Study: Bike lanes don't reduce severity of bike/car crashes
#1
LET'S ROLL
Thread Starter
Study: Bike lanes don't reduce severity of bike/car crashes
“Our findings show that bike lanes or paved shoulders by themselves do not significantly reduce the severity of injuries sustained by cyclists,” says co-author Dietrich Jehle, MD, professor of emergency medicine in the UB School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences and at Erie County Medical Center. “The data show that other factors may be more important in reducing the severity of cyclists’ injuries, including the speed of motor vehicles traveling near them and how much light there is.”
Read the full article:
https://www.king5.com/news/Study-Bike...209988921.html
Read the full article:
https://www.king5.com/news/Study-Bike...209988921.html
__________________
One day: www.youtube.com/watch?v=20X43026ukY&list=UUHyRS8bRu6zPoymgKaIoDLA&index=1
One day: www.youtube.com/watch?v=20X43026ukY&list=UUHyRS8bRu6zPoymgKaIoDLA&index=1
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,144
Bikes: Schwinn Tourist (2010), Trek 6000 (1999)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't think they reduce the severity, per se. However, they've shown to reduce the numbers of them, when properly designed.
#3
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
And, bike lanes are frequently installed in conjunction with a road diet or other traffic calming measures that reduce vehicle speeds, reducing severity in the event of a collision.
#4
Senior Member
Duh. No shiet, getting bumped by a car going 50MPH on a bike lane I would "suspect" would be the same result as where there isn't a bike lane.... JMO
#5
Senior Member
#6
----
Does this seem like a report that was just looking for a reason why "bike lanes don't work"? I mean in some ways it makes about as much sense as saying, " Bicyclists must pedal just as hard to go 20 mph whether they are in a bike lane or not." the conclusion being " no advantage to a bike lane shown by this study."
The article does state:
But does so in such a way is to imply that this research disputes that.
Very poorly written article. Interesting read in that it is so odd.
The article does state:
Previous research has shown that bike lanes do reduce the number of bike-motor vehicle accidents that occur.
Very poorly written article. Interesting read in that it is so odd.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 1,914
Bikes: Rans Stratus, Trek 1420, Rivendell Rambouillet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Frequency and Severity are both important.
Anyone have a link to the actual study? Everyone here is reacting to news stories about the study, and not the study itself. This is not a primary source document, but is secondary or possibly even third-hand. I would like to see the actual study, and what the specifics are. I have tried a Google search, and only get news stories about the study.
Having noted this, please read this statement from the news article:
In the safety profession, we have an ANSI Standard known as Z10-2005, American National Standard for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems. In that there is a tool called the Risk Assessment Matrix. I have modified it slightly with a numerical system (I have worked in professional safety for 35 years or so):
https://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y76...mentMatrix.jpg
If you look at it, frequency is as important as severity. You can see that even if the severity is catastrophic or critical, if the likelihood of occurrence is remote (not likely to occur) or improbable (very unlikely, may assume exposure will not happen), the risk assessment matrix is much different than if it were frequent (likely to occur repeatedly) or probable (likely to occur several times).
Here is a quote from another study from Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future at the Bloomberg School of Public Health on bike lanes, which does have a link to the actual study:
John
Having noted this, please read this statement from the news article:
The UB study examined whether cyclists injured in accidents with motor vehicles while traveling in bike lanes had less severe injuries than cyclists traveling in the same lanes as motor vehicles. Previous research has shown that bike lanes do reduce the number of bike-motor vehicle accidents that occur.
https://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y76...mentMatrix.jpg
If you look at it, frequency is as important as severity. You can see that even if the severity is catastrophic or critical, if the likelihood of occurrence is remote (not likely to occur) or improbable (very unlikely, may assume exposure will not happen), the risk assessment matrix is much different than if it were frequent (likely to occur repeatedly) or probable (likely to occur several times).
Here is a quote from another study from Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future at the Bloomberg School of Public Health on bike lanes, which does have a link to the actual study:
...The study looked at drivers’ behavior around cyclists on roads with and without bike lanes, and the good news is that drivers pass significantly wider when cyclists are in bike lanes.
The bad news is that on roads without bike lanes, drivers had trouble sharing the road with cyclists, which at times violated a state law aimed at making cycling safer. In 2010, Maryland passed what is known as the “3-foot law,” which states that drivers must pass cyclists by three feet or more. The study authors found that one in six Baltimore drivers, or about 17 percent, violated the 3-foot law.
Researcher David Love, PhD, says that, “We knew the 3-foot law was not being followed. Now we have quantified the problem and provided a baseline from which the city can improve upon.”
The researchers found a 20 percent increase in motorist adherence to the 3-foot law for bike lane streets compared to standard streets. Violations became virtually non-existent in bike lanes. Love notes, “these data tell me we need to find ways to separate car traffic from bike traffic, and bike lanes are just one way to do that.”...
The bad news is that on roads without bike lanes, drivers had trouble sharing the road with cyclists, which at times violated a state law aimed at making cycling safer. In 2010, Maryland passed what is known as the “3-foot law,” which states that drivers must pass cyclists by three feet or more. The study authors found that one in six Baltimore drivers, or about 17 percent, violated the 3-foot law.
