Front Derailleur problem on 3x7
#1
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Bikes: Nothing a Bike Weenie would ride.
Front Derailleur problem on 3x7
I converted a mountain bike to a hybrid and installed a 52 42 30 road crank in place of the 48 38 28 MTB crank. The problem is I was unable to find an affordable top pull road derailleur to fit the 52 ring. So I ended up with a Diore XT mtb top pull derailleur whose spec lists the big ring limit as 48 teeth.
So what? you say...
Its hard to get the MTB derailleur to work with the bigger rings. The curve is wrong, so it has to ride a little higher than it should (about 2mm), and with the greater difference in ring sizes from small to large, the chain drags over the tail of the derailleur in low gear. When on the big ring, the chain rubs the sides of the derailleur when on 1, and 2 on the freewheel. Very annoying.
I finally got the chain not to rub the front derailleur in 2 or 3 by making it slightly askew over the crankset (so little you have to stare hard to see it). But in 1 the chain still drags over the flat part of the tail because the derailleur is just not as long as a road (iow it does not go low enough to clear the chain). It does shift just fine. No problems with FD shifts at all.
Is there a road (or XC) derailleur for a 52 T triple crankset that is top pull and costs less than $50?
Should I look for a larger ring for 1, say a 32 or 35 so it wont drag over the tail?
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
So what? you say...
Its hard to get the MTB derailleur to work with the bigger rings. The curve is wrong, so it has to ride a little higher than it should (about 2mm), and with the greater difference in ring sizes from small to large, the chain drags over the tail of the derailleur in low gear. When on the big ring, the chain rubs the sides of the derailleur when on 1, and 2 on the freewheel. Very annoying.
I finally got the chain not to rub the front derailleur in 2 or 3 by making it slightly askew over the crankset (so little you have to stare hard to see it). But in 1 the chain still drags over the flat part of the tail because the derailleur is just not as long as a road (iow it does not go low enough to clear the chain). It does shift just fine. No problems with FD shifts at all.
Is there a road (or XC) derailleur for a 52 T triple crankset that is top pull and costs less than $50?
Should I look for a larger ring for 1, say a 32 or 35 so it wont drag over the tail?
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Last edited by Mark42; 08-04-17 at 07:25 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 470
Likes: 15
From: Singapore
Bikes: Voodoo Hoodoo, Linus Libertine
How many teeth are your cassette/freewheel?
What are you trying to achieve by going to 30-42-52? I mean of course you are going for higher gearing, but how many gear inch is your top gear?
I assume you are not concerned with your low gear since you suggested going bigger.
44/12 with 27 inch (700c with tires) wheel yields 99 gear inch.
44/11 with 27 inch (700c with tires) wheel yields 108 gear inch.
42/11 with 27 inch (700c with tires) wheel yields 103 gear inch.
What are you trying to achieve by going to 30-42-52? I mean of course you are going for higher gearing, but how many gear inch is your top gear?
I assume you are not concerned with your low gear since you suggested going bigger.
44/12 with 27 inch (700c with tires) wheel yields 99 gear inch.
44/11 with 27 inch (700c with tires) wheel yields 108 gear inch.
42/11 with 27 inch (700c with tires) wheel yields 103 gear inch.
Last edited by hermanchauw; 08-01-17 at 11:29 PM.
#3
Senior Member


Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
IMO your best option might be to go with a bottom pull road triple (assuming it's compatible with the lever cable pull ratio). Reversing the cable from top pull to bottom pull is easy enough using a clamp-on pulley made for the purpose, or as I do, looping the cable under either chainstay.
If looping the stay you can use a piece of teflon tubing, or as I do, a strip of metallic tape, ir muffler tape. The cable will find the shortest path on it's own and stay there.
If looping the stay you can use a piece of teflon tubing, or as I do, a strip of metallic tape, ir muffler tape. The cable will find the shortest path on it's own and stay there.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#5
Really Old Senior Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,629
Likes: 1,882
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3
Mountain shifters have a different amount of cable pull on the FRONT der than road shifters.
So, if you still have the old shifters, that "might" be a contributing factor.
You may also have better luck with one of the "A" FDERS (Altus etc.) designed for a few less cogs. They aren't quite as narrow.
7 speed chain is wide compared to a 10 speed FDER and pretty much asking for chain rub.
