tire quality
#51
#52
Chasing the horizon.
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 500
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Bikes: 2016 Felt F75, 2008 Mercier Corvus Steel, 2006 Trek 4300, 1985 Trek 620 (modernized)
There's a difference between tires used for training and racing. Most of us are out here for the exercise and the fun of riding a bike and probably have budget concerns. TDF riders have flats and have a support vehicle to get 'em back racing. What I think the OP and most of us are seeking is that balance of decent road feel, durability and ruggedness. Light weight tires and wheels are easier to accelerate. Having said that smooth rolling heavy tires have inertia. The comments about the Conti Ultra Sport approaching Perpetual Motion may have something to due with the claimed weight of 340g for the wire bead or 270g for the folder vs. 205 for the GP 4000 (folder only)
For cost-effective tires, the Nashbar Prima Plus 2's do well, as long as their priced ~$10. They're not particularly good in any category, but are a nice balance of ride quality, performance and durability. They'd certainly be a good, cheap training or recreational tires.
EDIT: I do remember that I assumed the rider was a wedge for the purposes of calculating drag, which was probably generous. The actual drag is probably quite a bit more.
#53
I understand the difference, and that nothing will completely duplicate a nice tubular. But most folks ride clinchers these days, and don't want to run tubulars. These "open tubulars," which are the same exact tire as a nice tubular except for the clincher/tubular part, are as close as you can get to a nice tubular on a clincher rim. Click on the Challenge link I provided earlier in the thread. These are not your average clinchers, far from it.
#54
Artificial Member




Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,162
Likes: 7,551
From: The Cloud
Bikes: Retrospec Judd, Dahon Boardwalk, Specialized Langster
From what I've read since this thread got started is that the open tubulars are great in the road "feel" dept. but don't last very long. Great for racing or fast recreational riding. When I think of tire use for commuting (and I haven't commuted on a bike for years but I have and did for a few years) I think puncture proof and high mileage. I mean unless you are the boss showing up late to work on a regular basis because of tire problems isn't career friendly.
__________________
#55
#56
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln Ne
Bikes: RANS Stratus and a Mountain bike
Both my RANS recumbents came with Primo Comets. They are not an expensive tire. In 4 years riding, about 2000 miles a year, I have had 2 "on the road" flats, and about 3 more found at home on pre-ride checks. When I look in tire catalogues, the Comets are cheap and light. So many of the premium tires are quite heavy, especially with kevlar belts. The Comets are thin light and fast and inexpensive. Just saying.
#57
Senior Member

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,103
Likes: 96
From: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)
5 flats in 8000 miles might sound good to you but I like my 0 flats in close to 25,000 miles (I really should keep better track of mileage. Basically, I ride about 4-5k miles/year and haven't puncture flatted since the fall of 2004) running high quality, puncture proof tires. My latest choice (the Continentals described above) are very light weight. Not as light as a race tire but lighter than your average training tire.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
therhodeo
Road Cycling
25
04-18-14 09:32 AM






