View Poll Results: Helmet wearing habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
178
10.66%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
94
5.63%
I've always worn a helmet
648
38.80%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
408
24.43%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
342
20.48%
Voters: 1670. You may not vote on this poll
The helmet thread
#7502
Senior Member
No they don't. Not any more, a few decades + ago they did... Now it's all about getting their clients off, or getting their clients more money, it no longer has anything to do with "Justice", their whole reason for existing has been perverted to winning their case, right or wrong it's win, win, win, doesn't matter how... JMO as I see it.
Last edited by 350htrr; 04-27-14 at 05:25 PM.
#7503
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,965
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,530 Times
in
1,042 Posts
It's something the pro-helmeteers have touted at various points -- not wearing a helmet is perceived as negligent conduct. Will hopefully not figure into an actual court case, but certainly is effective on the lawyer's part in the court of public opinion.
Also makes me wonder how much of the public, and among just cyclists, views helmetless riding as irresponsible.
Also makes me wonder how much of the public, and among just cyclists, views helmetless riding as irresponsible.
What other "public opinion" views can you "tout" as relevant to this case?
#7504
Senior Member
Why do you think the lawyer for the driver mentioned helmet use in public?
#7506
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
Again as I have posted many times, aside from the safety aspect of a helmet, because of the legal aspects in case of an accident, wearing a helmet is legal protection. So many time we have read that even if a driver is drunk, hits a cyclist on a wide shoulder, the drivers lawyer will claim the cyclist is at fault if he is not wearing a helmet.
If a cyclist is fortunate enough to survive an accident caused by a drunk driver, or a driver using his damned cell phone, short circuit the ignorant ploy of the drivers lawyer claiming the cyclist was at fault because he wasnt wearing a helmet. For some ignorant reason courts and juries seem to have it in their mind that even if the accident was caused by bad driving if the cyclist didnt have a helmet on somehow it was the cyclist fault for getting hurt. So--------------even if you dont like or belive in helmets, wear one and protect yourself legally.
If a cyclist is fortunate enough to survive an accident caused by a drunk driver, or a driver using his damned cell phone, short circuit the ignorant ploy of the drivers lawyer claiming the cyclist was at fault because he wasnt wearing a helmet. For some ignorant reason courts and juries seem to have it in their mind that even if the accident was caused by bad driving if the cyclist didnt have a helmet on somehow it was the cyclist fault for getting hurt. So--------------even if you dont like or belive in helmets, wear one and protect yourself legally.
#7508
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,965
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,530 Times
in
1,042 Posts
Grasping at straws and hoping for a jury of know nothing morons, like a few of the irrational obtuse posters on this thread.
#7509
Cycle Dallas
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of Gar, TX
Posts: 3,777
Bikes: Dulcinea--2017 Kona Rove & a few others
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
I don't understand why they say it will take months to change this city ordinance?
When this law was ruled unconstitutional, several years back, the mayor and the chief of police issued a statement that the law would not be enforced while it was appealed to a higher court. Unfortunately, the higher court overturned the ruling so enforcement resumed.
Push to repeal Dallas? helmet ordinance receives boost from some council members | Dallas Morning News
When this law was ruled unconstitutional, several years back, the mayor and the chief of police issued a statement that the law would not be enforced while it was appealed to a higher court. Unfortunately, the higher court overturned the ruling so enforcement resumed.
Push to repeal Dallas? helmet ordinance receives boost from some council members | Dallas Morning News
#7510
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Unexpected Downside to an Expensive New Helmet
I finally got my high-dollar helmet in, (not to make anyone jealous, it was $28! ) and attached my sound system and lady-bug mp3 player and headlight mount, but now I don't want to risk scratching it. So when I went to the store last night after the rain I left it safe at home. Pieces are falling off my old one, so it wasn't worth the bother either. So because of my nice new helmet, I was riding without protection. I'm just glad I didn't pick a $150 helmet, because then I'd feel too guilty about not using it and probably just take the car.
Just a word of caution, if you're tempted to splurge on that new helmet.
