![]() |
Originally Posted by rydabent
(Post 13644048)
What about the survey conducted about 3 years ago that showed that the higher the IQ the more likely the person was to wear a helmet????
People with higher IQs generally have higher incomes and even though they do not look at the research, they will use that extra money that lower IQ/income people will not spend just to FEEL safer. You would think that you would use some of your IQ to figure it out. But with your prior post, there is little hope of that. |
I don't know about higher IQs, but the "protecting the boys" thread finally convinced me to take my helmet off today. There's such a thing as too much of an obsession with safety. If it gets to the point where I have to wear body armor to ride my bike, I'd rather hang it up and walk, or drive, or take the bus. So, for the first time in about 20 years, I rode without a helmet - and did it in pretty heavy traffic. In case anyone was wondering, the world didn't end.
|
tony
Well you got away with it once anyway!! |
Originally Posted by rydabent
(Post 13662626)
tony
Well you got away with it once anyway!! It's just that the image of riding with helmet, a cup, maybe knee and elbow protectors, etc, trying to make so sure that I can't possibly get hurt that I can't even experience the joy and freedom of riding anymore, made me start thinking that either I should suck it up and accept the risk of possibly hurting myself on the bicycle, or hanging the damn thing up and doing something else instead of riding. I could see it getting to the point where it just isn't fun anymore. I'm going out to take a ride now. I wonder if I'll wear the helmet or not... |
Originally Posted by tony_merlino
(Post 13662916)
... the image of riding with helmet, a cup, maybe knee and elbow protectors, etc, trying to make so sure that I can't possibly get hurt that I can't even experience the joy and freedom of riding anymore, made me start thinking that either I should suck it up and accept the risk of possibly hurting myself on the bicycle, or hanging the damn thing up and doing something else instead of riding. I could see it getting to the point where it just isn't fun anymore...
I am not happy with an America, or any country, in which simple, basic, and healthy activities like walking and cycling are perceived as dangerous, aberrant, and in need of tight regulation, protective gear, and police surveillance. another video I found worth the 16 minutes needed to watch hits on the same issue, the culture of fear and how it interferes with, "The Good Life: |
Happy new years!
Hope everybody is staying safe, keeping those helmets properly fastened and their wits about them while out on the roads. Please remember, it's fun to "debate" something on the internet with a bunch of amateurs, but it is a bad move to ignore advice from your loved ones and experts. These amateur anti-helmet people won't care and aren't professionally responsible for you if something happens. They don't subject their own crock-pot theories to half the criticism leveled at people who advocate wearing helmets. Good luck in 2012 and use your brains to stay safe and prevent injury not to break your fall. |
Originally Posted by electrik
(Post 13663720)
Please remember, it's fun to "debate" something on the internet with a bunch of amateurs, but it is a bad move to ignore advice from your loved ones and experts. These amateur anti-helmet people won't care and aren't professionally responsible for you if something happens. They don't subject their own crock-pot theories to half the criticism leveled at people who advocate wearing helmets. |
Originally Posted by electrik
(Post 13663720)
Happy new years
Hope everybody is staying safe, keeping those helmets properly fastened and their wits about them while out on the roads. Please remember, it's fun to "debate" something on the internet with a bunch of amateurs, but it is a bad move to ignore advice from your loved ones and experts. Also I would never recommend someone ignore the feelings of their loved ones. I explained to my wife why I chose not to wear a helmet and, being the sharp cookie she is, she saw the evidence and has no problem with it (Plus, she's European and not subject to the culture of fear we have here in the first place). If it really, really bothered her, I'd probably sport it anyway just for her peace of mind. Like the decision to wear or not wear one in the first place, it's a personal decision with personal reasons behind it; there's no right or wrong decision (except for a decision made in ignorance, IMO). These amateur anti-helmet people won't care and aren't professionally responsible for you if something happens. They don't subject their own crock-pot theories to half the criticism leveled at people who advocate wearing helmets. Good luck in 2012 and use your brains to stay safe and prevent injury not to break your fall. |
While helmet skeptics often cite a variety of reasons for their skepticism, helmet advocates usually rely on anecdotes and a few scientific studies for their faith in foam.
Just one of the reasons helmet skeptics are skeptical is that some of these scientific studies cited by helmet advocates are of poor quality and designed with a pre-ordained result. Yesterday, one of Canada's national newspapers ran an article on this type of "junk science". It's for the reasons within it that some people become skeptical of certain "studies" How one man got away with mass fraud by saying ‘trust me, it’s science’ When news broke this year that Diederik Stapel, a prominent Dutch social psychologist, was faking his results on dozens of experiments, the fallout was swift, brutal and global. Science and Nature, the world’s top chroniclers of science, were forced to retract papers that had received wide popular attention, including one that seemed to link messiness with racism, because “disordered contexts (such as litter or a broken-up sidewalk and an abandoned bicycle) indeed promote stereotyping and discrimination.” As a result, some of Prof. Stapel’s junior colleagues lost their entire publication output; Tilburg University launched a criminal fraud case; Prof. Stapel himself returned his PhD and sought mental health care; and the entire field of social psychology — in which human behaviour is statistically analyzed — fell under a pall of suspicion. |
Originally Posted by closetbiker
(Post 13666195)
While helmet skeptics often cite a variety of reasons for their skepticism, helmet advocates usually rely on anecdotes and a few scientific studies for their faith in foam.