Researcher David Love, PhD, says that, “We knew the 3-foot law was not being followed. Now we have quantified the problem and provided a baseline from which the city can improve upon.”
The researchers found a 20 percent increase in motorist adherence to the 3-foot law for bike lane streets compared to standard streets. Violations became virtually non-existent in bike lanes. Love notes, “these data tell me we need to find ways to separate car traffic from bike traffic, and bike lanes are just one way to do that.”...
John
Last edited by John C. Ratliff; 06-05-13 at 10:50 PM. Reason: Add news article quote.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,877
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5874 Post(s)
Liked 2,723 Times
in
1,520 Posts
The survey results shouldn't surprise anybody.
The most sever accidents tend to happen at intersections. While there are instances of cyclists hit by passing cars, these are a smaller percentage of the total and tend not to be as sever as many of the intersection crashes.
Bike lanes which still have those same intersections therefore don't address the major cause of the most severe accidents, and so won't have a major impact on the total accident rate. Moreover, because most side-of-the-road lanes create confusing and conflicting flow patterns at intersections they can (and do) increase the accident rate there.
Imagine a 4 lane (2 in each direction) road as it approaches an intersection. It might have arrows in the right lane showing right and straight, and in the left lane straight ahead only (no left). Now imagine the same road, with the left land marked straight or right. Suddenly we have a problem with right turners from the left lane, crossing the path of straight ahead drivers to their right.
There's no way a road would ever have those markings, and traffic flow, yet that's exactly how the flow is with most along the road bike lanes.
The most sever accidents tend to happen at intersections. While there are instances of cyclists hit by passing cars, these are a smaller percentage of the total and tend not to be as sever as many of the intersection crashes.
Bike lanes which still have those same intersections therefore don't address the major cause of the most severe accidents, and so won't have a major impact on the total accident rate. Moreover, because most side-of-the-road lanes create confusing and conflicting flow patterns at intersections they can (and do) increase the accident rate there.
Imagine a 4 lane (2 in each direction) road as it approaches an intersection. It might have arrows in the right lane showing right and straight, and in the left lane straight ahead only (no left). Now imagine the same road, with the left land marked straight or right. Suddenly we have a problem with right turners from the left lane, crossing the path of straight ahead drivers to their right.
There's no way a road would ever have those markings, and traffic flow, yet that's exactly how the flow is with most along the road bike lanes.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#9
----
...Bike lanes which still have those same intersections therefore don't address the major cause of the most severe accidents, and so won't have a major impact on the total accident rate. Moreover, because most side-of-the-road lanes create confusing and conflicting flow patterns at intersections they can (and do) increase the accident rate there.
My understanding was that while come from behind accidents were less likely than accidents at intersections the severity of come from behind collisions was greater.
#1 Could you reference the study you are drawing these inferences from? I'd love to look at it.
# 2 Are you saying that bike lanes have a negligible impact on the accident rate in general and increase the rate of accidents at intersections? Or are you saying that bike lanes reduce accidents except at intersections?
Last edited by buzzman; 06-05-13 at 10:52 PM.
#10
24-Speed Machine
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Why am I not surprised by this.
This is one reason why I won't ride in bike lanes.
This is one reason why I won't ride in bike lanes.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,877
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5874 Post(s)
Liked 2,723 Times
in
1,520 Posts
I'm not sure if the OP article was conclusive regarding the accident rate. It seemed to only reference accident severity, which other posters have pointed out are two very different things. Your post seems to imply an increase in the overall accident rate in bike lanes due to an increase in accidents at intersections.
My understanding was that while come from behind accidents were less likely than accidents at intersections the severity of come from behind collisions was greater.
#1 Could you reference the study you are drawing these inferences from? I'd love to look at it.
# 2 Are you saying that bike lanes have a negligible impact on the accident rate in general and increase the rate of accidents at intersections? Or are you saying that bike lanes reduce accidents except at intersections?
My understanding was that while come from behind accidents were less likely than accidents at intersections the severity of come from behind collisions was greater.
#1 Could you reference the study you are drawing these inferences from? I'd love to look at it.
# 2 Are you saying that bike lanes have a negligible impact on the accident rate in general and increase the rate of accidents at intersections? Or are you saying that bike lanes reduce accidents except at intersections?
I'm sorry if I implied that bike lanes cause an overall increase in accidents, that wasn't intended. But, as the study referenced showed, they don't cause a decrease in the severity of accidents. I was pointing out that that was logical in that lanes don't address the issue of intersections.
As to whether hit from behind accidents on shared lanes cause more sever injuries than intersection accidents, that probably depends on where you're collecting data. On the open road, where car speed is high, and where drivers may be more likely to not expect bicycles hit from behind accidents tend to be at high speed, and the injuries severe. But in urban areas, drivers expect bicycles, and the speeds are lower, and the danger shifts from being hit while passed, to being hit at intersections.
