Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Wheelbuilding questions from a total n00b

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Wheelbuilding questions from a total n00b

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-13, 02:14 PM
  #1  
Abuse Magnet
Thread Starter
 
arex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,870

Bikes: '91 Mtn Tek Vertical, '74 Raleigh Sports, '72 Raleigh Twenty, '84 Univega Gran Turismo, '09 Surly Karate Monkey, '92 Burley Rock-n-Roll, '86 Miyata 310, '76 Raleigh Shopper

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 174 Times in 88 Posts
Wheelbuilding questions from a total n00b

I've been reading threads, and reading books, and reading Sheldon...and I'm thinking I'm ready to try building a wheel. It's going to be a rear wheel, a new Mavic 26" rim laced up to an old Deore DX 7-speed hub, 32 holes. However, there are inevitable questions...

1. Nipples. Are there any advantages of alloy over brass besides weight? Are alloy more prone to galled threads than brass? I'm building for strength, since I'm a fat bastard, so the few grams that brass would cost me are irrelevant. I want to use whatever will hold up the best.

2. Spokes. Do I want straight for strength, or butted for springiness?

3. Spoke length. Using DT Swiss' spoke calculator, I came up with lengths within 1.5mm between left and right. I checked and rechecked my input, but I can't help but think I buggered something up somewhere. I haven't checked against any tables yet. Do I need to recheck my numbers, or is it normal to have spoke lengths that close?

Any other advice would be helpful, including "Just let a shop do it" if you think I'm headed for heartbreak.
arex is offline  
Old 01-29-13, 02:22 PM
  #2  
Domestic Domestique
 
UnsafeAlpine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,742

Bikes: Brand New Old Catamount! Schwinn Homegrown, Specialized FSR, Salsa Vaya, Salsa Chile Con Crosso

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
1. Use brass. Alloys are for weight and colors.

2. Go for double butted. The ride is better and the spokes are as strong or stronger than straight.

3. Yeah. I've had that happen. As long as you've punched in all the right numbers, the spoke lengths could be close to matching.
UnsafeAlpine is offline  
Old 01-29-13, 02:28 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
TampaRaleigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,940

Bikes: 1986 Raleigh Competition (Restored to Original), 1986 Cannonade SR400 (Updated to Dura Ace 7800)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by arex
1. Nipples. Are there any advantages of alloy over brass besides weight? Are alloy more prone to galled threads than brass? I'm building for strength, since I'm a fat bastard, so the few grams that brass would cost me are irrelevant. I want to use whatever will hold up the best.
Go with brass. Less likely to round the nipples too.

Originally Posted by arex
2. Spokes. Do I want straight for strength, or butted for springiness?
That "springiness" tends to make them less likely to break... so, it sorta makes them stronger. Go with butted.

Originally Posted by arex
3. Spoke length. Using DT Swiss' spoke calculator, I came up with lengths within 1.5mm between left and right. I checked and rechecked my input, but I can't help but think I buggered something up somewhere. I haven't checked against any tables yet. Do I need to recheck my numbers, or is it normal to have spoke lengths that close?
Double and triple check your numbers. I even ran it through a couple different calculators just to be safe.

Originally Posted by arex
Any other advice would be helpful, including "Just let a shop do it" if you think I'm headed for heartbreak.
DO IT!!! It's not that difficult, and it can be very rewarding! In the worst case, if you're having difficulty with tensioning and truing, any decent shop would be able to take it over from there and finish for you.

Good luck!!!
TampaRaleigh is offline  
Old 01-29-13, 03:49 PM
  #4  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,873

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1795 Post(s)
Liked 1,269 Times in 876 Posts
I've come out even slightly less than 1.5MM difference.

If you are using a 7 speed free hub body, spaced to 135MM, the wheel has much less dish, than say a 9 speed @ 130MM. Less dish = less difference in length.

You might also want to check with another calculator, such as Spokecalc.xls or EDD.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 01-29-13, 06:32 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times in 510 Posts
1. Brass.

