Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Truing a wheel by a LBS

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Truing a wheel by a LBS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-24-09, 12:39 PM
  #26  
Great State of Varmint
 
Panthers007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
I've actually tested the spoke-tension - using an FSA tension-meter - without tire on, and with tire on and inflated. In most cases, there was a notable drop of spoke-tension after mounting and inflating said tire. And the true quite often changes as well. As a chemist - I know how to make accurate measurements of such animals. If I didn't, I'd likely be in the ionosphere today.

As for the person who brought in a wheel, with tire and tube on which had a slow leak, and got it back with a new inner-tube: The mechanic likely didn't know there was a slow leak and may have thought he/she had pinched your tube on remounting it. He/she gave you the benefit of the doubt. And a new inner-tube. Sign of a decent shop.
Panthers007 is offline  
Old 12-24-09, 01:21 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kamtsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by noglider
Thanks Tom. This is what I was looking for.

BTW, the WAG4 seems to be the right dish too for me since it works on 20" wheels.

Kam
kamtsa is offline  
Old 12-24-09, 04:13 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Operator is correct on this one, at least when dealing with a high pressure road wheel. Normal riding pressure can change the spoke tension, wheel dish and sometimes lateral true on rear wheels. I've tested this several times and the difference from a bare rim to 115 psi can chainge spoke tension 5%. These tests have been on Open Pro and DT Swiss RR 1.1 rims. Wheel dish has been effected by about 1/2 mm. May not seem like much but it does it every time so I've learned to make my final dishing and truing with the tires mounted.

Al
Al1943 is offline  
Old 12-24-09, 04:45 PM
  #29  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,962

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Liked 2,936 Times in 1,671 Posts
What dishing tool touches the rim and not the tires?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 12-24-09, 05:01 PM
  #30  
Type 1 Racer
 
rydaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 2,579

Bikes: A dozen or so.

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Park

rydaddy is offline  
Old 12-24-09, 05:51 PM
  #31  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,962

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Liked 2,936 Times in 1,671 Posts
Ooh, that's hot!
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 12-24-09, 06:28 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Ha! I just bought one of those but haven't used it yet. I wanted to by a tension gage, too, but the $100 price for the pair put me off - way off.

Too bad no one rents the gages. It'd be nice to know (quantitatively) that you are in the right ballpark in tension rather than just relying on the "sproing!".

I used to make my final tensioning and dishing adjustments on the bike with the tires installed and inflated. I guess I just got lucky doing it that way.

Last edited by Mike Mills; 12-24-09 at 06:55 PM.
Mike Mills is offline  
Old 12-24-09, 10:01 PM
  #33  
punk kid.
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: orange county, ca
Posts: 84

Bikes: 1970's Nishiki, Late 70's Centurion Super Elite

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mas-az
I fear you know not what you say, Operator regardless of your 25,000+ posts. You cannot put enough pressure into a tire to affect the wheel without blowing the tire or tube or both. Pure BS.
+1 if air pressure in a tire is enough to mess the true significantly on a rim.. i would be more worried about the integrity of the wheel or the braking surface thickness or something.., second, ive never seen this happen on any rim. ever.
rs1101 is offline  
Old 12-24-09, 11:52 PM
  #34  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,962

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Liked 2,936 Times in 1,671 Posts
It happens. It doesn't compromise the integrity, but it can push it out of true a bit. Not much, but a bit.

Remember, a few of us have been or are currently bike mechanics. We've seen a lot of bikes, and our experience has shown things you haven't seen yet. Not BS.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 12-25-09, 11:41 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 71

Bikes: Bruce Gordon, SOMA Stanyan

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Remember, a few of us have been or are currently bike mechanics. We've seen a lot of bikes, and our experience has shown things you haven't seen yet. Not BS.
And your experience is greatly appreciated. That response was generated because Operator was replying as the spokesperson for the bike mechanic community saying that you all don't prefer to have the tyre/tire removed. That was the BS I was talking about.
Had Operator said "I prefer....Because..." I would not have responded. As I see it Operator had to take and twist the issue with edge cases so he could mark his territory on this forum.
Doesn't matter which forum you got to, bicycles, Smith & Wesson et al you'll find the alpha wolves lurking waiting for fresh meat to chew into and spit out. And the pack hierarchy can generally be determined by the number of posts an individual has made.

