View Poll Results: What Are Your Helmet Wearing Habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
52
10.40%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
24
4.80%
I've always worn a helmet
208
41.60%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
126
25.20%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
90
18.00%
Voters: 500. You may not vote on this poll
The Helmet Thread 2
#1626
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
In this thread, the issue is whether there's a positive overall benefit.
No, I'm not criticize the article. I'm more criticizing the reference of it as a a suggestion that wearing helmets is a bad idea.
The only thing we can say from that article is that helmets aren't perfect.
The particular referenced article appears to conclude that helmets help in the "majority" of "typical linear impacts" while not causing an increase in rotational injuries except in low speed collisions where the increase is "marginal".
I doubt it's saying people shouldn't wear helmets.
Overall, it was concluded that for the majority of cases considered, the helmet can provide life saving protection during typical linear impacts and, in addition, the typical level of rotational acceleration observed using a helmeted headform would generally be no more injurious than expected for a bare human head. However, in both low speed linear impacts and the most severe oblique cases, linear and rotational accelerations may increase to levels corresponding to injury severities as high as AIS 2 or 3, at which a marginal increase (up to 1 AIS interval) in injury outcome may be expected for a helmeted head.
The particular article appears to say "no contribution in high speed collisions and a marginal contribution in low speed collisions offset by life saving protection high speed collisions".
Last edited by njkayaker; 10-08-15 at 01:16 PM.
#1627
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,859
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12784 Post(s)
Liked 7,697 Times
in
4,086 Posts
To charge at all seems underhanded. Kind of like a mechanic already having a car on a lift and pointing out work that needs to happen to someone they know will just pay. You should just give the helmet for free (included in the rental), but charge for replacement if they don't bring it back.
Nice rundown of different shares. Great info!
Twin Cities here (St Paul & Minneapolis), so Nice Ride is our local implementation of a bike share program, and it has been very successful. How successful? So successful that the national park (Mississippi National River and Recreation Area - MNRRA) and its non-profit volunteer wing Mississippi River Fund, soon to be renamed as Mississippi Park Connection (I think that's it) is in the final stages of starting a canoe rental/sharing program. You'd be able to rent a canoe, get out at a location, check your canoe in and then transfer to a Nice Ride bike to carry on. How cool is that?!?!
Nice Ride does not require helmet usage, but does suggest it
Nice rundown of different shares. Great info!
Twin Cities here (St Paul & Minneapolis), so Nice Ride is our local implementation of a bike share program, and it has been very successful. How successful? So successful that the national park (Mississippi National River and Recreation Area - MNRRA) and its non-profit volunteer wing Mississippi River Fund, soon to be renamed as Mississippi Park Connection (I think that's it) is in the final stages of starting a canoe rental/sharing program. You'd be able to rent a canoe, get out at a location, check your canoe in and then transfer to a Nice Ride bike to carry on. How cool is that?!?!
Nice Ride does not require helmet usage, but does suggest it
#1628
Senior Member
People have been killed/injured by seatbelts/airbags would you take them out of your car? - the issue is whether helmets increase the risk of rotational injury in some situations, so that's a poor comparison. Better is, would you put small children in front of airbags?
As for practicing falling, I wouldn't any more, maybe 30 years ago I would have considered it. - just age should not prevent someone from learning falls in a dojo. My question is, those who have trained and know how, what differences in technique did they find?
As for practicing falling, I wouldn't any more, maybe 30 years ago I would have considered it. - just age should not prevent someone from learning falls in a dojo. My question is, those who have trained and know how, what differences in technique did they find?
#1629
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I guess my real question should have been "even tho a helmet can provide life saving protection overall, the decision not to wear one because of a non perfect score seems not logical to me, and that alone is not sufficient reason to forgo all the other benefits of wearing a helmet" No?
This concern is based almost entirely on the concussion portion of traumatic brain injury. You can stipulate that helmets can save you of most of the abrasion injuries, and contusions and other effects of less severe impacts, and I doubt that you'd get much argument over that. It's reasonable to decide to wear a helmet on the strength of that alone, and also reasonable to decide that preventing those injuries alone is insufficient reason to justify wearing one.
But concussions are serious concerns, and it's pretty startling to learn but solid that the most likely cause of concussion is rotational force, not linear impact. It's also pretty startling that helmets provide little or no defense against those rotational forces (although more recent helmets improve on this), and possibly, no protection against a large range of the larger linear forces that are required in order to cause a concussion.
So there IS a range, maybe, where the maximum impact that the helmet can absorb and the minimum possible impact that can cause a concussion overlaps and hence the helmet might save a concussion. Even that is disputed, and if true is a narrow range. So that line of thought basically has it that cycling helmets offer no protection, or at best little protection, against concussions. But they might increase the chances of a rotational injury.
And that seems to be the main reason people say it's worthless to wear one, and may even be worse for you if you do wear one...
#1630
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
If you have to put a child in the front seat having an airbag, please take additional cautions. Even with additional precautions there is an increased risk to the child, no matter how "correctly" you use it.
Speaking of "correct" use of safety equipment, back to the helmet. Furthering the analogy, "misuse" of the helmet in my opinion would be allowing it to unnecessarily contact the ground. So I'll refresh my question, to anyone who has relevant experience or specific knowledge: if you've had formal training in rolls and break-falls, have you found the helmet to be an impediment in the technique?
#1631
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
Bicycle falls aren't very much like those things.
It would be a use that it wasn't designed for (a "misuse"). If you have any choice, you wouldn't put a child in the front seat (even without an airbag). Also based on "sound medical knowledge and case studies".
Last edited by njkayaker; 10-08-15 at 04:47 PM.
