Is This Wheel Built Correctly?
#1
Cyclist
Thread Starter
Is This Wheel Built Correctly?
Recently picked up a pretty old Raleigh road bike ('62-'63), and noticed the spokes never really crossed over (hard to describe, please see pictures). In fact, no two spokes ever touch each other, and they certainly don't go in an under-over pattern. Problem? Not? Safe to ride? Thanks for any help. I can deal with most maintenance issues, but wheels are my weak point.
Oh yeah, I should add that both wheels are built the same way, and seem structurally sound...
Oh yeah, I should add that both wheels are built the same way, and seem structurally sound...
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
It's generally considered less than ideal, but usually not a problem.
As you lose a bit of springiness when the spokes don't brace against each other, rear wheels are sometimes built like that to give snappier acceleration. The straghter path of the spoke increased torsional stiffness a tiny bit. Or out of lazyness, as the build is a tad faster. Can't see any advantage to the pattern on a rim drake front wheel.
The (potential) downside is that the reduced springiness increase the risk of spokes going slack and suffering fatigue.
You can rebuild it interlaced with the same spokes unless the nipples have seized.
As you lose a bit of springiness when the spokes don't brace against each other, rear wheels are sometimes built like that to give snappier acceleration. The straghter path of the spoke increased torsional stiffness a tiny bit. Or out of lazyness, as the build is a tad faster. Can't see any advantage to the pattern on a rim drake front wheel.
The (potential) downside is that the reduced springiness increase the risk of spokes going slack and suffering fatigue.
You can rebuild it interlaced with the same spokes unless the nipples have seized.
Last edited by dabac; 05-08-14 at 12:22 AM.
#3
Cyclist
Thread Starter
Ok, thanks, I'll proceed accordingly. A lot of the spokes were seized and were preventing me from truing, so I replaced them; I just laced them to match the rest of the wheel, but started having second thoughts.
#4
Senior Member
I you're re-lacing, I'd tuck under/over that final crossing as you'll get a slightly stronger/stiffer wheel. But I don't think there is anything wrong with running them the way they are. As the previous poster said, you should be able to use the same spokes if you want to re-lace. A lot of discussion on this forum about re-using spokes, but I take wheels apart for a thorough cleanup and re-lace with new spoke nipples (but old spokes and rim) quite often. Never had any issues whatsoever. I do keep track of spokes carefully in four groups so they return to the same flange (left/right) and same orientation (head-in or head-out).
- Mark
- Mark
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
In a 3X wheel you normally see the subject spoke stay on the same size of the first two spokes it crosses (based on which side of the flange it is on). On the third cross the subject spoke goes behind the crossed spoke. So it should be over, over, under or under, under, over depending upon which spoke you are looking at. It all comes out right in the end either way.
#6
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,117
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 658 Times
in
371 Posts
Looks to me like it has run successfully that way for a long time. I always interlace when I build, although early on I built a few without interlacing, and I was never discerning enough to detect a difference in the ride.
I don't believe durability suffers either.
I don't believe durability suffers either.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
On a front - that doesn't have to carry any torque - I'm having trouble visualizing any advantages or disadvantages.
On a rear - carrying torque - it's easier.
When you interlace, the spokes will brace against each other at an angle. When half of the spokes strive to straighten out due to increased tension from drive torque, they push the other spokes further out from a straight path thereby reducing the loss of tension they would otherwise have seen.
Non-interlaced, all spokes run a straight path from hub to rim. The ones that see strain already are in their ideal position. and the others are a tiny bit freer to flop around.
i see it as one of those things where most people will do fine either way, but then there are the few who are hard on wheels and need every margin they can get for their kit to stay in one piece.
On a rear - carrying torque - it's easier.
When you interlace, the spokes will brace against each other at an angle. When half of the spokes strive to straighten out due to increased tension from drive torque, they push the other spokes further out from a straight path thereby reducing the loss of tension they would otherwise have seen.
Non-interlaced, all spokes run a straight path from hub to rim. The ones that see strain already are in their ideal position. and the others are a tiny bit freer to flop around.
i see it as one of those things where most people will do fine either way, but then there are the few who are hard on wheels and need every margin they can get for their kit to stay in one piece.
#8
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
That's fairly typical for Raleighs of that vintage. Not lacing the spokes saved a little time and money.
#9
Calamari Marionette Ph.D
I you're re-lacing, I'd tuck under/over that final crossing as you'll get a slightly stronger/stiffer wheel. But I don't think there is anything wrong with running them the way they are. As the previous poster said, you should be able to use the same spokes if you want to re-lace. A lot of discussion on this forum about re-using spokes, but I take wheels apart for a thorough cleanup and re-lace with new spoke nipples (but old spokes and rim) quite often. Never had any issues whatsoever. I do keep track of spokes carefully in four groups so they return to the same flange (left/right) and same orientation (head-in or head-out).
- Mark
- Mark
#10
Senior Member
#11
Calamari Marionette Ph.D
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,704
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5778 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,427 Posts
As a rule I weave the last cross on all wheels except for the track, where I'll usually build unwoven.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#13
Collector of Useless Info
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
With large flanges and small wheels, it's nearly impossible to do that weave without really bending the spoke in ways it doesn't wanna... So I sometimes forgo the weave in that case.
One advantage of not weaving is that pinging the spoke rings more true for tensioning. But since I got a tension meter, I don't tension spokes by tone anymore.
One advantage of not weaving is that pinging the spoke rings more true for tensioning. But since I got a tension meter, I don't tension spokes by tone anymore.
#14
Senior Member
Strength and stiffness don't necessarily mean the same thing. Over/under weaving of the last cross increases resilience and can make for a slightly linger lived wheel. However it reduces stiffness. If stiffness is a premium than the straight line path of non-woven construction is the way to go.
- Mark
#15
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,117
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 658 Times
in
371 Posts
With large flanges and small wheels, it's nearly impossible to do that weave without really bending the spoke in ways it doesn't wanna... So I sometimes forgo the weave in that case.
One advantage of not weaving is that pinging the spoke rings more true for tensioning. But since I got a tension meter, I don't tension spokes by tone anymore.
One advantage of not weaving is that pinging the spoke rings more true for tensioning. But since I got a tension meter, I don't tension spokes by tone anymore.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,704
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5778 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,427 Posts
This is why I rarely weave spokes when building on motor hubs.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#17
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,117
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 658 Times
in
371 Posts
Dan, I suspect you might be misreading the intent of the quoted post. He's referring (I think) to the problem of a short run, hub to rim, where weaving introduces too much bend. You see the same problem on 1x builds when the cross is too close to the hub.
This is why I rarely weave spokes when building on motor hubs.
This is why I rarely weave spokes when building on motor hubs.
#18
Newbie
If you haven't already, I'd tear them fully down, fully clean throughout, polish to the nines everywhere, re-lube, set, re-build with high quality spokes and finally calibrate.
#19
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
It has been my experience that an unlaced wheel is weaker as each spoke has to carry the entire weight of bike/rider. Lacing farms out this load to two spokes. I've replaced more broken spokes on unlaced wheels than their laced cousins.
Likes For Panthers007: