Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

When is 39/27 not a 39/27???

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

When is 39/27 not a 39/27???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-07 | 12:15 PM
  #1  
Donegal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Road Nazi Hunter
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Slow! But Ahead of You.

Bikes: Kuota Kredo, Litespeed Vortex, Aegis Victory, Burley Tandem, Cannondale Rush

When is 39/27 not a 39/27???

I'm still looking for the answer. I am somewhat of a wrench and have built my last carbon screamer from scratch. Aegis carbon frame, Campy Compact 10 speed, Mavic Ksyrium SSl's, Ouzo Pro peloton fork w/2 degrees extra rake,K-wing bars, all the toys.

I recently went to the mountains with a friend on my new scoot, Kuota Kredo w/Dura-Ace, which I bought already built up. I am a fairly strong rider with very strong legs. 600 lb. leg presses are no problem. I was riding w/my usual partner, a personal trainer who just finished an Olympic length triathalon. While riding uphill in the smallest gear 39/27, I felt like I was 2-3 gears higher. I have ridden hills before, I live in North Georgia. I climbed 2 hills with somewhat strong 7.5-15% grades. I noticed my partner was spinning comfortably 60-70+ rpm and I was struggling 30-45 rpm with both of us in the smallest gear. I know they were the same because I maintain his bike and put the 12-27 cassette on it.

This disparity kept up for 3 hours until I finally cracked. When he came back for me and pulled me up the hill, we kept comparing cadences and I was allways 10-18 rpm lower even at a crawl. I haven't pulled the crank yet, but have counted teeth 3 times. 39. I could understand if this crankset was 42 or 44 but I count 39. I have to spin the cranks and count, but I am going to take them off and count again.

Is 39/27 allways 39/27? I would think so. The diameter of the gears must be the same, the links of the chain fit the gear. Any ideas???? So far, the only problem I found was the way the rear derailleur was mounted. It was obviously mounted w/tension on the spring and was off far enough that the tensioning screw was totally useless. I noticed that the roller on the derailleur had no clearance to the big cog. I could see some possible chain bind there which would account for the difficulity to pedal. It's the cadence that doesn't really make sense. Like I said, I crawled up the hills, one pedal stroke at a time. The level of difficulty was so great, my low back was threatening to fail. I am better on the flats and rollers, but this was ridiculous. Would welcome ideas.
Donegal is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-07 | 12:19 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Eugene OR

Bikes: VooDoo Limba, 2000 GF Kai Tai, old lugged fixies

Same crank arm length?
fiver is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-07 | 12:32 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 9
From: Oklahoma

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

The fact that your friend was going faster at a faster cadence does not prove anything about relative gearing, maybe you were just having a bad day. If you want to compare gearing and cadence the two of you should ride a flat road in the lowest gear and compare cadence and speed.

Al
Al1943 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-07 | 12:44 PM
  #4  
Donegal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Road Nazi Hunter
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Slow! But Ahead of You.

Bikes: Kuota Kredo, Litespeed Vortex, Aegis Victory, Burley Tandem, Cannondale Rush

My friend wasn't going faster though. I was on his wheel. We rode the remainder of the hill with me hanging onto his tire (wheelsucker) for dear life. Another poster mentioned crank length, his are actually longer 175 vs. 172.5, minimal and longer should be slower not faster. Maybe you're right, I might have had one of those days. I am a believer that somedays you are bulletproof and others, you just plain suck. I did fall prey to a stomach bug the next 4 days and couldn't eat.

I know he is stronger, it's the cadence that has me bugged. I have since fixed the derailleur mounting and am going to tear the cranks off and check teeth and bearings. Thanks.
Donegal is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-07 | 01:08 PM
  #5  
zac's Avatar
zac
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
From: Mass

Bikes: I just ride them, they own me.

I think what the OP is trying to say is why was his buddy spinning in a 39/27 at 70 rpm while he was dogging it in the same gear (39/27) at 45 rpm, YET THEY WERE STILL GOING THE SAME SPEED!