2. Butted is stronger.

3. Yep, not a lot of dish on 7spd 135mm rear. Nice and strong.

Go for it. For a rear, I usually like to add the first round of tension to just the drive side first, to the point the wheel begins to feel halfway solid, and then add tension to the NDS. This avoids a lot of the effort of trying not to round off tight DS nipples, since it's an easier way of getting the DS up to tension.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 01-29-13, 08:11 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
1. Brass, but if you go alloy, go with quality DT Swiss alloy nipples. Make sure the rim has eyelets if you go alloy.
2. Butted if you can afford it...
3. You can also try https://www.mrrabbit.net/wheelsbyflemingapplications.php - grab the spreadsheet.

=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline  
Old 01-29-13, 08:33 PM
  #7  
S'Cruzer
 
pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 122W 37N
Posts: 2,445

Bikes: too many

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 17 Posts
your first few wheel builds should, IMHO, be conventional wheels with 32 or 36 spokes in 3 cross. when you can build those perfectly, THEN dabble in fancier stuff if you feel the need.
pierce is offline  
Old 01-29-13, 08:50 PM
  #8  
Abuse Magnet
Thread Starter
 
arex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,870

Bikes: '91 Mtn Tek Vertical, '74 Raleigh Sports, '72 Raleigh Twenty, '84 Univega Gran Turismo, '09 Surly Karate Monkey, '92 Burley Rock-n-Roll, '86 Miyata 310, '76 Raleigh Shopper

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 174 Times in 88 Posts
1. Brass it is.

2. Butted it is. I wasn't sure about the dynamics of this, and the butted spokes seemed a bit counterintuitive (in spite of what I'd read), which is why I was leaning towards straight spokes.

3. The EDD calculator came up with 1.8mm difference between sides, which is awfully close to the DT Swiss 1.5mm. Also, EDD knew about both my rim and my hub already, rather than relying on my measurements...so, I'm feeling pretty good about this.

...thank you, everyone. I feel semi-confident about this endeavor...and, as suggested, I can always pay a good shop to check my work.
arex is offline  
Old 01-29-13, 08:52 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
joetheun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 23

Bikes: Custom 12k carbon frame w/ Campy Super Record 11, Modified Cannondale touring bike, old CyclePro Oswego Commuter, Iron Horse Maverick Mtn bike. Building new touring bike Miele Toscana

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Agree with all that. Especially the start with the DS drive side. When you get that slightly tight check and adjust the hop or up and down movement of the rim. really easy to do when DS is the only spokes your working with then tighten the NDS to bring rim to center. Most importantly TAKE YOUR TIME. More beginner wheel builders try to tighten to quickly and then it gets really messed up trying to figure out whether or not to tighten or loosen when the wheel is wobbling all over. Also try to do it when you have a couple hours to yourself with out distractions. Have fun. I fine wheel building relaxing.
joetheun is offline  
Old 01-29-13, 08:53 PM
  #10  
S'Cruzer
 
pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 122W 37N
Posts: 2,445

Bikes: too many

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 17 Posts
the reason double butted spokes are better is, the thinner middle section is stretchier, this acts as a shock relief so the spoke heads don't take all the shock when you hit bumps etc, so they are much less prone to breaking at the end.
pierce is offline  
Old 01-29-13, 09:43 PM
  #11  
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
 
Jeff Wills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,840
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 806 Post(s)
Liked 708 Times in 378 Posts
Originally Posted by pierce
your first few wheel builds should, IMHO, be conventional wheels with 32 or 36 spokes in 3 cross. when you can build those perfectly, THEN dabble in fancier stuff if you feel the need.
4: Expect to spend a lot more time than you think putting the wheel together, and roughly forever getting it round, trued, and tensioned. Go slowly, get used to turning each nipple 1/4 turn at a time, and you'll be OK. Patience, and enjoy the process.