Just a word of caution, if you're tempted to splurge on that new helmet.
#7511
Senior Member
Just trying to get discussion going:
Is not wearing a helmet deemed irresponsible by a majority of the public? A majority of cyclists?
If so, since it's obviously not irresponsible but not reasonably held as such, is public perception enough to warrant wearing a helmet? Do you want to be reported as "not wearing a helmet" in the case of a reported incident, either police or media report?
If it extends to legal arguments, is it worth having worn a helmet only to mitigate legal exposure? To look better in they media circus court of public opinion?
#7512
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,965
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,530 Times
in
1,042 Posts
If so, negative public perception equally warrants never wearing so-called bicycling kit in public, especially tight fitting spandex shorts/bibs, doubly especially with bicycling shoes that force the cyclist to walk with a mincing clicky gait.
Sticking to helmet wear, if public perception ruled out looking like a dork/doofus where would the current stable of helmets find any customers?
Sticking to helmet wear, if public perception ruled out looking like a dork/doofus where would the current stable of helmets find any customers?
#7514
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 885
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
lawyers dont lie, they create doubt and represent their client
as this is actually my job, most hate 'we' recieve is simply due to lack of understanding, forcing their own moral onto others and blaming the law to do the same, but the law is there and their moral stance change depending whether they sue or being sued
#7515
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 885
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#7516
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,512
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1430 Post(s)
Liked 330 Times
in
218 Posts
Many who smoke cigarettes STILL don't believe smoking causes health problems. Or the joy of drawing nicotine into their lungs outweighs the eventual, probable (but not certain) consequences.
Many who drink alcohol to excess STILL think they can handle driving a motor vehicle. They are willing to take the chance that they will get caught or cause an accident.
Many people have expensive hairstyles that they don't want crushed by a bike helmet. Or they think a helmet is just too geeky looking. Peer pressure can be a factor. And many people just CAN'T STAND something - anything - on their head. They are willing to take their chances. Others are just stubborn.
There you go.
Last edited by JoeyBike; 04-29-14 at 09:32 AM.
#7517
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 885
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No they don't. Not any more, a few decades + ago they did... Now it's all about getting their clients off, or getting their clients more money, it no longer has anything to do with "Justice", their whole reason for existing has been perverted to winning their case, right or wrong it's win, win, win, doesn't matter how... JMO as I see it.
#7518
Cycle Year Round
No one cares if you wear a helmet or not. That has been said many times and you insist on ignoring it, no one is trying to take away your right to wear one, why do you want to take away our right to not wear one?
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#7519
Cycle Year Round
Who brought lies into this?
lawyers dont lie, they create doubt and represent their client
as this is actually my job, most hate 'we' recieve is simply due to lack of understanding, forcing their own moral onto others and blaming the law to do the same, but the law is there and their moral stance change depending whether they sue or being sued
lawyers dont lie, they create doubt and represent their client
as this is actually my job, most hate 'we' recieve is simply due to lack of understanding, forcing their own moral onto others and blaming the law to do the same, but the law is there and their moral stance change depending whether they sue or being sued
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#7521
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,670
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5767 Post(s)
Liked 2,540 Times
in
1,406 Posts
So the logical question isn't why not wear a helmet, it's why wear one.
Your simple answer is that it's dangerous to ride without one, which is an opinion you're entitled to. But others may not feel the level of risk is high enough, and therefore don't . It's that simple, it's not about helmets, it's about the rik of head injury and how to manage it.
The risk assessment issue represents a spectrum, and some may feel that it's too risky to ride a bicycle without a helmet, others may feel that it's too risky altogether and not ride at all, especially on public roads.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#7523
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,789
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12739 Post(s)
Liked 7,652 Times
in
4,058 Posts
#7524
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
CB
Point out anywhere that I am trying to force you or anyone to wear a helmet. I have in fact posted many times I am against MLHs. I am only saying that wearing a helmet is the intelligent thing to do.
Point out anywhere that I am trying to force you or anyone to wear a helmet. I have in fact posted many times I am against MLHs. I am only saying that wearing a helmet is the intelligent thing to do.