IF I were attempting to do the same, I'd use an FD-C102.
So, if you still have the old shifters, that "might" be a contributing factor.
You may also have better luck with one of the "A" FDERS (Altus etc.) designed for a few less cogs. They aren't quite as narrow.
7 speed chain is wide compared to a 10 speed FDER and pretty much asking for chain rub.
IF I were attempting to do the same, I'd use an FD-C102.
Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 08-02-17 at 03:09 PM.
#7
Mechanic/Tourist
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,522
Likes: 12
From: Syracuse, NY
Bikes: 2008 Novara Randonee - love it. Previous bikes:Motobecane Mirage, 1972 Moto Grand Jubilee (my fave), Jackson Rake 16, 1983 C'dale ST500.
+1 It was a mistake going up to a 52 tooth. Even a 52-12 is of minimal use on a full road bike, let alone a hybrid. A 52-11 is just absurd. You'd have to be going 28 mph to even justify shifting into that gear, and that's at only 75rpm. There are pro riders that "only" have a high gear of 50-12.
Last edited by cny-bikeman; 08-03-17 at 06:01 AM.
#8
Is your derailleur designed for 7-speed? I'm not sure how far back XT goes but I can recall 7-speed DX derailleurs. If you are using a 9-speed or 10-speed derailleur the cage is slightly narrower and can result in rub problems which can be worse if your shifters don't have a trim feature.
Could you tell us if you have a freewheel or freehub and what its range is? That would help with specific recommendations.
Could you tell us if you have a freewheel or freehub and what its range is? That would help with specific recommendations.
#9
Full Member
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 490
Likes: 44
From: SoCal
Bikes: 2014 Bruce Gordon Rock&Road, 1995 Santana Visa Tandem, 1990 Trek 520, 2012 Surly LHT
I ran an old Shimano XT FD-M735 on a Santana tandem fitted with 52/44/28 tooth chainrings and bar end shifters (i.e., the front shifter is friction). That front derailleur was designed for 3x7 MTB, max 48 tooth large ring. However, it is unusual in that it could handle a 26 tooth difference between the small and large chainring; most triple front derailleurs can only handle 20 tooth difference. What I found was setup was critical. Usually the outer cage is set parallel with the large chainring. But you will need to twist yours to minimize chain rub; try turning the back of the cage further inwards. Of course, with indexed MTB shifters, you have limited trim so you may always have chain rub in some combinations. In which case you are stuck and may just not be able to use all the combinations. Seems like you would want to avoid the large chainring small cog anyway. Good luck.
#10
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
I run friction shifters so there is adjustments done with every shift.
STI as I see It, goes ker-thunk to a spot, then depends on the complex cage shapes to not scrape the chain until you hit cross chain gear combos.
....
STI as I see It, goes ker-thunk to a spot, then depends on the complex cage shapes to not scrape the chain until you hit cross chain gear combos.
....
#11
Senior Member

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,103
Likes: 96
From: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)
Nearly every Shimano STI lever ever made (and every modern one) has built in trimming functionality. Not as much leeway as you have with friction but enough to allow one to cross-chain at will with minimal or no noise. Of course, one has to set it up correctly to work correctly.
#12
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Bikes: Nothing a Bike Weenie would ride.
The freewheel is 14-28. The 52 T gets me to a comfortable cadence on the flats. The shifters are for MTB, the Derailleurs are for MTB, so I'm sure things are matched. Measured the new crank ring spacing, its the same as the MTB crank it replaced. Maybe I need a thinner chain. Its a KMC X8.99 Chain. And the rear tire is a 26 x 2.185.
Here are the calc results for each crank.
Gear Inches MTB. Big ring is 48T

Cadence at Speed MTB

Gear Inchs Road big ring is 52

Cadence at speed Road
Here are the calc results for each crank.
Gear Inches MTB. Big ring is 48T
Cadence at Speed MTB
Gear Inchs Road big ring is 52
Cadence at speed Road
Last edited by Mark42; 08-04-17 at 02:30 PM.
#13
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Bikes: Nothing a Bike Weenie would ride.
How many teeth are your cassette/freewheel?
What are you trying to achieve by going to 30-42-52? I mean of course you are going for higher gearing, but how many gear inch is your top gear?