#1632
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Why do you say that? I've used those things in slip and falls, high speed motorcycle accidents - and bicycle falls. As far as I can tell bicycle falls are exactly like those things. Even a low-side, if you're quick enough.
#1633
Padawan
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 838
Bikes: Orbea Mitis Dama, Bridgestone Sirius, Cranbrook Cruiser, Cheap Mountain Bike
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
^^^ I just love this. I really really really do. No really.
I wear my helmet because I like my noggin and would like to avoid a concussion if possible. I realize it may not save my noggin in worse case scenario, but for me why not wear it. It's purple and it's cute dangit!
I don't think they should be forced on anyone that decides not to wear them though.
I wear my helmet because I like my noggin and would like to avoid a concussion if possible. I realize it may not save my noggin in worse case scenario, but for me why not wear it. It's purple and it's cute dangit!
I don't think they should be forced on anyone that decides not to wear them though.
#1634
Senior Member
[QUOTE=rydabent;18218299isnt some protection better than no protection? Since wearing a helmet is really no burden at all, why not wear one?[/QUOTE]
Still waiting for our friend to explain why you don't wear helmet during other activities since it's "no burden at all".
Still waiting for our friend to explain why you don't wear helmet during other activities since it's "no burden at all".
#1635
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
Martial art/gymnastic falls are routine. Bicycle falls are not.
If you are going to spend time practicing bicycle safety, it would likely be vastly less risky and more beneficial to practice avoiding falls.
#1637
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,978
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
1,047 Posts
So what? Do you wear your Colorado pickup when you walk up or down stairs, take a shower, or venture outside the friendly confines of your living room couch? Would not your precious "no burden at all" helmet offer additional "protection" even when driving your air bag equipped Colorado pickup? If you do not wear your helmet at these times/all the time for any additional protection that you believe it offers, why not, since it is "no burden at all"?
#1638
Senior Member
Yet in spite of safety advances, motor vehicle crashes are still the leading cause of traumatic brain injury, by far. Implementation of such safety devices has resulted only in very modest decreases in head injury due to motor vehicle crashes. If a helmet has to potential to reduce your chances or severity of head injury in case of a crash, why wouldn't you wear one in your truck?
#1639
Senior Member
As mentioned before people don't wear helmets for most things because they do other things to reduce the risk... Like walking on the sidewalk not the road, crossing at a crosswalk not the middle of the road... Like holding onto a banister while walking down/up steps... Like having handholds in showers... Like having airbags/seatbelts in vehicles, like almost everything in life most people do, do things to reduce whatever the risk may be... Oh, Like having mad cycling skills and never crashing...
#1640
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,978
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
1,047 Posts
So what? Those "other things" only reduce the risk for "most things", not eliminate it; wearing a "no burden helmet" in conjunction with the "other things" involved with getting off the living room couch might reduce the risk even more. So why not?
#1641
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
A slow speed low-side fall might be similar (I was going to mention that).
Martial art/gymnastic falls are routine. Bicycle falls are not.
If you are going to spend time practicing bicycle safety, it would likely be vastly less risky and more beneficial to practice avoiding falls.
Martial art/gymnastic falls are routine. Bicycle falls are not.
If you are going to spend time practicing bicycle safety, it would likely be vastly less risky and more beneficial to practice avoiding falls.
Avoiding falls is your first line of defense. That's not always possible, and when it does happen we are vastly better off knowing how. I sometimes get the sense that people who are dismissive of those skills don't really understand what I'm talking about, or they just don't believe that it's possible. Wearing a helmet is the last line of defense, when your training cannot prevent a head impact.
#1642
Senior Member
As mentioned before people don't wear helmets for most things because they do other things to reduce the risk... Like walking on the sidewalk not the road, crossing at a crosswalk not the middle of the road... Like holding onto a banister while walking down/up steps... Like having handholds in showers... Like having airbags/seatbelts in vehicles, like almost everything in life most people do, do things to reduce whatever the risk may be... Oh, Like having mad cycling skills and never crashing...
Last edited by vol; 10-09-15 at 11:48 AM.
#1643
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Even with seat belts and air bags, the chances of a head injury during a car accident are comparable to the chances of head injury in a bike crash. About three times less, but still that's comparable.
ER stats that I've seen, the most common cause of head injury is the simple slip and fall. The majority of those falls happened to someone walking on a sidewalk, but those injured are seldom wearing a helmet. Perceived risk for different activities don't seem to follow reality.
#1644
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
ER stats that I've seen, the most common cause of head injury is the simple slip and fall. The majority of those falls happened to someone walking on a sidewalk, but those injured are seldom wearing a helmet. Perceived risk for different activities don't seem to follow reality.
Advice from people who know what they are talking about to prevent TBI in older adults from falls:
- Install handrails in bathrooms
- Nonslip mats in bathtub or shower
- Remove area rugs
- Install to-code handrails on (both sides) of stairs
- Improve lighting in high risk fall areas
- Keep floors and stairs free of clutter
- Vision checkups
- Regular exercise
Advice for people at risk of falls on sidewalks?
- Canes
- Walkers
You know who recommends helmets for grandma and grandpa?
Anti-helmet zealots and ?
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 10-09-15 at 12:26 PM.
#1645
Senior Member
I inferred it from his/her words "As mentioned before people don't wear helmets for most things because they do other things to reduce the risk". That seems to imply people wear helmet while cycling because they don't do other things to reduce the risk.
#1646
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,978
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
1,047 Posts
Only in sarcastic response to the hypocritical helmet zealots like rydabent. Why do the nanny/zealots proselytizing for reducing any cycling risk no matter how slight or unlikely with a "no burden at all helmet", not recommend its use in every other situation where such "no burden" devices might be of use. One word answer, take your pick, ignorance or hypocrisy.