GT triple triangle frame thread
#108
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 103
Likes: 19
From: Orange County, CA
Bikes: 1988 Univega Alpina Pro
Thanks for the kind education!
CR
#109
I guess there would be a change in handling characteristics depending on the material type. I was however thinking of aesthetics alone. Carbon fork would just look better! It would also open up the front brake type possibilities.
#110
Death fork? Naaaah!!

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,534
Likes: 959
From: The other Maine, north of RT 2
Bikes: Seriously downsizing.
And the 'ol switch-a-roo is done:

The 56cm frame and fork will be up on the 'For Sale' thread, if anyone is interested.
Top

The 56cm frame and fork will be up on the 'For Sale' thread, if anyone is interested.
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
#111
Full Member
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 231
Likes: 79
From: Oshkosh, WI
Bikes: Trek Farley, Giant Trance X, Salsa Vaya
That ride looks sweet, Top. Love the other stuff in the shed too - 'let's just pile these handlebars right...here.'
I just got a GT Tequesta that I did my first drop bar conversion on - I'd post some pics but you'd all laugh at the adjustable stem I used to figure out what felt decent, lol
I just got a GT Tequesta that I did my first drop bar conversion on - I'd post some pics but you'd all laugh at the adjustable stem I used to figure out what felt decent, lol
#112
The Tempest has finally seen some decent use this year and I am ever more impressed with how stiff, light and agile this bike is.
After a couple of long rides I felt that the large chainring could be larger and that the brakes were not perfectly set up. The crank was a 40/28 and after much reading and deliberation is now successfully a 44/28. It rubs only very slightly on the bottom of the front derailleur whilst in 28/11 which is no problem and the chainring still has about 3mm of play between the teeth and the chainstay. This is accomplished without the use of a drive-side spacer, so the chainline is really optimal!
The resulting gearing is now great for the flats and does not rob my bottom end which I ensure is required! The brake levers went from XT (V-brake, non-adjustable) to Ultegra (Cantilever, adjustable) and I find that they are only OK. Primarily because they are only 2.5 finger where the XT's are 3. The only drawback from the XT's was the longer cable pull, as they are intended for v-brake use. When used with the cantilevers, the pads would kick out very far and the kool-stops would rub on the tires. It was hoped that this would be remedied with the new Ultegra levers, but regretfully was that not the case as the cable pull is still somewhat longer than hoped. What I ended up doing was filing down the upper-rear edges of the kool-stops and now have no rubbing.
The XT levers will most likely get re-installed as they look better and allow more easily, more power application. I am also playing with the idea of installing XT v-brakes to go with the levers. The bike would be slightly heavier but I feel that the braking power and modulation will benefit. I don't feel that they would look as nice as the cantilevers but perhaps after having the arms of the v-brakes polished to a high-shine would they look even better!
Anyhow, the bike was cleaned and I took to it with some metal polish/protectant. It has after all been a couple of years and the aluminum was needing some attention.







After a couple of long rides I felt that the large chainring could be larger and that the brakes were not perfectly set up. The crank was a 40/28 and after much reading and deliberation is now successfully a 44/28. It rubs only very slightly on the bottom of the front derailleur whilst in 28/11 which is no problem and the chainring still has about 3mm of play between the teeth and the chainstay. This is accomplished without the use of a drive-side spacer, so the chainline is really optimal!
The resulting gearing is now great for the flats and does not rob my bottom end which I ensure is required! The brake levers went from XT (V-brake, non-adjustable) to Ultegra (Cantilever, adjustable) and I find that they are only OK. Primarily because they are only 2.5 finger where the XT's are 3. The only drawback from the XT's was the longer cable pull, as they are intended for v-brake use. When used with the cantilevers, the pads would kick out very far and the kool-stops would rub on the tires. It was hoped that this would be remedied with the new Ultegra levers, but regretfully was that not the case as the cable pull is still somewhat longer than hoped. What I ended up doing was filing down the upper-rear edges of the kool-stops and now have no rubbing.
The XT levers will most likely get re-installed as they look better and allow more easily, more power application. I am also playing with the idea of installing XT v-brakes to go with the levers. The bike would be slightly heavier but I feel that the braking power and modulation will benefit. I don't feel that they would look as nice as the cantilevers but perhaps after having the arms of the v-brakes polished to a high-shine would they look even better!
Anyhow, the bike was cleaned and I took to it with some metal polish/protectant. It has after all been a couple of years and the aluminum was needing some attention.