I spent two afternoons building and truing my first wheel. That was with experience truing wheels and under the tutelage of a master mechanic. That was also 35 years ago... wheel building is addictive: once you build a good one, you want to build another one, and another, and another... eventually you'll mortgage your house and your cat to buy more spokes and hubs and and and

Sorry, I haven't built a wheel in a while. I'm getting twitchy.
__________________
Jeff Wills

Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills is online now  
Old 01-30-13, 12:26 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 428

Bikes: 2003 Lemond Zurich; 1987 Schwinn Tempo; 1968 PX10; 1978 PX10LE, Peugeot Course; A-D Vent Noir

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by pierce
your first few wheel builds should, IMHO, be conventional wheels with 32 or 36 spokes in 3 cross. when you can build those perfectly, THEN dabble in fancier stuff if you feel the need.
And probably easier to begin with front wheels, so as to avoid having to deal with asymmetric dish. My first build was a 5-speed high-flange 36x3 rear wheel. It took a couple of days to get it tensioned and dished correctly. My next wheel was a plain low flange front 32x3, and it went together in a couple of hours. I also think a spoke tensiometer is very useful, especially when starting out. I know experts can do a great job by ear. I managed to build a half dozen wheels before I got one, and they worked fine for the way I used them (daily commute, occasional 50-100 mile road tours, but never anything very demanding). One good reason to use a tensiometer nowadays is that modern wheels use a variety of spoke materials, sizes, and shapes and these give different sounds when plucked, so it's more difficult than it used to be to know by sound when you've tightened the spokes to the correct tension.
neurocop is offline  
Old 01-30-13, 09:59 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 68
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Another tip: Don't trust the quoted ERD numbers for rim specs. Buy the rim first with a pair of spokes and nipples, then measure the rim ERD yourself. Thread the spoke ends and the nipple tops so they are flush, and measure the distance between the the spoke shoulders. Add that gap along with 2x the spoke length to get your new erd. Do calculations with the new ERD and order your spokes.
https://lenni.info/edd/howtomeasure
superfred is offline  
Old 01-31-13, 09:05 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
enjoybikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: montana
Posts: 196

Bikes: Early 90's Pinarello Gavia, '84 Guerciotti, '91 GF Hoo Koo e Koo, '88 Giant Iguana, '09 Specialized XC

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
lube

good tip i got and haven't heard it reiterated here is to apply plenty of lube, (tri-flow, etc.) to eyelets and nipple during truing/tensioning. the less friction the better and you get more actual nipple turn instead of spoke torsion.

My experience with the DT is spoke lengths coming out 1-2mm long, then running out of threads for adequate tension. I've been knocking 1-2mm off DT calc'd spoke lengths for my builds. Total of 4 wheels built now which isn't a huge database of info, just my experience.
enjoybikes is offline  
Old 01-31-13, 12:45 PM
  #15  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,873

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1795 Post(s)
Liked 1,269 Times in 876 Posts
Originally Posted by enjoybikes
My experience with the DT is spoke lengths coming out 1-2mm long, then running out of threads for adequate tension. I've been knocking 1-2mm off DT calc'd spoke lengths for my builds. Total of 4 wheels built now which isn't a huge database of info, just my experience.
Is that actually measured with a ruler or just the result of your wheel build?
I seem to be coming out 1MM short on my 3 builds (2 DT & 1 WS) and ordered the Park spoke gauge to measure future spokes.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 01-31-13, 12:58 PM
  #16  
Curmudgeon
 
Wil Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nausea, New Hamster
Posts: 1,572

Bikes: (see https://wildavis.smugmug.com/Bikes) Bianchi Veloce (2005), Nishiki Cascade (1992), Schwinn Super Sport (1983)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I recently finished a wheel-set using new hubs, but re-used the spokes, and checked the calculations (Spokecalc), finding them to be spot-on! (measured from the bend in the elbow to the tip using a metal rule). I used brass-washers under the spoke-heads (as recommended by Gerd Schraner) on this build, and found the wheels came up to tension beautifully, and left no problems with spokes poking out above the nipples. After the initial lacing, I started the tensioning with 1 clear thread left on each spoke, and followed Schraner's method to the letter (see his Truing Procedure table on p.85) Both wheels came up easily and required minimal tweaking to finish them.

