bent triangle
#1
Thread Starter
extra bitter

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 7
Bikes: Miyata 210, Fuji Royale II, Bridgestone Kabuki, Miyata Ninety
bent triangle
I just obtained an old mixte frame through eBay. Opening the box, I immediately noticed the one of the long stays from the head tube to the dropout is bent. Not mangled, but there's a noticeable bend on the drive side, probably ~3mm worth of bend, but it's hard to gauge exactly.
So my question is whether I ought to make a big deal of this. It's steel, so I suppose I could bend it back (maybe that's a bad idea?). But why would it be bent in the first place? If it were cold set to accommodate a narrower hub and it had been done properly, should I expect something less noticeable and a more even bend -- i.e. not the one-sided bend I'm observing? The fact that only the long stay is bent, not the seat stay or the chain stay, makes me doubt it has anything to do with intentional setting anyway.
Below is an overhead photo where you can see the bend relative to the seat stay. I generally like to assume good faith, and this seller did have great feedback, but I can't help noticing the photos in the eBay post are all from the front left side of the bike, obscuring the bend ...

Any opinions? It didn't sell for much, but with shipping I paid just enough that I want to make sure this isn't structurally worthless. Thanks.
So my question is whether I ought to make a big deal of this. It's steel, so I suppose I could bend it back (maybe that's a bad idea?). But why would it be bent in the first place? If it were cold set to accommodate a narrower hub and it had been done properly, should I expect something less noticeable and a more even bend -- i.e. not the one-sided bend I'm observing? The fact that only the long stay is bent, not the seat stay or the chain stay, makes me doubt it has anything to do with intentional setting anyway.
Below is an overhead photo where you can see the bend relative to the seat stay. I generally like to assume good faith, and this seller did have great feedback, but I can't help noticing the photos in the eBay post are all from the front left side of the bike, obscuring the bend ...

Any opinions? It didn't sell for much, but with shipping I paid just enough that I want to make sure this isn't structurally worthless. Thanks.
#2
Low car diet
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 4
From: Corvallis, OR, USA
Bikes: 2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.
I have a mixte frame and it has the same outward bend on the drive side middle/long stay. I think it is to make extra room for the chain (especially in the big ring). My frame is built up as a single speed now, so can't test that theory. But, I think it's an intentional design feature.
#3
Thread Starter
extra bitter

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 7
Bikes: Miyata 210, Fuji Royale II, Bridgestone Kabuki, Miyata Ninety
That makes me feel a whole lot better, and it makes sense to boot. Now that I think about it, there's no damage to the paint there either, so I guess I should have considered that it might not be damaged after all.
Thanks for the help.
Thanks for the help.
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 2
From: Boulder, Colorado
Bikes: Cinelli Supercoursa 69, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Mondonico Diamond Extra 05, Coors Light Greg Lemond (built by Scapin) 88, Scapin MTB, Stumpjumper 83, Specialized Stumpjumper M4, Lemond Poprad 2001
If you are worried take it to a local frame builder and have them check the frame alignment.