My problem with bike infrastructure is that it's an expensive approach, and often doesn't address the problems effectively. I'm not opposed to some changes in the infrastructure, especially to painted bike lanes, which at the very least serve as reminders that cyclists will be on the road. IMO, a more cost effective solution is to focus on driver education, and changing driving habits of both cyclists and motorists. Unfortunately with the explosions of cell phones, texting, and the amount of non-automotive technology being fitted into cars today, we're headed in the wrong direction. (at least until collision avoidance systems become mainstream).
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 1,914
Bikes: Rans Stratus, Trek 1420, Rivendell Rambouillet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
FBinNY, please re-read post #7, as I have edited it with more information.
John
John
#13
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Originally Posted by study
Previous research has shown that bike lanes do reduce the number of bike-motor vehicle accidents that occur.
Last edited by Bekologist; 06-06-13 at 04:55 AM.
#14
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
My conclusions aren't based on a single study, but based on reading the available literature spanning 40 years. In many cases there are conflicts, probably based on how and where data is collected, and how it's interpreted.
I'm sorry if I implied that bike lanes cause an overall increase in accidents, that wasn't intended. But, as the study referenced showed, they don't cause a decrease in the severity of accidents. I was pointing out that that was logical in that lanes don't address the issue of intersections.
I'm sorry if I implied that bike lanes cause an overall increase in accidents, that wasn't intended. But, as the study referenced showed, they don't cause a decrease in the severity of accidents. I was pointing out that that was logical in that lanes don't address the issue of intersections.
BUT that's not a logical inference...bicycle networks that use bikelanes DO address the issue of intersections.
Bike lanes DON'T increase conflict at intersections, they are designed to, and have the strong potential to, mitigate conflict.
emphasized crossover zones, dashed or cessation of the bikelane stripe, guide striped thru intersections, turn restrictions, increasing awareness of bike traffic, all these are frequently associated with intersection bikelane design, and mitigate conflicts, not exacerbate them. Either the Oregon or the California models, both intersection treatments are designed to, and do, mitigate conflict.
#15
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
BUT that's not a logical inference...bicycle networks that use bikelanes DO address the issue of intersections.
Bike lanes DON'T increase conflict at intersections, they are designed to, and have the strong potential to, mitigate conflict.
emphasized crossover zones, dashed or cessation of the bikelane stripe, guide striped thru intersections, turn restrictions, increasing awareness of bike traffic, all these are frequently associated with intersection bikelane design, and mitigate conflicts, not exacerbate them. Either the Oregon or the California models, both intersection treatments are designed to, and do, mitigate conflict.
Bike lanes DON'T increase conflict at intersections, they are designed to, and have the strong potential to, mitigate conflict.
emphasized crossover zones, dashed or cessation of the bikelane stripe, guide striped thru intersections, turn restrictions, increasing awareness of bike traffic, all these are frequently associated with intersection bikelane design, and mitigate conflicts, not exacerbate them. Either the Oregon or the California models, both intersection treatments are designed to, and do, mitigate conflict.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've been commuting 7 years now - approx 4K commuting miles per year. I've seen an increase in the number of bike lanes (esp in philadelphia) over these years. In my experience, they are no safer than roads without bike lanes. In fact, in my experience, they might be more dangerous. While I haven't been tracking the statistics, I swear pedestrians and car doors are more likely to unexpectedly enter a bike lane than when there's no bike lane. I've had numerous encounters. It's as if they assume it's a safe buffer zone from traffic and it never occurs to them there might actually be a bike in the bike lane!
Last edited by ephin; 06-06-13 at 12:35 PM.
#17
incazzare.
...Why would anyone expect that a bike lane would reduce the severity of accidents?
__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
#18
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
some think that paint has magical powers
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#19
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13659 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
#21
incazzare.
Yeah, to me this seems like a red herring type study.
__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
#22
----
#23
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
King 5 brought this to light, probably because they don't like the bikelane plans for in front of their studio, i think its a separated, floating parking bike lane. Here's a screen shot of the bike lane in front of King 5 right now, the city has plans to beef up the bike facility on Dexter i believe....
https://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sour...12,261.62,,0,0
https://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sour...12,261.62,,0,0
#24
Banned
King 5 brought this to light, probably because they don't like the bikelane plans for in front of their studio, i think its a separated, floating parking bike lane. Here's a screen shot of the bike lane in front of King 5 right now, the city has plans to beef up the bike facility on Dexter i believe....
#25
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn
looks like.....
so, what do you recommend for Dexter in front of King 5? In front of King 5 the road is close to 100 feet wide.... it's 4 lanes, parking and bikelane, parking strip and sidewalk both sides now.
road diet with an even wider buffered bikelane, or cycletrack?
The city isn't going to give this road, one of the major N/S routes into downtown Seattle, back to motorists and force cyclists to 'take the lane' in front of the vehicle traffic.
modern NA cycletrack is in the city's next bike master plan, which is why KING 5 is promoting this view on bike lanes perhaps?
Last edited by Bekologist; 06-09-13 at 08:19 AM.