I assume you are not concerned with your low gear since you suggested going bigger.
44/12 with 27 inch (700c with tires) wheel yields 99 gear inch.
44/11 with 27 inch (700c with tires) wheel yields 108 gear inch.
42/11 with 27 inch (700c with tires) wheel yields 103 gear inch.
What are you trying to achieve by going to 30-42-52? I mean of course you are going for higher gearing, but how many gear inch is your top gear?
I assume you are not concerned with your low gear since you suggested going bigger.
44/12 with 27 inch (700c with tires) wheel yields 99 gear inch.
44/11 with 27 inch (700c with tires) wheel yields 108 gear inch.
42/11 with 27 inch (700c with tires) wheel yields 103 gear inch.
#14
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 70
#15
Senior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 17
From: Upstate NY
Bikes: Bianchi San Mateo and a few others
In addition, while there are top pull road derailleurs for cyclocross bikes, I'm not aware of any that have a shaped cage for a triple. (If the derailleur has a big enough swing and a long enough cage, you may be able to make a double front derailleur work.)
#16
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Bikes: Nothing a Bike Weenie would ride.
Shimano indexed road and mountain front derailleurs use a different cable pull ratio, and that's gonna be a problem for you: MTB derailleurs don't exist with proper cage radius for a 52-tooth chainring. Road derailleurs do, but they won't have the correct cable pull to index with your MTB shifters.
In addition, while there are top pull road derailleurs for cyclocross bikes, I'm not aware of any that have a shaped cage for a triple. (If the derailleur has a big enough swing and a long enough cage, you may be able to make a double front derailleur work.)
In addition, while there are top pull road derailleurs for cyclocross bikes, I'm not aware of any that have a shaped cage for a triple. (If the derailleur has a big enough swing and a long enough cage, you may be able to make a double front derailleur work.)
I realized I had checked the wrong crank to get the MTB tooth counts. I have updated the calcs above to reflect the MTB is 28,38,48T. With the MTB crank, I felt I was pedling too fast at my common flats speeds of 10 to 15 mph. This 52T slows the cadence down a few rotations and I feel about the same as when riding my old 2x5 road bike.
The change in Gear Inches (48 vs 52 with 14 cog) is 90.7 to 97.42. Change in Cadence for 10 & 15mph is 37,56 to 35,52. Guess that is not a really big change, but it sure does make my 59 yr old knees feel better.
Funny thing is if you read Shimano Derailleur setup tech document, it says that rubbing is normal when at the extreme gears. So, seeing as rings 2 and 3 are running quiet, and its only ring 1 that drags the chain off the tail of the cage, I'll look into modifying the cage to be longer .
Last edited by Mark42; 08-04-17 at 02:50 PM.
#17
Senior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 17
From: Upstate NY
Bikes: Bianchi San Mateo and a few others
Chainring spacing may be the same, but the geometry (lever/arm length) of road and MTB derailleurs isn't. It takes a slightly different amount of cable pull to move road and MTB front derailleurs the same distance, hence shifter/derailleur incompatibility between the two product lineups. But hey, I'm not one to argue with results.
#18
Newbie
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
The spacing between the rings on the road crank is the same as the MTB crank. 7mm. Besides, the problem is not shifting, the problem is rubbing from small rear cog to large rear cog, and not enough drop to low on the crank. It shifts just fine. Now medium and high rings work fine, just the low ring drags.
I realized I had checked the wrong crank to get the MTB tooth counts. I have updated the calcs above to reflect the MTB is 28,38,48T. With the MTB crank, I felt I was pedling too fast at my common flats speeds of 10 to 15 mph. This 52T slows the cadence down a few rotations and I feel about the same as when riding my old 2x5 road bike.
The change in Gear Inches (48 vs 52 with 14 cog) is 90.7 to 97.42. Change in Cadence for 10 & 15mph is 37,56 to 35,52. Guess that is not a really big change, but it sure does make my 59 yr old knees feel better.
Funny thing is if you read Shimano Derailleur setup tech document, it says that rubbing is normal when at the extreme gears. So, seeing as rings 2 and 3 are running quiet, and its only ring 1 that drags the chain off the tail of the cage, I'll look into modifying the cage to be longer .