- HTH

- Wil
Wil Davis is offline  
Old 01-31-13, 06:34 PM
  #17  
Abuse Magnet
Thread Starter
 
arex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,870

Bikes: '91 Mtn Tek Vertical, '74 Raleigh Sports, '72 Raleigh Twenty, '84 Univega Gran Turismo, '09 Surly Karate Monkey, '92 Burley Rock-n-Roll, '86 Miyata 310, '76 Raleigh Shopper

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 174 Times in 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Wil Davis
I recently finished a wheel-set using new hubs, but re-used the spokes, and checked the calculations (Spokecalc), finding them to be spot-on! (measured from the bend in the elbow to the tip using a metal rule). I used brass-washers under the spoke-heads (as recommended by Gerd Schraner) on this build, and found the wheels came up to tension beautifully, and left no problems with spokes poking out above the nipples. After the initial lacing, I started the tensioning with 1 clear thread left on each spoke, and followed Schraner's method to the letter (see his Truing Procedure table on p.85) Both wheels came up easily and required minimal tweaking to finish them.

- HTH

- Wil
If my rim has eyelets on the spoke holes, should I still use washers?
arex is offline  
Old 01-31-13, 06:37 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5788 Post(s)
Liked 2,580 Times in 1,430 Posts
Originally Posted by arex
If my rim has eyelets on the spoke holes, should I still use washers?
Generally no. But if you're using aluminum nipples, washers can help reduce scoring of the nipple.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 01-31-13, 06:48 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 59

Bikes: Catrike Pocket, a few others

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pierce
the reason double butted spokes are better is, the thinner middle section is stretchier, this acts as a shock relief so the spoke heads don't take all the shock when you hit bumps etc, so they are much less prone to breaking at the end.
Uh, no. The spoke has the same material throughout its length, therefore, the center is no "stretchier" than either end. It is, however, more flexible, and that flexibility means that the deflection is in the center, as opposed to the ends, which is more likely to break.
400trix is offline  
Old 01-31-13, 07:08 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5788 Post(s)
Liked 2,580 Times in 1,430 Posts
Originally Posted by 400trix
Uh, no. The spoke has the same material throughout its length, therefore, the center is no "stretchier" than either end. It is, however, more flexible, and that flexibility means that the deflection is in the center, as opposed to the ends, which is more likely to break.
I think Pierce and you are saying the same thing slightly differently. If this were an engineering thesis we could debate the subtleties of the language, but for a forum both are close enough.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 02-01-13, 12:12 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 59

Bikes: Catrike Pocket, a few others

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
I think Pierce and you are saying the same thing slightly differently. If this were an engineering thesis we could debate the subtleties of the language, but for a forum both are close enough.
I can't help it: I come from a long line of pedants stretching back to the 17th Century.
400trix is offline  
Old 02-01-13, 01:20 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by 400trix
Uh, no. The spoke has the same material throughout its length, therefore, the center is no "stretchier" than either end..
It depends on how you measure. While elastic modulus is constant, with that being the case extension for a given force is inversely proportional to cross-sectional area. The center of a double-butted spoke stretches more per unit length than its thicker ends.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Old 02-01-13, 01:35 AM
  #23  
S'Cruzer
 
pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 122W 37N
Posts: 2,445

Bikes: too many

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 17 Posts
ahhh, thank you, thats exactly what I meant.
pierce is offline  
Old 02-01-13, 10:06 AM
  #24  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,873

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1795 Post(s)
Liked 1,269 Times in 876 Posts
Maybe the term "elongation" would be more suitable?
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 02-01-13, 05:10 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 56
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If this is your first build, then I would highly recommend Roger Musson's wheelbuilding book which gived a tremendous amount of useful information. I just built my first set and found his book indispensable. His recommendation would be butted spokes.
lvolpe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.