Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

First time chain replacement

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

First time chain replacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-26 | 05:19 PM
  #76  
grumpus's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 3,799
Likes: 1,750
Originally Posted by Iride01
Not all the time. But most of the time it does. I have had a few things show in the preview that were covered with splats in the actual post.

I'm not sure if that is tied to whether or not I'm in the advanced editor, the reply to or quick reply box.
There's an advanced editor?
grumpus is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-26 | 05:31 PM
  #77  
Iride01's Avatar
Facts just confuse people
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 19,245
Likes: 7,015
From: Mississippi

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

That's what they call it. But it looks pretty much the same to me. Perhaps there was a difference BITD when the forum was younger. Maybe some of the long time members will know. Although sometimes there are options to delete your entire reply in the advanced. Though the questions and checkboxes you have to go through to actually delete a reply can be thwart that effort if one just hits the button without answering them. That's saved my but a times being able to do that.

Though I also suspect you may have meant that comment more as humorous sarcasm! <grin>

Last edited by Iride01; 02-27-26 at 05:36 PM.
Iride01 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-26 | 06:02 PM
  #78  
grumpus's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 3,799
Likes: 1,750
Originally Posted by Iride01
Though I also suspect you may have meant that comment more as humorous sarcasm! <grin>
Nah, "I love using edlin" is sarcastic humour(?) about editors, or "emacs is so clearly superior to vi".
grumpus is offline  
Reply
Old 03-01-26 | 04:38 PM
  #79  
bikerbob38's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 59
Likes: 35
From: Washington, DC metro area

Bikes: Trek Verve 3 Hybrid, Brompton C Explorer, six-speed; had a Serotta titanium Hors Categorie once

Just a wrap-up posting to note that since the old chain ran smoothly and passed the large/large and small/small test, what I finally did was to lay the new and old chains beside one another, link by link. This led me to remove only one link from the new chain and after putting it back on the bike, it works just fine and the position of the derailleur in both configurations looks perfect to me.

Thanks for everyone's patience and for all the great tips and links to relevant sites.
bikerbob38 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-26 | 12:54 PM
  #80  
bikerbob38's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 59
Likes: 35
From: Washington, DC metro area

Bikes: Trek Verve 3 Hybrid, Brompton C Explorer, six-speed; had a Serotta titanium Hors Categorie once

Originally Posted by Iride01
The chain on my previous 11 speed bike only lasted about 4000 miles. I partly credit the longer life of my new bikes chain to the fact I have Di2 and have set it so that I can never shift to the two rear sprockets with the most teeth if I'm in the big ring. It'll shift to the small ring automatically if lower ratios are needed. Others don't believe that helps. But it's the only thing different, except for the bike and maybe 5 less pounds of weight. On the other bike, I did tend to use the big big combo a lot instead of shifting to the same ratio I could get in the small ring.

I don't remember what your bike is. But if it's 1x, then you have no choice. However if it's 2x or 3x, I'd encourage you to never use the big big combos since there are close to the same ratios with another combination of middle or small front ring and the rear sprockets that will keep your chain line straighter. If it's a e-bike, I'd further encourage you not to accelerate from a stop in a high ratio gear. Even if the motor seems to handle it. That is just putting undue strain on the chain. More strain, more wear. Simple as that. And you can probably accelerate just as fast in a lower ratio if you can pedal a faster rpm.

All IMO, and I'm probably in a minority or even solely of that opinion.
I am always aware of what gear I am in and. never cross-chain.
bikerbob38 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-26 | 01:06 PM
  #81  
AndreyT's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 691
Likes: 125
From: CA
Originally Posted by Iride01
However if it's 2x or 3x, I'd encourage you to never use the big big combos since there are close to the same ratios with another combination of middle or small front ring and the rear sprockets that will keep your chain line straighter. If it's a e-bike, I'd further encourage you not to accelerate from a stop in a high ratio gear. Even if the motor seems to handle it. That is just putting undue strain on the chain.
First part of the above quote just discards the last couple of decades of bicycle drivetrain development: the Holy Grail of big-big. The entire drivetrain design in 2000s was focused on one single purpose: enabling big-big and what comes with it, e.g. reduced sifting, increased efficiency, reduced chainring-sprocket wear, reduced chain strain.