I hope everyone had a great Holiday today.
mas-az is offline  
Old 12-25-09, 12:13 PM
  #36  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,962

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Liked 2,936 Times in 1,671 Posts
True, but watcha gonna do? He is who he is. Don't like his manners? You don't have to, I guess. I don't, either, but he's clearly a good mechanic, and I learn from him, and we all can, too.

I still prefer to true wheels without a tire, but I find it interesting that he likes the tire on his wheels.

Merry Christmas, everyone!
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 12-25-09, 12:33 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
The tire and tube thingy...

I like having the customer bring 'em in and on either to me or the shops that I do wheels for.

1. Keeps fallover or bump damage from happening...you'd be amazed at how often bare wheels on the ground fall over and hanging bare wheels get dinged by other bare wheels.
2. I'll do my truing and build bare...not a bother really to take 'em off...big frickin deal.
3. When done putting the tire and tube back on provides:

- Ultimate test of overtension.
- Further test of stress relief.

...should a nipple or two do the "tink" thingy...there's a chance to do a "click" here and there before the customer picks it up.

=8-)
mrrabbit is offline  
Old 12-25-09, 12:49 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by rs1101
+1 if air pressure in a tire is enough to mess the true significantly on a rim.. i would be more worried about the integrity of the wheel or the braking surface thickness or something.., second, ive never seen this happen on any rim. ever.
If you've built enough wheels and use a tensionmeter to measure spoke-tension before and after mounting a tyre & pumping it up, you WILL learn over the course of building hundreds of wheelsets that the air-pressure DOES push inwards on the rim and decrease the spoke-tension. Typically about -5-10% based upon the rim-stiffness and actual spoke-tension. Depending upon how true the unlaced bare rim is and the amount of dish, this change in spoke-tension will throw the wheel out of spec.
DannoXYZ is offline  
Old 12-25-09, 01:48 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 71

Bikes: Bruce Gordon, SOMA Stanyan

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mrrabbit thanks. A response that makes it clear why it doesn't make any difference. I'm sure there is one or two of us that have learned a thing or two from it. I did for sure.
And you did it without kicking my butt. Kind of like something Sheldon Brown would do.
I have learned to beware the ..er. Because there is always someone mightier, richer, smarter, nastier, meaner, and greater then I'll ever be. And I have said this before, experience is the sum of your failures and I fail a lot.
mas-az is offline  
Old 12-25-09, 06:25 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,562

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Liked 729 Times in 518 Posts
I'm prolly not alone in being quite surprised by this...

So, in order for the spoke tension to be reduced by as much as 5% (!), the rim - which is designed to resist forces in the direction of its centre more than anything else - obviously has to be significantly compressed to a smaller diameter...

Weird. I would not have guessed; being under the impression that it takes a lot more force than that to compress a solid...

I wonder how much decrease in diameter we're talking about here? It should be measurable... half a millimetre or something?
Kimmo is offline  
Old 12-25-09, 06:52 PM
  #41  
Great State of Varmint
 
Panthers007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
I'm prolly not alone in being quite surprised by this...

So, in order for the spoke tension to be reduced by as much as 5% (!), the rim - which is designed to resist forces in the direction of its centre more than anything else - obviously has to be significantly compressed to a smaller diameter...

Weird. I would not have guessed; being under the impression that it takes a lot more force than that to compress a solid...