I have three suggestions:

1) rear tire pressure, was your friend's tire pressure low for some reason (giving him a smaller rear wheel diameter)?
2) was he on 650s instead of 700s?
3) were you really on the 27? Or was your limit screw on the rear derailleur preventing you from getting into the 27 and you were really on the 25, and just didnt notice it?
zac is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-07 | 01:51 PM
  #6  
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 1
Crank length wouldn't matter here, that doesn't affect gearing, just effort level and whatnot. Tire pressure and small variations in tire size among manufacturers wouldn't give you a 20% or more difference.

What is most likely going on if you're actually in the same gear is that his pedal stroke is rounder and cleaner, so he's actually pedaling all the way around at a constant speed while you're coasting slightly at the dead zones (cranks vertical). This is easy to do if you're really hammering/grinding it out. I'd think you'd hear it given that mavic freehubs are pretty loud, but maybe not.
Landgolier is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-07 | 03:25 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 9
From: Oklahoma

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

The longer pedals add some additional leverage but make no difference to cadence or gear ratios.
Al1943 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-07 | 03:40 PM
  #8  
Bicycling Gnome
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 1
From: 55.0N 1.59W
How accurate can you be in these circumstances about your own cadence, let alone someone elses? Granted, you may have some gadget that counts this, but it defies logic that two identically geared bikes were traveling at the same speed with the riders making different number of strokes per minute, if they were in the same gear. It isn't possible, assuming they have the same wheel diameter. Small diameter differences couldn't account for the cadence difference either you quote either (70 / 45) , so tyre pressure isn't the cause. Could it be that you just weren't well and it felt like you were pedalling slower and with more labour?

If that isn't it, then I'd check that the bikes are identically geared, and that yours is changing through the full range under load.

I think ZAC hits the issue above. Most likely your pal was in a different gear to you. I'd put it at 95% that this is the answer. You'd likely struggle to keep with him too if he was spinning as you say, because obviously he will exert more power with less exhaustion spinning than can be achieved by a similar rider working at a slower cadence.

Unless you looked at the block to check you were in the gear you think you were, there could have been some problem with your gear change. Maybe it stuck a gear or two higher, regardless of what you did with the shifter.

Last edited by EvilV; 09-29-07 at 03:54 PM.
EvilV is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-07 | 04:44 PM
  #9  
kenhill3's Avatar
use your best eye
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 1
From: Olympia, Washington

Bikes: '75 Bertin, '93 Parkpre Team 925, '04 Kona King Kikapu, '05 Bianchi Vigorelli

Originally Posted by EvilV
............ but it defies logic that two identically geared bikes were traveling at the same speed with the riders making different number of strokes per minute, if they were in the same gear. It isn't possible, assuming they have the same wheel diameter.


+1- Not possible.
kenhill3 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-07 | 07:52 PM
  #10  
StephenH's Avatar
Uber Goober
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 11,756
Likes: 42
From: Dallas area, Texas
Different size wheels or tires would make a small difference. Wrong number of teeth on the rear, or not being in the gear you thought you were would be a bigger issue. Perhaps a combination of several factors. If all else fails, turn both bikes upside down and compare them side by side.

Someone posted something about a skip-tooth sprocket, which I've not seen, but might throw your for a loop if present.
StephenH is offline  
Reply
Old 09-30-07 | 02:09 PM
  #11  
sfrider's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 203
From: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Are you sure your friend doesn't have a compact crankset?
sfrider is offline  
Reply
Old 10-01-07 | 12:26 PM
  #12  
HokuLoa's Avatar
Blissketeer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by sfrider
Are you sure your friend doesn't have a compact crankset?
+1
HokuLoa is offline  
Reply
Old 10-01-07 | 12:34 PM
  #13  
roadfix's Avatar
hello
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,710
Likes: 136
From: Los Angeles
The difference in rpm that the OP mentioned is huge. His partner had to be pushing a smaller chainring. It can't be a matter of different sized tire or wheel diameter because of the huge diff in rpm noted. I'm going with the compact crankset theory too.
roadfix is offline  
Reply
Old 10-01-07 | 06:00 PM
  #14  
Gonzo Bob's Avatar
cycles per second
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 203
From: Minnesota

Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110

If your riding partner really has 39/27 low gear, there are two possibilities.