Second part of the above quote actually contradicts the first: all other thigs being equal it is specifically big-big that puts less strain on the chain (than the equivalent small-biggersmaller combination).

Last edited by AndreyT; 03-05-26 at 04:56 PM.
AndreyT is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-26 | 01:47 PM
  #82  
bikerbob38's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 59
Likes: 35
From: Washington, DC metro area

Bikes: Trek Verve 3 Hybrid, Brompton C Explorer, six-speed; had a Serotta titanium Hors Categorie once

Originally Posted by AndreyT
First part of the above quote just discards the last couple of decades of bicycle drivetrain development: the Holy Grail of big-big. The entire drivetrain design in 2000s was focused on one single purpose: enabling big-big and what comes with it, e.g. reduced sifting, increased efficiency, reduced chainring-sprocket wear, reduced chain strain.

Second part of the above quote actually contradicts the first: all other thigs being equal it is specifically big-big that puts less strain on the chain (than the equivalent small-bigger combination).
While I do not question what you say, I suspect in regard to my $900 Trek, whatever developments have occurred to enable safe cross chaining, it is not going to be seen on anything other than top-level road bikes.
bikerbob38 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-26 | 02:03 PM
  #83  
maddog34's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 7,310
Likes: 3,187
From: NW Oregon

Bikes: 1982 Trek 930R Custom, '91 Diamondback Ascent w/ XT, XTR updates, Fuji Team Pro CF road flyer, Specialized Sirrus Gravel Convert, '09 Comencal Meta 5.5 XC, '02 Marin MBX500, '84 Gitane Criterium bike

Originally Posted by AndreyT
First part of the above quote just discards the last couple of decades of bicycle drivetrain development: the Holy Grail of big-big. The entire drivetrain design in 2000s was focused on one single purpose: enabling big-big and what comes with it, e.g. reduced sifting, increased efficiency, reduced chainring-sprocket wear, reduced chain strain.

Second part of the above quote actually contradicts the first: all other thigs being equal it is specifically big-big that puts less strain on the chain (than the equivalent small-bigger combination).
hogwash...
the recent engineering changes revolved around improved shift speed, shifting under load, and increasing available wrap to allow ever-wider gearing choices..
that improved tech. always filters down to the lower ranked parts groups, over time.
those changes began well over a decade before your proposed time.
and sometimes, the major improvements get publicly tested on lesser groups, like Shimano's Mega-Range Tourney and Altus groups.
maddog34 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-26 | 04:10 PM
  #84  
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
Really Old Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 1,856
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Originally Posted by AndreyT
...Second part of the above quote actually contradicts the first: all other thigs being equal it is specifically big-big that puts less strain on the chain (than the equivalent small-bigger combination).
You don't have a bigger if you are already on big:big.
Bill Kapaun is online now  
Reply
Old 03-05-26 | 05:04 PM
  #85  
AndreyT's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 691
Likes: 125
From: CA
Originally Posted by bikerbob38
While I do not question what you say, I suspect in regard to my $900 Trek, whatever developments have occurred to enable safe cross chaining, it is not going to be seen on anything other than top-level road bikes.
No, it is mostly about the chain. The moment 9 speed comes into the picture, the "big-big concerns" become a thing of the past.

As for "top-level road bikes", it is actually the other way around: top-level road bikes often have shorter chainstays (e.g. rear wheel pushed forward under the seat), meaning that they experience much larger chain skew in big-big configuration. But even these bicycles today have no issues whatsoever with big-big. Meanwhile, your Verve 3 is not even remotely like that - being a "comfort" bike, it has relatively long chainstays. For this bike big-big would not be an issue even if you put some ancient groupset with some ancient chain on it.

Every time you read something about "avoid big-big" or similar nonsense, it is just some nostalgic individual trying to create a reality distortion to bring back the "spirit of the 80s" into our era. You know, those times when there was still some bounce in their bungees and when their drivetrain expertise was still applicable...

Last edited by AndreyT; 03-05-26 at 05:08 PM.
AndreyT is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.