Bottom Brackets
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,814
Bikes: Pinarello Veneto, Pinarello Montello, Bianchi Celeste
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Bottom Brackets
So i was just wondering something, i was talking to a person i met about bottom brackets, and he told me that on campagnolo cranks you have to have a campagnolo bottom bracket and the same goes for shimano,
why is this, shouldn't parts fit standard?
and the bottom bracket i have is a square taper shimano, i have an extra pretty good condition campagnolo crank that i want to put on the bike, but i haven't yet because of what he said
why is this, shouldn't parts fit standard?
and the bottom bracket i have is a square taper shimano, i have an extra pretty good condition campagnolo crank that i want to put on the bike, but i haven't yet because of what he said
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
219 Posts
Campy square taper and every-other-brand square taper use slightly different angles to the taper.
Means that when you mix you don't really know where the crank will end up on the axle. It can be manageable, it can throw the chainline off, it can cause cranks to strike chainstays or bottom out against the BB cup before achieving sufficient torque.
As for "standard" parts, I think you're overinterpreting the value and meaning of the word...
Ignoring the positioning / clearence issues, the parts will fit together, no problem there. But it's not recommended to keep transferring cranks from one type of BB to another, because of this fit issue.
Means that when you mix you don't really know where the crank will end up on the axle. It can be manageable, it can throw the chainline off, it can cause cranks to strike chainstays or bottom out against the BB cup before achieving sufficient torque.
As for "standard" parts, I think you're overinterpreting the value and meaning of the word...
Ignoring the positioning / clearence issues, the parts will fit together, no problem there. But it's not recommended to keep transferring cranks from one type of BB to another, because of this fit issue.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,617
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2001 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,047 Times
in
712 Posts
So, a Campy crank usually won't go adequately far up a JIS taper and a Shimano crank will usually go too far up an ISO taper. I say "usually" because the differences are small and tolerances sometimes let the cranks interchange adequately.
Try your Campy crank and see if it goes on the Shimano spindle far enough to be secure and if the chain line is good. It may work but there is no guarantee.
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Here's a fairly common information source:
https://sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html
I think a BF member did some actual measuring and refuted some of Sheldon Browns claims. Is there a link to that somewheres?
https://sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html
I think a BF member did some actual measuring and refuted some of Sheldon Browns claims. Is there a link to that somewheres?