question about triple crank
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
question about triple crank
Hello fella's,
I currently have an older trek road bike with indexed downtube shifters. I've been doing some touring on this bike and now want to put a triple crank on it. I've got a new long cage rear derailluer, the correct bottom bracket, and a sugino triple crank, my question is do I need a new front derailluer as well? the current set-up on the bike is a double crankset.
any help would be appreciated, thanks in advance.
I currently have an older trek road bike with indexed downtube shifters. I've been doing some touring on this bike and now want to put a triple crank on it. I've got a new long cage rear derailluer, the correct bottom bracket, and a sugino triple crank, my question is do I need a new front derailluer as well? the current set-up on the bike is a double crankset.
any help would be appreciated, thanks in advance.
#2
on your left.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,802
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Bikes: Scott SUB 30, Backtrax MTB
hm...i'm might get this wrong, but i'll take a shot at it. since it's indexed, all you'll need is a new shifter. I THINK. it's possble that the front derailleur was just made for two chainrings, but i'm willing to bet it can be made to work with a triple. if not, i think you could go friction shifting and definitly make it work.
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Dover, NH USA
Bikes: 1986 Bridgestone 500, 1981 Motobecane Super Mirage
You will likely need a new front derailleur as well, to handle the larger difference between the front cranks. This would depend on the model of your existing front derailleur.
Depending on the cranks, you could keep the double and swap the chainrings to a smaller size. Moving from say, a 42/52 to a 34/48 would offer a much lower gear for climbing. Unfortunately this option is probably no cheaper than a larger capacity front derailleur.
Depending on the cranks, you could keep the double and swap the chainrings to a smaller size. Moving from say, a 42/52 to a 34/48 would offer a much lower gear for climbing. Unfortunately this option is probably no cheaper than a larger capacity front derailleur.
#4
Your mom

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 2
You would also want a triple FD for the profile. You could probably shift a triple crank with a double FD, but it wouldn't work so well. Triple FDs have extra room where they need it and lumps and bumps to push your chain in the right places.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 9
From: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
You will probably need a new front derailleur, of course you could try the old one.
I doubt that you need a new front shifter, all you really need is a friction shifter for the front. Does the old shifter actually have clickstops? If so, how many?
Al
I doubt that you need a new front shifter, all you really need is a friction shifter for the front. Does the old shifter actually have clickstops? If so, how many?
Al
#7
Banned
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,585
Likes: 6,538
From: TN
I would try it. You will need to lower the FD on the seat tube. If you have a problem it will likely be that the chain drops when shifting to the small ring. Triples have a deeper inside plate so if you get a new one be sure it will clear your middle ring when going to the big ring. For example, a 10 sp Ultegra made for a 39 tooth middle ring will not work well with a 9sp Ultegra crank with 42t middle ring. Don't ask....
#8
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
a double fd doesn't have enough capacity to clear the chain on the small ring. it's just not long enough even if you lower it as far as you can. it also isn't designed to travel far enough in and out. just get a new fd. they're cheap anyway.
#9
I would try it first since you've got nothing to lose. The profile of the triple vs double is only important if using indexed shifters. Capacity is the most likely problem, but there may be enough room, depending on the bike's geometry.





