Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Overgeared - chain ring advice?

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Overgeared - chain ring advice?

Reply

Old 12-07-17, 12:48 PM
  #1  
Phamilton
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Phamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Overgeared - chain ring advice?

My Raleigh frankenbike (attached photo from last week) is geared 52/42 and 14-28 7 sp FW. We have had some extremely windy days the last week that have made me start thinking about my gearing. I ride this bike 26 miles RT daily as my commuter (we are car-free).

The gearing is a little tall for me. I'm still relatively new to cycling, and there is way too much drivetrain info out there for me to make any sense of it. When I first started commuting 3 months ago I thought there may be a chance that over time my increased fitness level would overcome the gearing, but I also have an injury on my left leg that limits how much I can push/grind.

It's a factory Sakae crankset, 110mm BCD. Has anyone done a similar chain ring swap to lower their gears? I thought about a megarange freewheel and that would get me the granny 34T low gear but what I'd really like is to lower the entire gear range a little. As it stands I can only use the big chain ring on flats without a headwind or downhill.

It seems like 50/34 is a pretty standard road setup and after crunching the numbers into Sheldon's gear calc, looks like it would offer me the additional low end that I'd be looking for, but searching for chain rings it looks like most of them say for 10-11 speed, and I have no idea what the implications would be using those on my 5-6-7 speed drivetrain.

I'm planning to replace the bike next year w/ something with a triple in the front. I may even convert a MTB or hybrid to drop bars. For now, though, I'm in way over my head. What practical options may be available to me? It's a cheap junk bike, but it's all I have and can't justify spending more on a crankset/chain rings than the bike is worth.


-Joseph
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_1321.JPG (183.8 KB, 354 views)
Phamilton is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 12:56 PM
  #2  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 1,960

Bikes: Bob Jackson World Tour, 81 miyata 912 and 86 miyata 312.

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 621 Post(s)
first off, its an excellent bike. a couple of ways to go here. i would recommend a 34 and 46 for your chainrings if it were me. i would consider a megarange freewheel as well. they go from 14-34 and are available in 6 and 7 speed.

the number of speeds the chainrings are made to handle is not important. they will work with your bike for sure. keep up the good work man! personally i like that bike a lot.
52telecaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 01:20 PM
  #3  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,147

Bikes: Mine's 69 PX-10, 82 Medici, 2011 Sachs, , 87 Schwinn Circuit, 69'PX-10, 87 MV Ironman, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 351 Post(s)
https://www.modernbike.com/sugino-chainrings

I suggest 48/34. It looks like your rear derailleur can handle a mega range but tighter spacing between gears is better in my opinion.
Classtime is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 01:22 PM
  #4  
Rotten 
Senior Member
 
Rotten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Texas panhandle
Posts: 379
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Nice bike!


Just my .02 here but you can easily convert your bike to a 3x and it would be much cheaper than a new or new to you bike.
If you like the way the Raleigh rides just pick up a triple crankset. A quick check of fleabay shows several Sakae triples and there's even one in my preferred 48/38/28. Putting a triple on will require a new bottom bracket and you might need to swap the RD for a longer cage version and the FD for a triple if your current one won't swing far enough. That said if you take care not to cross chain you might not need a different RD.


Doing a drivetrain upgrade with good used parts will be the cheapest option IMO.
Rotten is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 01:31 PM
  #5  
Phamilton
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Phamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Classtime View Post
https://www.modernbike.com/sugino-chainrings

I suggest 48/34. It looks like your rear derailleur can handle a mega range but tighter spacing between gears is better in my opinion.
Thanks! I'd never heard of that retailer before, always nice to find additional options.

So ... the 48T "outer" ring is self-explanatory. The 34T that I've found (including on the site you linked) are designated as "middle" - would this likely work on the inner position? I am ignorant of spacing conventions and chainlines.

Tighter spacing between the gears is becoming increasingly important to me as the large jumps between gears can sometimes be painful. Some of that will be addressed by my riding/shifting technique improving continually (and slowly LOL) over time.
Phamilton is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 01:33 PM
  #6  
Nooner
If you brake you dont win
 
Nooner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Inland Empire
Posts: 98

Bikes: Santa Cruz Bronson, Trek Remedy 9.8, Cervelo S3, Kona Big Honzo, Cannondale R500, DiamondBack Apex, one storage unit my wife knows nothing about, and one ball crushing unicycle for kicks

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
A very nice bike OP.
I think a 48/34 combo would be beneficial.
Nooner is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 01:37 PM
  #7  
ksryder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,535

Bikes: yes

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 570 Post(s)
50/34 or 48/34 would work fine and the front doesn't care how many gears are in back, so it would work fine with your 7 speed.
ksryder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 01:38 PM
  #8  
twodownzero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 853

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Ribble Nero Corsa

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
A 48/32 subcompact was practically made for this.

