Shimano Octalink range
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Shimano Octalink range
Hi,
I need to replace an Octalink bottom bracket but I'm a bit confused by the ranges. I can't see how an ES51 differs from an ES300 in the same size but has a different price? Is the 300 newer than the 51? or not as good quality?
thanks for any help.
I need to replace an Octalink bottom bracket but I'm a bit confused by the ranges. I can't see how an ES51 differs from an ES300 in the same size but has a different price? Is the 300 newer than the 51? or not as good quality?
thanks for any help.
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,843
Likes: 17
From: Central PA
Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix
ES51 costs more than ES300 right? ES51 is a higher end component.
#3
Keepin it Wheel




Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,969
Likes: 5,255
From: San Diego
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
likely the more expensive one has more expensive bearings, lighter metal parts that are maybe contoured to retain stiffness, etc. If you're still using octalink, I think that shows you're not a latest/greatest/lightest/fastest weight weenie, so you might as well get the cheaper one.
#4
Senior Member


Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,151
Likes: 887
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
The 300 will work fine and as said be some what heavier, however as also said it will have lower quality bearing/seals and so not be as robust or have as long a life. As you are still riding Octalink you may be one of us who keeps old bike moving and would be better off with a BB that will have a longer life. Some day soon Octalinks will be very hard to find ($), the first version is getting that way now, fortunately you are looking for V2.
#5
Keepin it Wheel




Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,969
Likes: 5,255
From: San Diego
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
The 300 will work fine and as said be some what heavier, however as also said it will have lower quality bearing/seals and so not be as robust or have as long a life. As you are still riding Octalink you may be one of us who keeps old bike moving and would be better off with a BB that will have a longer life. Some day soon Octalinks will be very hard to find ($), the first version is getting that way now, fortunately you are looking for V2.
I have a nice old Tom Ritchey crankset that a friend gave me, along with a BB that is too long (115 I think), puts my chainline out too far by 2 or 3 cogs. Someday when I care, I'll snatch up a 109.5 and put it on my commuter.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Road (V-1) Octalinks were made in two lengths, 109.5 mm for double cranks and 118.5 mm for triples. It's likely you have the 118.5 mm. I believe there was a 112 mm V-1 also but it was intended for the XTR MTB crank