I realized I had checked the wrong crank to get the MTB tooth counts. I have updated the calcs above to reflect the MTB is 28,38,48T. With the MTB crank, I felt I was pedling too fast at my common flats speeds of 10 to 15 mph. This 52T slows the cadence down a few rotations and I feel about the same as when riding my old 2x5 road bike.
The change in Gear Inches (48 vs 52 with 14 cog) is 90.7 to 97.42. Change in Cadence for 10 & 15mph is 37,56 to 35,52. Guess that is not a really big change, but it sure does make my 59 yr old knees feel better.
Funny thing is if you read Shimano Derailleur setup tech document, it says that rubbing is normal when at the extreme gears. So, seeing as rings 2 and 3 are running quiet, and its only ring 1 that drags the chain off the tail of the cage, I'll look into modifying the cage to be longer .
Shimano MF-HG37 7-Speed Tourney Freewheel
#19
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Bikes: Nothing a Bike Weenie would ride.
If you only wanted to change the gear inches in your top gear from 90 to 97, you could have just replaced your 14-28t freewheel with a 13-28t.
Shimano MF-HG37 7-Speed Tourney Freewheel
Shimano MF-HG37 7-Speed Tourney Freewheel
You can accept that explanation or this one: DOH!
#20
Really Old Senior Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,629
Likes: 1,882
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3
Pedaling that slow would kill me on about 3 counts.
I went to 165mm cranks and LOW gears and my knees no longer have chronic pain.
I spin 80-85 and have far more endurance than trying to mash at 60, which was near my max with 175mm cranks. (ROM issue with the knee and my foot would be coming off the pedal @ 12 o'clock @ 63 RPM.
#21
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Bikes: Nothing a Bike Weenie would ride.
I've got 10 years on you + 2 bad knees, 1 bad ankle, emphysema and a bad back.
Pedaling that slow would kill me on about 3 counts.
I went to 165mm cranks and LOW gears and my knees no longer have chronic pain.
I spin 80-85 and have far more endurance than trying to mash at 60, which was near my max with 175mm cranks. (ROM issue with the knee and my foot would be coming off the pedal @ 12 o'clock @ 63 RPM.
Pedaling that slow would kill me on about 3 counts.
I went to 165mm cranks and LOW gears and my knees no longer have chronic pain.
I spin 80-85 and have far more endurance than trying to mash at 60, which was near my max with 175mm cranks. (ROM issue with the knee and my foot would be coming off the pedal @ 12 o'clock @ 63 RPM.
#22
Really Old Senior Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,629
Likes: 1,882
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3
Ouch! I'm glad you found the right setting for your knees, etc. I wonder why the differences in our preferences. I was at the surgeons office the other day for a simple follow up exam. He said casually that my knees were low on fluids. Like they are a car. Said next visit hell inject some more lubricant. My knees don't like rapid motion. And my right ankle is nearly fused, I have about 5 or 7 degrees of vertical motion in my ankle. Just enough to walk normal, but running I look like I have a stick up my ass. Thank you mr drunk driver for all my physical problems. grrrrr.
Basically (compared to you) I spin 4/3 faster with 3/4 the force to get the same work done. (or so when you are "maxed") I can also go out and ride an hour instead of about 45 seconds.
I broke my tib & fib some years back and now have a "nail" (actual medical term that we would call a rod).
Pounding the nail in (they don't come from the bottom) didn't mess up my knee a bit except for the scar. It was already messed up. However, my ankle, which "should" have been unaffected, feels like all my tendons were shortened a bit. They get really pissed when I try to stretch them.
The other pic is my hybrid crank with a gawdawful looking, but functional FDER and a 22-32-36. I run either 12-23 or 13-25 Cassettes, depending on my conditioning. Note The Tourney FDER shifting a 3X9.
Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 08-04-17 at 07:52 PM.
#23
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Bikes: Nothing a Bike Weenie would ride.
Wanted to give an update on the situation. Just to recap: Have MTB shifters, deraillerus and installed a road bike size tripple crank. Finally after about a solid hour of riding with my tool pouch and stopping and adjusting every hundred yards or so, everything is working really great. Except for when in low front gear the derailleur still rubs the chain a bit when in the high gears out back. Otherwise I am very happy that second and third front chainrings run very silent and shift perfectly. Persistence pays off.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Don in Austin
Bicycle Mechanics
14
09-08-11 10:29 PM