I'm using an 8 speed triple crankset with a 10 speed drivetrain with no issues. The concern is generally about front shifting and total takeup on your rear derailleur. It looks like your bike has stem shifters, which I assume are friction shift. If so, can use basically any rear derailleur you want if it'll bolt up to your hanger, if somehow your current one is insufficient for whatever range you need. A longer cage rear derailleur is probably a good idea.

Whatever you do and whatever you change to, make certain that your chain is the correct length for the large large and small small combinations. Especially if your chain is too short, it could do a great deal of damage to your drivetrain and/or frame if it doesn't fit! A new chain is <$20, so don't take the risk.
twodownzero is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 01:41 PM
  #9  
noobinsf 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 879

Bikes: '04 Felt SR91, '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '72 Puch Bergmeister

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Classtime View Post
https://www.modernbike.com/sugino-chainrings

I suggest 48/34. It looks like your rear derailleur can handle a mega range but tighter spacing between gears is better in my opinion.
I second this. That's a good price for chainrings, and to keep your budget tight, you would just need a crank puller (buy or borrow) to replace them yourself. You would just need to shorten your chain (lots of online sources about chain sizing), so a chain breaker tool as well. Those should be your only expenses if you go that route, providing your chain and freewheel are in good shape and don't warrant replacement.
noobinsf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 01:50 PM
  #10  
sreuter13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 65

Bikes: 1990 Fuji Absolute, 2001 GT Aggressor

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Nice bike!!

I completed the same type of conversion this summer on my 1990 Fuji Absolute.

Currently, I am running a Shimano MEGA_RANGE 14-34 7speed cassette with a 34-50 up front for chain rings. That range is perfect for all hills and winds for the most part.
sreuter13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 01:57 PM
  #11  
Aubergine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 2,238

Bikes: Too many to list

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Another option is to move your current 42 tooth ring to the outside, and just buy a 34 for the inside. You won’t have as wide a range, but unless you frequently spin out your 52 tooth chainring, you won’t need it.
Aubergine is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 02:11 PM
  #12  
Phamilton
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Phamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Aubergine View Post
Another option is to move your current 42 tooth ring to the outside, and just buy a 34 for the inside. You won’t have as wide a range, but unless you frequently spin out your 52 tooth chainring, you won’t need it.
LOL

I've NEVER spun out the 52. I can't - no descents long or steep enough around here, and my bum leg is the other significant factor.

Maybe I could do 42/38 and do half-step gearing. ;-) That might be original! 'Cept I might be banished to Alt Bike Culture for such an unconventional mod.

In Indiana, we only have climbs. They failed to install descents on the back sides of our hills. You get used to it after a while though.

Seriously, though, good suggestion. I'll play with the numbers and see what it looks like.
Phamilton is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 02:19 PM
  #13  
verktyg 
verktyg
 
verktyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,548

Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1990 Bianchi Mondiale, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA Team Pro, 1973 Holdsworth

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Rather than reinvent the wheel....

If I remember correctly, having only been there once or twice, Ft. Wayne is fairly flat country.

A low gear of 42T-28T should be more than adequate for that area. During the 1970's US Bike Boom, 52-42T chainrings x 14-28T freewheels were the norm for "10 Speed Racing Bikes".

That was referred to as Alpine Gearing.

Maybe I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish???

There were several reasons for the development of multi-speed gearing on bicycles. That technology developed around the turn of the 1800's to the 1900's.

The first reason was to provide lower gear ratios for climbing hills. Later on, higher gear ratios allowed for faster speeds at the same pedaling cadence (pedaling RPM).

The introduction of 4, 5, 6 speed gearing and so on allows a rider to maintain a constant cadence over changes in conditions such as hills or winds.

Building up strength by working on increasing you pedaling cadence helps to improve your breathing and cardio vascular system.

Racers used to ride at cadences well over 100 rpm. For a noncompetitive rider, a cadence of 50-60 rpm is a good target

Hopes this helps.

Chas.
__________________
Things aren't always what they seem... Don't believe everything you think!

Chas. ;-)
verktyg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 02:21 PM
  #14  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 1,960

Bikes: Bob Jackson World Tour, 81 miyata 912 and 86 miyata 312.