#115
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 272
From: Fort Collins, CO
Bikes: 1974 Paramount ~ 1974 Raleigh Pro ~ 1977 Pro-Tour ~ 1978 TX900 ~ IronMan 85,87:E/M,88:M/Pro,89:E ~ 98 Peugeot Festina Replica
wonder if my 1985 Backwoods is still welcomed although it was pre Triple Triangle for GT, pics are as i got it and its in queue ..deciding on how to build it.

1985 Timberline , as i got it. not much is original

Proof its a GT

Yes stock with a GT Epoch headset.. basically it has a spring in the headset that keeps the top race from loosening . it was a mainstay on the GT Freestyle bikes

1985 Timberline , as i got it. not much is original

Proof its a GT

Yes stock with a GT Epoch headset.. basically it has a spring in the headset that keeps the top race from loosening . it was a mainstay on the GT Freestyle bikes
#116
^^ Heck yes! Roll it out and get it built! Those top tube end caps are just like the hangers they used to sell mech in the stores. I’m one to talk, my 91 Karakoram Elite is taking forever as well.
#117
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 272
From: Fort Collins, CO
Bikes: 1974 Paramount ~ 1974 Raleigh Pro ~ 1977 Pro-Tour ~ 1978 TX900 ~ IronMan 85,87:E/M,88:M/Pro,89:E ~ 98 Peugeot Festina Replica
I see it as a urban cruiser as sorts since it was not a great ATB as new. and its got the long lines on it..
#118
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 4,177
Likes: 1,292
From: San Mateo,Ca.
Bikes: TRIMMED DOWN THE HERD
wonder if my 1985 Backwoods is still welcomed although it was pre Triple Triangle for GT, pics are as i got it and its in queue ..deciding on how to build it.

1985 Timberline , as i got it. not much is original

Proof its a GT

Yes stock with a GT Epoch headset.. basically it has a spring in the headset that keeps the top race from loosening . it was a mainstay on the GT Freestyle bikes

1985 Timberline , as i got it. not much is original

Proof its a GT

Yes stock with a GT Epoch headset.. basically it has a spring in the headset that keeps the top race from loosening . it was a mainstay on the GT Freestyle bikes
My Muddy Fox Explorer has a similar headset. Pretty cool engineering, IMO.
#119
I don't know if you will find this outside of Europe. Sonax Chrome and Aluminum polish.
#120
wonder if my 1985 Backwoods is still welcomed although it was pre Triple Triangle for GT, pics are as i got it and its in queue ..deciding on how to build it.
Yes stock with a GT Epoch headset.. basically it has a spring in the headset that keeps the top race from loosening . it was a mainstay on the GT Freestyle bikes
Yes stock with a GT Epoch headset.. basically it has a spring in the headset that keeps the top race from loosening . it was a mainstay on the GT Freestyle bikes
#121
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 272
From: Fort Collins, CO
Bikes: 1974 Paramount ~ 1974 Raleigh Pro ~ 1977 Pro-Tour ~ 1978 TX900 ~ IronMan 85,87:E/M,88:M/Pro,89:E ~ 98 Peugeot Festina Replica
[MENTION=448521]2cam16[/MENTION], I totally forgot about these headsets, i remember hearing about them back in the 80's, but never tore one apart.. til this one!
[MENTION=396177]pressed001[/MENTION]. Thank you, your tempest is beautiful! I will start a thread for it when i start building it, just have to figure out how i want to build it..
[MENTION=396177]pressed001[/MENTION]. Thank you, your tempest is beautiful! I will start a thread for it when i start building it, just have to figure out how i want to build it..
#122
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
1999 Korakoram hardtail
I am the original owner of this. I believe it's a 1999 based on bikepedia (although their photo is terrible and does not show the true color). I rarely use the bike and when I do it's mostly on the flats. Unfortunately never got into taking this off road. It's a time capsule of original parts as I don't remember replacing anything (the gt pedals are somewhere).
Just sharing...




Just sharing...




#123
I am the original owner of this. I believe it's a 1999 based on bikepedia (although their photo is terrible and does not show the true color). I rarely use the bike and when I do it's mostly on the flats. Unfortunately never got into taking this off road. It's a time capsule of original parts as I don't remember replacing anything (the gt pedals are somewhere).











