Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Inside diameter of the fork larger than the locknut-to-locknut distance on the axle.

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Inside diameter of the fork larger than the locknut-to-locknut distance on the axle.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-10 | 10:17 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Full Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 357
Likes: 15
Inside diameter of the fork larger than the locknut-to-locknut distance on the axle.

My fork measures about 101 mm inside diameter, and the outside diameter is 112 so each side of the fork is about 5.5 mm thick.

My axle is 108 mm long, and the locknut-to-locknut distance is 97.5 mm meaning that 5.25 mm axle length protrudes in to the fork with a 0.25 mm clearance deadspace on each side of the fork.

My question:

I have to squeeze the fork about 3.5 mm when I mount the wheel. Any problems doing this?
Raleigh71 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-13-10 | 10:22 PM
  #2  
mechBgon's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 6
That could be dangerous, but the biggest reason is that you've only got that 0.25mm of "deadspace" for your skewer's conical spring to be compressed into. In that situation, the ends of your quick-release skewer actually may not be clamping onto your fork's dropout, they're just bottoming out on the pancaked conical spring instead.

I'm guessing your wheel is missing some washers between the locknuts and cones. Pics?
mechBgon is offline  
Reply
Old 01-13-10 | 10:27 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Full Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 357
Likes: 15
Actually I replaced the cones and the new cones were a little larger. I compensated by using thinner locknuts. I could actually use the larger locknuts but that would diminish the length of axle that actually protrudes into the fork, by 2 mm. I was concerned about having too short a length of axle in the fork.

Comment?
Raleigh71 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-13-10 | 10:38 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 437
Likes: 0

Bikes: late 80's bianchi campion d'italia, early 90's trek 2100, early 90's shogun selectra, mid 90's aluminum marin xcMTB, dept. store grade but upgraded columbia double eagle tandem

I am not a professional mechanic, however if you are not bottoming out your quick release threads, by which i mean you can finger tighten them to the point that you are unable to flip the cam into the lock position..I think you are fine. you are squeezing your fork, minimally, from what i can tell once your fork blades are compressed against the locknuts there is no difference in what is going on when you tighten your QR as when things fit "perfect".

EDIT did not realize you were using a frankenstien wheel. as you have since clarified. i still may be right, i do know that a modestly oversize locknut width is no big deal. however it is possible that your QR skewer doesn't have enough threading/room inside for it to work properly. if you CAN tighten it and secure it as per normal you are probably fine. also as long as your axle protrudes into and a little past the outside of your dropouts it should be plenty.

Last edited by kludgefudge; 01-13-10 at 10:47 PM. Reason: new info
kludgefudge is offline  
Reply
Old 01-13-10 | 10:45 PM
  #5  
mechBgon's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by Raleigh71
Actually I replaced the cones and the new cones were a little larger. I compensated by using thinner locknuts. I could actually use the larger locknuts but that would diminish the length of axle that actually protrudes into the fork, by 2 mm. I was concerned about having too short a length of axle in the fork.
How about picking up some 1.2mm spacers from your LBS (there are usually chainring spacers available in that width that'll do the job), install them between your cones and thinner locknuts, and then you'll be just about on-target. In the meanwhile, if there's any doubt about the issue I described above, leave out your conical springs for now.
mechBgon is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jonwvara
Classic & Vintage
22
05-16-20 08:50 AM
dave25
Bicycle Mechanics
9
06-25-18 11:54 AM
okane
Bicycle Mechanics
10
05-10-16 09:59 PM
PatrickGSR94
Bicycle Mechanics
14
05-31-12 09:34 PM
Raleigh71
Bicycle Mechanics
6
12-26-09 03:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.