1) Smaller wheel. But based how much of a difference you say there was in cadence, it would have to be a pretty small wheel, and much smaller than 650C, so this is not likely.
2) Internal geared hub with low less than 1:1. OK, not likely, since if you have internal gears, why also run a multiple freewheel.

Much more likely is that you are mistaken on the 39/27 and he has a compact or even a triple.
Gonzo Bob is offline  
Reply
Old 10-01-07 | 07:06 PM
  #15  
cab horn
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 28,353
Likes: 31
From: Toronto

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Originally Posted by roadfix
It can't be a matter of different sized tire or wheel diameter because of the huge diff in rpm noted.
+1
operator is offline  
Reply
Old 10-01-07 | 08:58 PM
  #16  
Deanster04's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 2
From: Boulder, Colorado

Bikes: Cinelli Supercoursa 69, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Mondonico Diamond Extra 05, Coors Light Greg Lemond (built by Scapin) 88, Scapin MTB, Stumpjumper 83, Specialized Stumpjumper M4, Lemond Poprad 2001

Sounds like your derailluer may be not staying in the lowest cassette. If your small pulley is rubbing when it is in the lowest gear you need to shorten your chain. For a good method see Sheldon Browns web site. If you have a 39/27 then it is the same everywhere even in Australia or in the chronosynclastic infandibulum. Good luck.
Deanster04 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-02-07 | 02:50 AM
  #17  
gcl8a's Avatar
Je pose, donc je suis.
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
From: Odense, Denmark
Originally Posted by Deanster04
...If you have a 39/27 then it is the same everywhere even in Australia ...
Except that it turns backwards in the southern hemisphere, right?

I'm going with compact crankset on the friend's bike and the OP's inability to estimate cadence.
gcl8a is offline  
Reply
Old 10-02-07 | 10:20 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,820
Likes: 133
Allright, the difinitive way to determine if you have the same gear, measure the roll out.

Put one crank up against a good reference on the bike, like the leading edge of the crank lined up with a bolt on the front der. Mark the contact patch of the front wheel on the ground. Turn the crank and guide the bike in a straight line until the crank comes back to precisely the place it started and make another mark where the contact patch of the front tire is. Do the same with your friends bike.

If the distance is the same with both bikes, you have the same gear.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
San Rensho is offline  
Reply
Old 10-02-07 | 10:52 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Kentwood michigan.

Bikes: too many

tire size could make a difference, but not that huge.
I have two bikes that I ride regularly, if I match cadence with my friend on one bike I match him with speed, if I match up on the other bike I'll pass him in a few stroke, gears are the same, but tires on the 'faster' bike are 27x1-1/8, matching bikes both have 700-25's

39/27 will be 39/27 regardless of the crankset, 1.44:1 is 1.44:1, rim/tire size is the only thing that will change effective gearing if both bikes have the same gears.
If you hadn't counted them and just 'felt' that they weren't right, I'd blame it on the altitude.

Ken.
kendall is offline  
Reply
Old 10-02-07 | 01:33 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,369
Likes: 0
From: Reston, VA

Bikes: 2003 Giant OCR2

If it happens again, swap bikes for a mile.
Mr. Underbridge is offline  
Reply
Old 10-02-07 | 01:40 PM
  #21  
DannoXYZ's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,754
Likes: 26
From: Mesa, AZ

Bikes: Moots RCS, tandem, beach-cruiser, MTB, Specialized-Allez road-bike, custom track-bike

Sounds like your bike may have locked out the lowest gear? You may have been in a 39x25t while your buddy was in 39x27t. Check while riding to make sure you really are in your lowest gear. I know on some early alloy & carbon frames with standard-diameter tubing, the frame were really soft and auto-shifted into a higher gear when flexed uphill. Annoyed the heck out of me as I'd be struggling and not know why. Then I'd look down and find that it had shifted 1-2 gears higher.
DannoXYZ is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.