Just one of the reasons helmet skeptics are skeptical is that some of these scientific studies cited by helmet advocates are of poor quality and designed with a pre-ordained result. And then, of course, there's this one: http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/...l.pmed.0020124, quoted by someone else, also a few hundred pages back :P |
Speaking of fear that the anti helmet crowd is always talking about, why do they fear a helmet???
|
Oh now that is just silly. No one has said they fear a helmet- it's not like it's going to eat your head like the headcrabs from half-life. We just don't wear them because there's no need.
(Awaits headcrab styled helmet) http://files.sharenator.com/headcrab...-29800-580.jpg |
I wonder if members of the anti helmet crowd was psychoanalyzed, what would the doctor say about them.
|
Never contributed to these threads before, but why the hell not?
If I'm commuting or on a road ride, I wear a helmet. If I'm in "pedestrian mode" either on campus or generally off the street I won't bother. If I'm riding offroad in the context of trail riding, I will be wearing a helmet. A helmet is not a burden, nor is it a savior. I don't have any strong predisposition for or against helmets. I believe if you don't want to wear a helmet, then it's your decision. I ride with plenty of folks who don't bother and I don't hassle them. However, I have seen helmets save lives, yet I've never seen a helmetless rider saved by not wearing a helmet. Obviously there are many more factors present when you're talking about an accident serious enough for a helmet to factor in. However, helmets have saved lives. So for me, my wife, and my unborn daughter, I'll keep wearing a helmet. It may just make THE difference one day. Here's hoping it never has to come to that. |
Originally Posted by WalksOn2Wheels
(Post 13688024)
However, I have seen helmets save lives, yet I've never seen a helmetless rider saved by not wearing a helmet. Obviously there are many more factors present when you're talking about an accident serious enough for a helmet to factor in. However, helmets have saved lives.
So for me, my wife, and my unborn daughter, I'll keep wearing a helmet. It may just make THE difference one day. Here's hoping it never has to come to that. |
mcon
Your reply is a classic example of the anti-helmet crowd attacking ANYONE that is in favor of using a helmet. It is the classic action of a troll. |
I've rarely seen any poster participate so much and understand so little.
|
Originally Posted by rydabent
(Post 13691618)
mcon
Your reply is a classic example of the anti-helmet crowd attacking ANYONE that is in favor of using a helmet. It is the classic action of a troll. Trouble is, you're as bad as any of the worst helmet haterz. And have about as much of a sense of humor. Walk's post was spot on right up until the portion I quoted. |
Originally Posted by rydabent
(Post 13687946)
I wonder if members of the anti helmet crowd was psychoanalyzed, what would the doctor say about them.
|
Originally Posted by Six jours
(Post 13692174)
I've rarely seen any poster participate so much and understand so little.
“Ah, but a man's postings should exceed his concepts, or what's a forum for?” |
Originally Posted by Six jours
(Post 13692174)
I've rarely seen any poster participate so much and understand so little.
|
Unfortunately the cyclist may have been able to walk away from this one if they'd had a lid on. Pray for the victim. Do us all a favour and wear your lids.
A cyclist is in critical condition with serious head injuries after colliding with a dog while riding in Uxbridge, northeast of Toronto. Durham Region police say the 48-year-old Pickering man was not wearing a helmet when he was thrown from his bike Monday afternoon. Police say two dogs ran out onto the roadway from a nearby residence and the cyclist hit one of them, a shepherd mix. A passing motorist stopped to help and emergency services were called. The cyclist was taken to hospital in Newmarket and then transferred to Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto where he remains in critical condition. One of the dogs was injured and taken to the vet by its owner, while the other dog was not hurt. |
Originally Posted by electrik
(Post 13706955)
Unfortunately the cyclist may have been able to walk away from this one if they'd had a lid on. Pray for the victim. Do us all a favour and wear your lids.
Do us all a favour and wear your lids, when walking :D Pedestrian suffers serious head injuries in collision |
Originally Posted by closetbiker
(Post 13707178)
Unfortunately, a pedestrian may have been able to walk away from this one if he had a lid on.
Do us all a favour and wear your lids, when walking :D Pedestrian suffers serious head injuries in collision |
Originally Posted by Six jours
(Post 13707260)
Unfortunately, a golfer may have been able to walk away from this one if he'd had a lid on.
Do us all a favor and wear your lids when golfing. http://www.newson6.com/story/1501974...from-golf-cart Good luck Six jours, may you never end up like the victims you mock. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:14 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.