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 621 Post(s)
34-42 is a real inexpensive solution and middle rings will work inside, just as middle rings will work outside. so for the price of the 34 you could be set. you'll want to lower the front derailleur a bit and you may need to shorten the chain.

as for halfstep... i run 24-39-42 and love it.

one last note, you could buy a triplizer 34 tooth ring that would later convert your crank to a triple. then with 24-34-42 you'd be good for about anything.
52telecaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 02:21 PM
  #15  
Aubergine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 2,238

Bikes: Too many to list

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Phamilton View Post
LOL

I've NEVER spun out the 52. I can't - no descents long or steep enough around here, and my bum leg is the other significant factor.

Maybe I could do 42/38 and do half-step gearing. ;-) That might be original! 'Cept I might be banished to Alt Bike Culture for such an unconventional mod.
I actually have several bikes with a 26-38-42 setup. It works quite well in hilly Seattle. I also still have an older Rodriguez with a 42-46 half-step on a Nuovo Record crank. Nothing at all wrong with half-step gearing when it makes sense.
Aubergine is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 02:27 PM
  #16  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 1,960

Bikes: Bob Jackson World Tour, 81 miyata 912 and 86 miyata 312.

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 621 Post(s)
this is the ring you could use to make your crank a triple. https://www.modernbike.com/interloc-...d-34t---silver
52telecaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 02:39 PM
  #17  
Phamilton
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Phamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Originally Posted by verktyg View Post
Rather than reinvent the wheel....

If I remember correctly, having only been there once or twice, Ft. Wayne is fairly flat country.

A low gear of 42T-28T should be more than adequate for that area. During the 1970's US Bike Boom, 52-42T chainrings x 14-28T freewheels were the norm for "10 Speed Racing Bikes".

That was referred to as Alpine Gearing.

Maybe I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish???

There were several reasons for the development of multi-speed gearing on bicycles. That technology developed around the turn of the 1800's to the 1900's.

The first reason was to provide lower gear ratios for climbing hills. Later on, higher gear ratios allowed for faster speeds at the same pedaling cadence (pedaling RPM).

The introduction of 4, 5, 6 speed gearing and so on allows a rider to maintain a constant cadence over changes in conditions such as hills or winds.

Building up strength by working on increasing you pedaling cadence helps to improve your breathing and cardio vascular system.

Racers used to ride at cadences well over 100 rpm. For a noncompetitive rider, a cadence of 50-60 rpm is a good target

Hopes this helps.

Chas.
Sorry if I was not clear about what I'm trying to accomplish.

You are correct that Fort Wayne area is pretty flat. My daily commute has about a 300 ft total gain, at 13 miles in length. There are a few hills that are pretty challenging without a headwind, and dropping it down into 42/28 I still can't spin faster than 60 rpm. Below about 60, I start to have serious issues with my left knee. Cancer took the adductor muscles from my left leg about 5 years ago, and while this muscle group isn't primarily used for power, it places significant limitations on my strength/flexibility/control.

After doing this ride every weekday for 3 months and 1800+ miles, I have realized that 52/42 and 14-28 is too steep for ME, not necessarily too steep for anybody else, or for recreational riders, or the target demographic of manufacturers during the bike boom.

Also, while this area is pretty flat it can get pretty windy, especially in the winter months. My commute is 90% through the farmland to the north and east of the city. In the winter, when the crops are harvested and the leaves off the trees, the winds are quite a bit stronger than in the city. Further, the prevailing winds here are from the southwest, and I work directly northeast from home, so nearly every ride home is a headwind.

The first 6 weeks or so saw some pretty impressive improvements in my stamina/strength/flexibility/cardio/overall fitness, but this has since entered a "plateau" and the improvements are much smaller now, and this is to be expected I think.

Installing another freewheel with a 34T granny gets me ONE more usable gear. Installing smaller chain rings in the front lowers the gear range of the entire drivetrain and may afford me SEVERAL more usable gears.

Does this make sense?

It may have made more sense for me to have posted this in Commuting, but as my bike is vintage I thought perhaps someone may have had direct experience with this sort of problem. Sorry if I am barking up the wrong tree.
Phamilton is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 02:48 PM
  #18  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,147

Bikes: Mine's 69 PX-10, 82 Medici, 2011 Sachs, , 87 Schwinn Circuit, 69'PX-10, 87 MV Ironman, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 351 Post(s)
This was the right place. Commuters would have recommended an Ebike for the headwinds.
Classtime is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 02:57 PM
  #19  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,207

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 91 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1413 Post(s)
Good plan IMHO. Since the bike has a 110 BCD crankset, there's a lot of capacity for changing the gearing through chainring swaps. It's pretty easy to do, and it will give you what you want. You don't even need to take the cranks off to do it. You will need to lower the front derailleur and readjust it afterwards, that is all.

