MTB Headset vs. 'Road' Headset?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, Maine
Bikes: Raleigh 12sp road, Specialized Hard Rock MTB, 1977 Schwinn Hurricane 5-speed
MTB Headset vs. 'Road' Headset?
I've reached the point in my noob build/fixie where I must acquire the 1 1/8'' threadless headset. I really can't afford or even require a high end; Hope, Chris King, etc, so have been looking at Ritchey & Cane Creek as well as others. My question is this: Most of the units I've looked at are spec'd for mtb use, but suggest they can also be used for road bike use. What distinguishes a 'road' headset from that for a mtb? Should I avoid those units spec'd as suitable for either bike? Thanks in advance for any advice your experience can afford me....
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Headsets are headsets and as long as the diameter, type (threaded or threadless) and installation method (press-in cups or integrated) are the same and compatible with the frame.
FSA does make a "Pig DH" model that is particularly heavy and rugged as it is intended for downhill MTB use but it still works fine on a road bike if the somewhat clunky appearance isn't an issue.
I would recommend getting a cartridge bearing headset if at all possible as they are easier to install and maintain and tend to be more durable. I've had good luck with both FSA and Cane Creek headsets.
FSA does make a "Pig DH" model that is particularly heavy and rugged as it is intended for downhill MTB use but it still works fine on a road bike if the somewhat clunky appearance isn't an issue.
I would recommend getting a cartridge bearing headset if at all possible as they are easier to install and maintain and tend to be more durable. I've had good luck with both FSA and Cane Creek headsets.
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
The MTB headset is usually built a bit heavier and is supposed to be more durable.
Just get whichever will work for your frame, since headsets basically never fail unless they're abused.
The least important bearings on a bike is the headset.
Just get whichever will work for your frame, since headsets basically never fail unless they're abused.
The least important bearings on a bike is the headset.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#4
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
Not much, see what your head tube ID for what the insert is.. JIS is common .
Richey has a sealed bearing bottom race ball bearing top race , the bottom takes the hits.
so go for that .. cheap headsets that get replaced or posh ones that don't ..
either get you down the road..
Richey has a sealed bearing bottom race ball bearing top race , the bottom takes the hits.
so go for that .. cheap headsets that get replaced or posh ones that don't ..
either get you down the road..
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
For 1-1/8" headsets there is only one size so the JIS/ISO mis-match isn't an issue.