I wonder how much decrease in diameter we're talking about here? It should be measurable... half a millimetre or something?
If you'd care to splurge and find out for sure - which I am - this is arguably the best. And not the most expensive:

https://www.biketoolsetc.com/index.cg...item_id=FS-STM

It's what I use. One-handed & easy.
Panthers007 is offline  
Old 12-25-09, 06:57 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,562

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Liked 729 Times in 518 Posts
Seems a lovely bit of kit, and I'd like to have one, but at that price it'll be a while before it gets to the top of my pile of priorities...
Kimmo is offline  
Old 12-25-09, 10:15 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
So, in order for the spoke tension to be reduced by as much as 5% (!), the rim - which is designed to resist forces in the direction of its centre more than anything else - obviously has to be significantly compressed to a smaller diameter...
Not significant at all. Here's how to find your answer:

1. look up Young's Modulus for 6061 aluminium
2. look up Young's Modulus for 18-8 stainless steel
3. calculate cross-sectional area of a 2.0mm SS spoke
4. calculate the amount of elongation of a 290mm spoke at 1000-1300 N.
5. calculate the decrease in elongation needed to reduce tension by 5-10%

Also what can you conclude by comparing #1 versus #2???

Last edited by DannoXYZ; 12-26-09 at 02:20 PM.
DannoXYZ is offline  
Old 12-26-09, 11:39 AM
  #44  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,962

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Liked 2,936 Times in 1,671 Posts
DannoXYZ, there you go again, injecting your superior knowledge and understanding to debunk all of our misperceptions.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 12-26-09, 05:47 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
DannoXYZ, there you go again, injecting your superior knowledge and understanding to debunk all of our misperceptions.
So I guess you, myself, Al1943, Operator and company are no longer needed here, right?

...we'll just let Danno do all the educating while we actually build the wheels and rake in the dough!

Great! Sounds like a deal!

=8-)
mrrabbit is offline  
Old 12-26-09, 06:42 PM
  #46  
Great State of Varmint
 
Panthers007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
Is this a new trend I smell? Using a 40-foot stage-cane to yank people off their pedestals? Be careful - they may come for you one day!
Panthers007 is offline  
Old 12-26-09, 09:57 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,562

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Liked 729 Times in 518 Posts
Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
1. look up Young's Modulus for 6061 aluminium
2. look up Young's Modulus for 18-8 stainless steel
~70GPa, ~200GPa
3. calculate cross-sectional area of a 2.0mm SS spoke
πmm^2
4. calculate the amount of elongation of a 290mm spoke at 1000-1300 N.
5. calculate the decrease in elongation needed to reduce tension by 5-10%
CBF figuring how to do that ATM

Also what can you conclude by comparing #1 versus #2???
Maybe that although the rim will be distorted by spoke tension easily enough, it generally isn't since the stainless increases tension rapidly compared to elongation?
Kimmo is offline  
Old 12-26-09, 10:40 PM
  #48  
Great State of Varmint
 
Panthers007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
This simple piece of freeware (really) can convert all sorts of things, like ATM's to mm/Hg etc., for all sorts of applications. Have fun:

https://joshmadison.com/software/convert-for-windows/

Download free to your computer.
Panthers007 is offline  
Old 12-27-09, 04:34 AM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
Also what can you conclude by comparing #1 versus #2???
Maybe that although the rim will be distorted by spoke tension easily enough, it generally isn't since the stainless increases tension rapidly compared to elongation?
You got half of it. Yes, due to the much, much higher stiffness of stainless steel, it generates tension with minimal elongation. Aluminium however, is 1/3rd the stiffness and for the same tension, it will elongate 3x as much as steel given the same force.

Do a test with a bare spoke and bare rim. Pull on opposite ends of the spoke with as much force as you can and notice how it feels and see how much it stretches. Then push on the bare rim and see how much it compresses into an oval. Notice any differences?

Basically in a coupled system where the same force goes from one part to the other, the weaker one will "give" more from the same force. The rim doesn't have to compress much in order to reduce spoke-elongation enough to reduce tension by 5%. Check out Jobst Brandt's book.

Heck, we don't even have to debate arm-chair physics and bike-mechanics of the various "whys" and "how" something works. Just get a tensionmeter and check it out yourself.
DannoXYZ is offline  
Old 12-27-09, 11:48 AM
  #50  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,962

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Liked 2,936 Times in 1,671 Posts
Ooh, you guys are so sexy when you talk technical!
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.