalp. My head did not rotate on impact, tests have shown no neurological deficit, I'm fine. (My shoulder is a bit of a mess, though).

This was the result of most such incidents before helmets became prevalent. For the most part, bumping one's head is unpleasant but not serious.

It also occurred to me that had I been wearing a helmet it is at least possible that the outcome might have been worse, given the reported tendency of helmets to increase the extent to which the head rotates. It's possible, if unlikely, that not wearing a helmet saved my life.

I value my noggin too highly to wear a helmet.
It’s also possible you may have only had a “mild headache” for 30 minutes instead of an hour, without the slightest bit of rotation. No one really knows for sure now, do they? Your supposition about what “might have” happened really has little to no concrete evidence to support it.

Moral of the story: People with strong convictions either way regarding the helmet issue are going to make assumptions of possible outcomes that will match their beliefs. No surprise there, now is there? Helmeteers do it, and Styrofoam skeptics do it too. Yay helmet thread!

Best wishes for a quick and full recovery for your shoulder.
AlmostTrick is offline  
Old 07-13-12, 10:35 AM
  #2915  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
In my opinion, there is a strong negative correlation between wearing helmets and having a sense of humour.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 07-13-12, 12:07 PM
  #2916  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
It also occurred to me that had I been wearing a helmet it is at least possible that the outcome might have been worse, given the reported tendency of helmets to increase the extent to which the head rotates. It's possible, if unlikely, that not wearing a helmet saved my life.

I value my noggin too highly to wear a helmet.
Sorry to hear about your accident and all best wishes toward a speedy recovery.

The reported tendency of rotational injury due to helmet use is inconclusive at best. There's no real way you can say wearing a helmet would have made it worse, just as if you were wearing a helmet you might falsely claim that wearing a helmet helped in your situation. And then of course there's helmets available, like the POC MIPS selections, which are actually designed to mitigate rotational injury.

Also, because this was a less than serious head injury, there's really no data available to corroborate your claim that a helmet would not have helped -- most studies posted here deal only with reported serious injuries.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 07-13-12, 12:08 PM
  #2917  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
Ah, the bike. Sadly, my beautiful 1984 Reynolds 531 Raleigh Royal is no more.
Oh, noez!!!! That's the worst -- you'll heal; the bike, not so much. Sorry to hear it.

Originally Posted by chasm54
In my opinion, there is a strong negative correlation between wearing helmets and having a sense of humour.
Huh. Seems to me there's more a negative correlation between those who post here and having a sense of humor, helmet use status regardless...
mconlonx is offline  
Old 07-13-12, 12:11 PM
  #2918  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by invisiblehand
Someone recently shared an interesting (IMO) overview of head/brain injuries and helmet.

Since I have a hard time keeping up with the thread, before posting this I checked to see whether it was shared earlier but neither the forum search tool nor Google displayed any posts with the link or some portion of the link and author's name. The forum search was not behaving well ... or I was using it badly ... so please forgive me if I missed an old post and this is old news. The paper is dated 2008. It's by Curnow who has written several other articles on bicycle helmets. However, the others I read were written years earlier.

https://www.cyclehelmets.org/papers/p787.pdf
I'm going to say this is much more important regarding MHLs v. ridership and the overall societal cost of implementing useless nanny-state legislation than it is about helmet efficacy under crash conditions for which they were designed.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 07-13-12, 02:15 PM
  #2919  
Bicikli Huszár
 
sudo bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116

Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mconlonx
Huh. Seems to me there's more a negative correlation between those who post here and having a sense of humor, helmet use status regardless...
It is seemingly more of an A&S-wide problem, actually.
sudo bike is offline  
Old 07-13-12, 03:06 PM
  #2920  
Gone.
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 509
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: png
argument_victory.png (55.1 KB, 15 views)
corvuscorvax is offline  
Old 07-13-12, 03:18 PM
  #2921  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832

Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
Ah, the bike. Sadly, my beautiful 1984 Reynolds 531 Raleigh Royal is no more.
Aaargh!

(They really should start producing helmets for bikes. Might have saved yours)
hagen2456 is offline  
Old 07-13-12, 03:20 PM
  #2922  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832

Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
In my opinion, there is a strong negative correlation between wearing helmets and having a sense of humour.
Heh!

I dare not think what might have happened to your sense of humour, had you worn a helmet...
hagen2456 is offline  
Old 07-15-12, 06:53 AM
  #2923  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
Members of the anti helmet cult really are a humorless group. Just mention that the anti helmet crowd makes good organ donors, and just watch the laugh and giggle.
rydabent is offline  
Old 07-15-12, 09:33 AM
  #2924  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
Members of the anti helmet cult really are a humorless group.
So are you.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 07-15-12, 09:45 AM
  #2925  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by mconlonx
I'm going to say this is much more important regarding MHLs v. ridership and the overall societal cost of implementing useless nanny-state legislation than it is about helmet efficacy under crash conditions for which they were designed.
I brought it (https://www.aqmd.gov/news1/1999/in_car_facts.htm Canberra study of total cost of requiring helmets vs medical costs) up earlier I think, and I've seen reference to the study from several others.

I agree it is about the cost of "useless nanny state regulations" but about one specifically: requiring bicycle helmets in Australia. Cost to society exceeded the extra medical costs that would result from not requiring helmets. It kind of blows a hole in the argument that one person refusing to wear a helmet makes another person pay for it indirectly, and hence is the latter's business.

BTW, there is one more reason to wear a helmet that I don't think has been mentioned yet. For every news article about a bicycle accident the reporter seems somehow compelled to state whether or not the rider was wearing a helmet. As if it largely determines his culpability. Should I have an accident, heaven forbid, I'm loath to have them smearing my name in that fashion - I want them reporting that "the cyclist was wearing a helmet" - and had lights for that matter - so the average clueless reader will conclude that I was doing everything right instead of being negligent.

Last edited by wphamilton; 07-15-12 at 09:50 AM.
wphamilton is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.