RE "middle" chainrings: A typical Sugino triple crankset doesn't use a middle chainring. The middle is the same as a 110 inner, and the smallest chainring has it's own smaller 74mm bolt circle. However, there is such a thing as a triple crank with all 3 chainrings on the same 110 BCD bolt circle. A true middle chainring is required for cranks like this. They are different because they have no countersunk recesses for the chainring bolts.

The picture of that particular 34t 'middle' looks like it is this type. If so, it won't work. Chainring bolts need those recesses to stay tight. I'm not sure why this is, but it is. You might contact them to ask.

Long story short, you want a 110 34t 'inner'. Pretty common item. Someone has it.

EDIT - Since 34 is the smallest size in this position, seems unlikely this is a middle (uncountersunk) ring. Probably will work fine, but ask to be sure.

Last edited by Salamandrine; 12-07-17 at 05:37 PM. Reason: typos as susual + correction
Salamandrine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 03:01 PM
  #20  
Phamilton
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Phamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Classtime View Post
This was the right place. Commuters would have recommended an Ebike for the headwinds.
It's true!!!!!
LOL
Phamilton is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 03:06 PM
  #21  
palincss
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 306
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Phamilton View Post
My Raleigh frankenbike (attached photo from last week) is geared 52/42 and 14-28 7 sp FW. We have had some extremely windy days the last week that have made me start thinking about my gearing. I ride this bike 26 miles RT daily as my commuter (we are car-free).

The gearing is a little tall for me. I'm still relatively new to cycling, and there is way too much drivetrain info out there for me to make any sense of it. When I first started commuting 3 months ago I thought there may be a chance that over time my increased fitness level would overcome the gearing, but I also have an injury on my left leg that limits how much I can push/grind.

It's a factory Sakae crankset, 110mm BCD. Has anyone done a similar chain ring swap to lower their gears? I thought about a megarange freewheel and that would get me the granny 34T low gear but what I'd really like is to lower the entire gear range a little. As it stands I can only use the big chain ring on flats without a headwind or downhill.

It seems like 50/34 is a pretty standard road setup and after crunching the numbers into Sheldon's gear calc, looks like it would offer me the additional low end that I'd be looking for, but searching for chain rings it looks like most of them say for 10-11 speed, and I have no idea what the implications would be using those on my 5-6-7 speed drivetrain.
50/34 would be an improvement. Sugino standard chain rings (not ramped or pinned) such as these Sugino Standard Chainring | Jenson USA
would be just fine.

Of course, the question is how low do you need to go, and how much of a high gear do you need. If your current setup comes fairly close but you could do with two more downshifts, 50x34 and your current cassette would do the trick.
palincss is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 03:11 PM
  #22  
palincss
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 306
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Originally Posted by twodownzero View Post
A 48/32 subcompact was practically made for this.

I'm using an 8 speed triple crankset with a 10 speed drivetrain with no issues. The concern is generally about front shifting and total takeup on your rear derailleur. It looks like your bike has stem shifters, which I assume are friction shift. If so, can use basically any rear derailleur you want if it'll bolt up to your hanger, if somehow your current one is insufficient for whatever range you need. A longer cage rear derailleur is probably a good idea.
If the current setup works OK with a 52/42 and a 14-28 7spd freewheel it should work equally well with a 50/34. This is well within the typical range of short cage rear derailleurs. If you went with a megarange freewheel, on the other hand, that's a different story. If a low gear in the low 30s is sufficient, changing two chain rings is probably the simplest way to get there.
palincss is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 03:18 PM
  #23  
palincss
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 306
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Phamilton View Post
LOL
Maybe I could do 42/38 and do half-step gearing. ;-) That might be original! 'Cept I might be banished to Alt Bike Culture for such an unconventional mod.
Would 38x28 give you a low enough gear? It's not that much lower than what you have now. Also, you aren't going to be half-steeping with that freewheel, you'll have a bunch of duplicate gears rather than ones half a step apart. And you'd need a new crank: you're not getting a 28T onto a 110 double crank.

Your original idea, on the other hand, does make a lot of sense (provided 33" is low enough). Two chain rings and a new chain, and you're good to go.
palincss is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 03:23 PM
  #24  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 1,960

Bikes: Bob Jackson World Tour, 81 miyata 912 and 86 miyata 312.

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 621 Post(s)
by the way, i am on the commuter forum a lot and i would not have suggested an ebike.....
52telecaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-17, 03:30 PM
  #25  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,147

Bikes: Mine's 69 PX-10, 82 Medici, 2011 Sachs, , 87 Schwinn Circuit, 69'PX-10, 87 MV Ironman, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 351 Post(s)
Originally Posted by 52telecaster View Post
by the way, i am on the commuter forum a lot and i would not have suggested an ebike.....
Someone There would have.
Classtime is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service