seatpost inserton question
#1
seatpost inserton question
I have a 29r steel frame mtn. bike. Seatpost diameter is 27.2. To get the proper saddle height, I have to extend the stock 350mm easton seatpost about 2.5cm beyond the min. insertion line. This leaves ~8.5cm inserted into the frame, well below the top tube intersection. The specs for a thomson elite 410mm seatpost list a min. insert depth of 7.5cm. So, at 8.5cm inserted, am I okay, even though it is above the min. insert line? I was surprised the 2 manufacturers had min. insert lines so different.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
That surprises me too. Almost every seatpost I've ever measured, including long MTB types, have the minimum insertion mark about 7.5 -8.0 cm above the lower end. Having the end below the toptube/seattube intersection is important too but you report you are OK there.
I just measured several Easton and Trek house brand seatposts in my parts box in both 27.2 and 31.6 mm. All are MTB length and all have the minimum insertion 75 - 80 mm above the end. The one odd exception is an Easton EA30 (their cheapest, heaviest model) in 31.6 mm and the minimum insertion is 100 mm above the end.
I just measured several Easton and Trek house brand seatposts in my parts box in both 27.2 and 31.6 mm. All are MTB length and all have the minimum insertion 75 - 80 mm above the end. The one odd exception is an Easton EA30 (their cheapest, heaviest model) in 31.6 mm and the minimum insertion is 100 mm above the end.
#3
maybe it's an easton thing? Just measured my easton, it's 100mm also.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 578
From: Loveland, CO
Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2
There are many different minimum insertion length that range from 7-10cm. Thre's no way to know what's driving those differences.
I have three frames that all have 27.2mm reducing bushings built into the frame, that are no more than 6cm in length. From an insertion standpoint, anything over 6cm just hangs in the open space below the bushing and does nothing.
The other side of the issue is maximum extension. If you can see 2.5cm of the post that's supposed to be inside the frame, then you've gone beyond the maximum extension. Whether that's an issue or not is hard to say. You'll never get a manufacturer to say it's OK, but it may cause no problem. How badly do you abuse your seatpost? Do you slam yourself onto the saddle a lot? That might be a problem with too much extension.
I have three frames that all have 27.2mm reducing bushings built into the frame, that are no more than 6cm in length. From an insertion standpoint, anything over 6cm just hangs in the open space below the bushing and does nothing.
The other side of the issue is maximum extension. If you can see 2.5cm of the post that's supposed to be inside the frame, then you've gone beyond the maximum extension. Whether that's an issue or not is hard to say. You'll never get a manufacturer to say it's OK, but it may cause no problem. How badly do you abuse your seatpost? Do you slam yourself onto the saddle a lot? That might be a problem with too much extension.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
#6
I don't ride too hard, I'm too old! I'm going to keep a lookout for a deal on a thomson, but ride mine as is meanwhile.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#7
Senior Member


Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 30,225
Likes: 649
From: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
There are many different minimum insertion length that range from 7-10cm. Thre's no way to know what's driving those differences.
I have three frames that all have 27.2mm reducing bushings built into the frame, that are no more than 6cm in length. From an insertion standpoint, anything over 6cm just hangs in the open space below the bushing and does nothing.
The other side of the issue is maximum extension. If you can see 2.5cm of the post that's supposed to be inside the frame, then you've gone beyond the maximum extension. Whether that's an issue or not is hard to say. You'll never get a manufacturer to say it's OK, but it may cause no problem. How badly do you abuse your seatpost? Do you slam yourself onto the saddle a lot? That might be a problem with too much extension.
I have three frames that all have 27.2mm reducing bushings built into the frame, that are no more than 6cm in length. From an insertion standpoint, anything over 6cm just hangs in the open space below the bushing and does nothing.
The other side of the issue is maximum extension. If you can see 2.5cm of the post that's supposed to be inside the frame, then you've gone beyond the maximum extension. Whether that's an issue or not is hard to say. You'll never get a manufacturer to say it's OK, but it may cause no problem. How badly do you abuse your seatpost? Do you slam yourself onto the saddle a lot? That might be a problem with too much extension.






